9.7 Double-convex lenses are to be manufactured from a glass of refractive index 1.55, with both faces of the same radius of curvature. What is the radius of curvature required if the focal length is to be 20cm?

9.31 Figure 9.30 shows an equiconvex lens (of refractive index 1.50) in contact with a liquid layer on top of a plane mirror. A small needle with its tip on the principal axis is moved along the axis until its inverted image is found at the position of the needle. The distance of the needle from the lens is measured to be 45.0cm. The liquid is removed and the experiment is repeated. The new distance is measured to be 30.0cm. What is the refractive index of the liquid? FIGURE 9.30 253 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Notes Reprint 2025-26 Wave Optics Chapter Ten WAVE OPTICS 10.1 INTRODUCTION In 1637 Descartes gave the corpuscular model of light and derived Snell’s law. It explained the laws of reflection and refraction of light at an interface. The corpuscular model predicted that if the ray of light (on refraction) bends towards the normal then the speed of light would be greater in the second medium. This corpuscular model of light was further developed by Isaac Newton in his famous book entitled OPTICKS and because of the tremendous popularity of this book, the corpuscular model is very often attributed to Newton. In 1678, the Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens put forward the wave theory of light – it is this wave model of light that we will discuss in this chapter. As we will see, the wave model could satisfactorily explain the phenomena of reflection and refraction; however, it predicted that on refraction if the wave bends towards the normal then the speed of light would be less in the second medium. This is in contradiction to the prediction made by using the corpuscular model of light. It was much later confirmed by experiments where it was shown that the speed of light in water is less than the speed in air confirming the prediction of the wave model; Foucault carried out this experiment in 1850. The wave theory was not readily accepted primarily because of Newton’s authority and also because light could travel through vacuum255 Reprint 2025-26 Physics and it was felt that a wave would always require a medium to propagate from one point to the other. However, when Thomas Young performed his famous interference experiment in 1801, it was firmly established that light is indeed a wave phenomenon. The wavelength of visible light was measured and found to be extremely small; for example, the wavelength of yellow light is about 0.6 mm. Because of the smallness of the wavelength of visible light (in comparison to the dimensions of typical mirrors and lenses), light can be assumed to approximately travel in straight lines. This is the field of geometrical optics, which we had discussed in the previous chapter. Indeed, the branch of optics in which one completely neglects the finiteness of the wavelength is called geometrical optics and a ray is defined as the path of energy propagation in the limit of wavelength tending to zero. After the interference experiment of Young in 1801, for the next 40 years or so, many experiments were carried out involving the interference and diffraction of lightwaves; these experiments could only be satisfactorily explained by assuming a wave model of light. Thus, around the middle of the nineteenth century, the wave theory seemed to be very well established. The only major difficulty was that since it was thought that a wave required a medium for its propagation, how could light waves propagate through vacuum. This was explained when Maxwell put forward his famous electromagnetic theory of light. Maxwell had developed a set of equations describing the laws of electricity and magnetism and using these equations he derived what is known as the wave equation from which he predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves*. From the wave equation, Maxwell could calculate the speed of electromagnetic waves in free space and he found that the theoretical value was very close to the measured value of speed of light. From this, he propounded that light must be an electromagnetic wave. Thus, according to Maxwell, light waves are associated with changing electric and magnetic fields; changing electric field produces a time and space varying magnetic field and a changing magnetic field produces a time and space varying electric field. The changing electric and magnetic fields result in the propagation of electromagnetic waves (or light waves) even in vacuum. In this chapter we will first discuss the original formulation of the Huygens principle and derive the laws of reflection and refraction. In Sections 10.4 and 10.5, we will discuss the phenomenon of interference which is based on the principle of superposition. In Section 10.6 we will discuss the phenomenon of diffraction which is based on Huygens- Fresnel principle. Finally in Section 10.7 we will discuss the phenomenon of polarisation which is based on the fact that the light waves are transverse electromagnetic waves. * Maxwell had predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves around 1855; it was much later (around 1890) that Heinrich Hertz produced radiowaves in the laboratory. J.C. Bose and G. Marconi made practical applications of the Hertzian 256 waves Reprint 2025-26 Wave Optics

9.20 (a) (i) Let a parallel beam be the incident from the left on the convex lens first. f1 = 30 cm and u1 = – , give v1 = + 30 cm. This image becomes a virtual object for the second lens. f2 = –20 cm, u 2 = + (30 – 8) cm = + 22 cm which gives, v2 = – 220 cm. The parallel incident beam appears to diverge from a point 216 cm from the centre of the two-lens system. (ii) Let the parallel beam be incident from the left on the concave lens first: f1 = – 20 cm, u1 = – ¥, give v1 = – 20 cm. This image becomes a real object for the second lens: f2 = + 30 cm, u2 = – (20 + 8) cm = – 28 cm which gives, v2 = – 420 cm. The parallel incident beam appears to diverge from a point 416 cm on the left of the centre of the two-lens system. Clearly, the answer depends on which side of the lens system the parallel beam is incident. Further we do not have a simple lens equation true for all u (and v) in terms of a definite constant of the system (the constant being determined by f1 and f2, and the separation between the lenses). The notion of effective focal length, therefore, does not seem to be meaningful for this system. (b) u1 = – 40 cm, f1 = 30 cm, gives v1= 120 cm. Magnitude of magnification due to the first (convex) lens is 3. u 2 = + (120 – 8) cm = +112 cm (object virtual); 112 × 20 f2 = – 20 cm which gives v2 = − cm 92 Magnitude of magnification due to the second (concave) 347 Reprint 2025-26 Physics lens = 20/92. Net magnitude of magnification = 0.652 Size of the image = 0.98 cm 9.21 If the refracted ray in the prism is incident on the second face at the critical angle ic, the angle of refraction r at the first face is (60°–ic). Now, ic = sin–1 (1/1.524) ~ 41° Therefore, r = 19° sin i = 0.4962; i ~ 30° 1 1 1 9.22 (a) + = v 9 10 i.e., v = – 90 cm, Magnitude of magnification = 90/9 = 10. Each square in the virtual image has an area 10 × 10 × 1 mm2 = 100 mm2 = 1 cm2 (b) Magnifying power = 25/9 = 2.8 (c) No, magnification of an image by a lens and angular magnification (or magnifying power) of an optical instrument are two separate things. The latter is the ratio of the angular size of the object (which is equal to the angular size of the image even if the image is magnified) to the angular size of the object if placed at the near point (25 cm). Thus, magnification magnitude is |(v/u)| and magnifying power is (25/ |u|). Only when the image is located at the near point |v| = 25 cm, are the two quantities equal. 9.23 (a) Maximum magnifying power is obtained when the image is at the near point (25 cm) u = – 7.14 cm. (b) Magnitude of magnification = (25/ |u|) = 3.5. (c) Magnifying power = 3.5 Yes, the magnifying power (when the image is produced at 25 cm) is equal to the magnitude of magnification. 9.24 Magnification = ( 6.25 / 1) = 2.5 v = +2.5u 1 1 1    2.5u u 10 i.e.,u = – 6 cm |v| = 15 cm The virtual image is closer than the normal near point (25 cm) and cannot be seen by the eye distinctly. 9.25 (a) Even though the absolute image size is bigger than the object size, the angular size of the image is equal to the angular size of the object. The magnifier helps in the following way: without it object would be placed no closer than 25 cm; with it the object can be placed much closer. The closer object has larger angular size than the same object at 25 cm. It is in this sense that angular magnification is achieved. (b) Yes, it decreases a little because the angle subtended at the eye is then slightly less than the angle subtended at the lens. The Reprint 2025-26 Answers effect is negligible if the image is at a very large distance away. [Note: When the eye is separated from the lens, the angles subtended at the eye by the first object and its image are not equal.] (c) First, grinding lens of very small focal length is not easy. More important, if you decrease focal length, aberrations (both spherical and chromatic) become more pronounced. So, in practice, you cannot get a magnifying power of more than 3 or so with a simple convex lens. However, using an aberration corrected lens system, one can increase this limit by a factor of 10 or so. (d) Angular magnification of eye-piece is [(25/fe) + 1] ( fe in cm) which increases if fe is smaller. Further, magnification of the objective v O 1 = is given by | u O | (| u O |/ f O ) − 1 which is large when |u O | is slightly greater than fO. The micro- scope is used for viewing very close object. So |u O | is small, and so is fO. (e) The image of the objective in the eye-piece is known as ‘eye-ring’. All the rays from the object refracted by objective go through the eye-ring. Therefore, it is an ideal position for our eyes for viewing. If we place our eyes too close to the eye-piece, we shall not collect much of the light and also reduce our field of view. If we position our eyes on the eye-ring and the area of the pupil of our eye is greater or equal to the area of the eye-ring, our eyes will collect all the light refracted by the objective. The precise location of the eye-ring naturally depends on the separation between the objective and the eye-piece. When you view through a microscope by placing your eyes on one end,the ideal distance between the eyes and eye-piece is usually built-in the design of the instrument.