12.6 DE BROGLIE’S EXPLANATION OF BOHR’S SECOND POSTULATE OF QUANTISATION Of all the postulates, Bohr made in his model of the atom, perhaps the most puzzling is his second postulate. It states that the angular momentum of the electron orbiting around the nucleus is quantised (that is, Ln = nh/2p; n = 1, 2, 3 …). Why should the angular momentum have only those values that are integral multiples of h/2p? The French physicist Louis de Broglie explained this puzzle in 1923, ten years after Bohr proposed his model. We studied, in Chapter 11, about the de Broglie’s hypothesis that material particles, such as electrons, also have a wave nature. C. J. Davisson and L. H. Germer later experimentally verified the wave nature of electrons in 1927. Louis de Broglie argued that the electron in its circular orbit, as proposed by Bohr, must be seen as a particle wave. In analogy to waves travelling on a string, particle waves too can lead to standing waves under resonant conditions. From FIGURE 12.8 A standing wave Chapter 14 of Class XI Physics textbook, we know that when is shown on a circular orbit a string is plucked, a vast number of wavelengths are excited. where four de Broglie wavelengths fit into theHowever only those wavelengths survive which have nodes circumference of the orbit. at the ends and form the standing wave in the string. It means that in a string, standing waves are formed when the total distance travelled by a wave down the string and back is one wavelength, two wavelengths, or any integral number of wavelengths. Waves with other wavelengths interfere with themselves upon reflection and their amplitudes quickly drop to zero. For an electron moving in nth circular orbit of radius rn, the total distance is the circumference of the orbit, 3012prn. Thus Reprint 2025-26 Physics 2p rn = nl, n = 1, 2, 3... (12.12) Figure 12.8 illustrates a standing particle wave on a circular orbit for n = 4, i.e., 2prn = 4l, where l is the de Broglie wavelength of the electron moving in nth orbit. From Chapter 11, we have l = h/p, where p is the magnitude of the electron’s momentum. If the speed of the electron is much less than the speed of light, the momentum is mvn. Thus, l = h/ mvn. From Eq. (12.12), we have 2p rn = n h/mvn or m vn rn = nh/2p This is the quantum condition proposed by Bohr for the angular momentum of the electron [Eq. (12.15)]. In Section 12.5, we saw that this equation is the basis of explaining the discrete orbits and energy levels in hydrogen atom. Thus de Broglie hypothesis provided an explanation for Bohr’s second postulate for the quantisation of angular momentum of the orbiting electron. The quantised electron orbits and energy states are due to the wave nature of the electron and only resonant standing waves can persist. Bohr’s model, involving classical trajectory picture (planet-like electron orbiting the nucleus), correctly predicts the gross features of the hydrogenic atoms*, in particular, the frequencies of the radiation emitted or selectively absorbed. This model however has many limitations. Some are: (i) The Bohr model is applicable to hydrogenic atoms. It cannot be extended even to mere two electron atoms such as helium. The analysis of atoms with more than one electron was attempted on the lines of Bohr’s model for hydrogenic atoms but did not meet with any success. Difficulty lies in the fact that each electron interacts not only with the positively charged nucleus but also with all other electrons. The formulation of Bohr model involves electrical force between positively charged nucleus and electron. It does not include the electrical forces between electrons which necessarily appear in multi-electron atoms. (ii) While the Bohr’s model correctly predicts the frequencies of the light emitted by hydrogenic atoms, the model is unable to explain the relative intensities of the frequencies in the spectrum. In emission spectrum of hydrogen, some of the visible frequencies have weak intensity, others strong. Why? Experimental observations depict that some transitions are more favoured than others. Bohr’s model is unable to account for the intensity variations. Bohr’s model presents an elegant picture of an atom and cannot be generalised to complex atoms. For complex atoms we have to use a new and radical theory based on Quantum Mechanics, which provides a more complete picture of the atomic structure. * Hydrogenic atoms are the atoms consisting of a nucleus with positive charge +Ze and a single electron, where Z is the proton number. Examples are hydrogen atom, singly ionised helium, doubly ionised lithium, and so forth. In these 302 atoms more complex electron-electron interactions are nonexistent. Reprint 2025-26 Atoms SUMMARY 1. Atom, as a whole, is electrically neutral and therefore contains equal amount of positive and negative charges. 2. In Thomson’s model, an atom is a spherical cloud of positive charges with electrons embedded in it. 3. In Rutherford’s model, most of the mass of the atom and all its positive charge are concentrated in a tiny nucleus (typically one by ten thousand the size of an atom), and the electrons revolve around it. 4. Rutherford nuclear model has two main difficulties in explaining the structure of atom: (a) It predicts that atoms are unstable because the accelerated electrons revolving around the nucleus must spiral into the nucleus. This contradicts the stability of matter. (b) It cannot explain the characteristic line spectra of atoms of different elements. 5. Atoms of most of the elements are stable and emit characteristic spectrum. The spectrum consists of a set of isolated parallel lines termed as line spectrum. It provides useful information about the atomic structure. 6. To explain the line spectra emitted by atoms, as well as the stability of atoms, Niel’s Bohr proposed a model for hydrogenic (single elctron) atoms. He introduced three postulates and laid the foundations of quantum mechanics: (a) In a hydrogen atom, an electron revolves in certain stable orbits (called stationary orbits) without the emission of radiant energy. (b) The stationary orbits are those for which the angular momentum is some integral multiple of h/2p. (Bohr’s quantisation condition.) That is L = nh/2p, where n is an integer called the principal quantum number. (c) The third postulate states that an electron might make a transition from one of its specified non-radiating orbits to another of lower energy. When it does so, a photon is emitted having energy equal to the energy difference between the initial and final states. The frequency (n) of the emitted photon is then given by hn = Ei – Ef An atom absorbs radiation of the same frequency the atom emits, in which case the electron is transferred to an orbit with a higher value of n. Ei + hn = Ef 7. As a result of the quantisation condition of angular momentum, the electron orbits the nucleus at only specific radii. For a hydrogen atom it is given by  n 2   h  2 4 πε0 rn = 2  m   2 π  e The total energy is also quantised: me 4 E n = − 2 2 2 8n ε0 h = –13.6 eV/n2 The n = 1 state is called ground state. In hydrogen atom the ground state energy is –13.6 eV. Higher values of n correspond to excited states (n > 1). Atoms are excited to these higher states by collisions with other atoms or electrons or by absorption of a photon of right frequency. 303 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 8. de Broglie’s hypothesis that electrons have a wavelength λ = h/mv gave an explanation for Bohr’s quantised orbits by bringing in the wave- particle duality. The orbits correspond to circular standing waves in which the circumference of the orbit equals a whole number of wavelengths. 9. Bohr’s model is applicable only to hydrogenic (single electron) atoms. It cannot be extended to even two electron atoms such as helium. This model is also unable to explain for the relative intensities of the frequencies emitted even by hydrogenic atoms. POINTSPOINTSPOINTSPOINTSPOINTS TOTOTOTOTO PONDERPONDERPONDERPONDERPONDER 1. Both the Thomson’s as well as the Rutherford’s models constitute an unstable system. Thomson’s model is unstable electrostatically, while Rutherford’s model is unstable because of electromagnetic radiation of orbiting electrons. 2. What made Bohr quantise angular momentum (second postulate) and not some other quantity? Note, h has dimensions of angular momentum, and for circular orbits, angular momentum is a very relevant quantity. The second postulate is then so natural! 3. The orbital picture in Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom was inconsistent with the u quantum mechanics in which Bohr’s orbits are regions where the electron may be found with large probability. 4. Unlike the situation in the solar system, where planet-planet gravitational forces are very small as compared to the gravitational force of the sun on each planet (because the mass of the sun is so much greater than the mass of any of the planets), the electron-electron electric force interaction is comparable in magnitude to the electron- nucleus electrical force, because the charges and distances are of the same order of magnitude. This is the reason why the Bohr’s model with its planet-like electron is not applicable to many electron atoms. 5. Bohr laid the foundation of the quantum theory by postulating specific orbits in which electrons do not radiate. Bohr’s model include only one quantum number n. The new theory called quantum mechanics supports Bohr’s postulate. However in quantum mechanics (more generally accepted), a given energy level may not correspond to just one quantum state. For example, a state is characterised by four quantum numbers (n, l, m, and s), but for a pure Coulomb potential (as in hydrogen atom) the energy depends only on n. 6. In Bohr model, contrary to ordinary classical expectation, the frequency of revolution of an electron in its orbit is not connected to the frequency of spectral line. The later is the difference between two orbital energies divided by h. For transitions between large quantum numbers (n to n – 1, n very large), however, the two coincide as expected. 7. Bohr’s semiclassical model based on some aspects of classical physics and some aspects of modern physics also does not provide a true picture of the simplest hydrogenic atoms. The true picture is quantum mechanical affair which differs from Bohr model in a number of fundamental ways. But then if the Bohr model is not strictly correct, why do we bother about it? The reasons which make Bohr’s model still useful are: Reprint 2025-26 Atoms (i) The model is based on just three postulates but accounts for almost all the general features of the hydrogen spectrum. (ii) The model incorporates many of the concepts we have learnt in classical physics. (iii) The model demonstrates how a theoretical physicist occasionally must quite literally ignore certain problems of approach in hopes of being able to make some predictions. If the predictions of the theory or model agree with experiment, a theoretician then must somehow hope to explain away or rationalise the problems that were ignored along the way. EXERCISES

12.9 In accordance with the Bohr’s model, find the quantum number that characterises the earth’s revolution around the sun in an orbit of radius 1.5 × 1011 m with orbital speed 3 × 104 m/s. (Mass of earth 305 = 6.0 × 1024 kg.) Reprint 2025-26 Physics Chapter Thirteen NUCLEI 13.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous chapter, we have learnt that in every atom, the positive charge and mass are densely concentrated at the centre of the atom forming its nucleus. The overall dimensions of a nucleus are much smaller than those of an atom. Experiments on scattering of a-particles demonstrated that the radius of a nucleus was smaller than the radius of an atom by a factor of about 104. This means the volume of a nucleus is about 10–12 times the volume of the atom. In other words, an atom is almost empty. If an atom is enlarged to the size of a classroom, the nucleus would be of the size of pinhead. Nevertheless, the nucleus contains most (more than 99.9%) of the mass of an atom. Does the nucleus have a structure, just as the atom does? If so, what are the constituents of the nucleus? How are these held together? In this chapter, we shall look for answers to such questions. We shall discuss various properties of nuclei such as their size, mass and stability, and also associated nuclear phenomena such as radioactivity, fission and fusion. 13.2 ATOMIC MASSES AND COMPOSITION OF NUCLEUS The mass of an atom is very small, compared to a kilogram; for example, the mass of a carbon atom, 12C, is 1.992647 × 10–26 kg. Kilogram is not 306 a very convenient unit to measure such small quantities. Therefore, a Reprint 2025-26 Nuclei different mass unit is used for expressing atomic masses. This unit is the atomic mass unit (u), defined as 1/12th of the mass of the carbon (12C) atom. According to this definition mass of one 12 C atom 1u = 12 1.992647 × 10 −26 kg = 12 = 1.660539 × 10 −27 kg (13.1) The atomic masses of various elements expressed in atomic mass unit (u) are close to being integral multiples of the mass of a hydrogen atom. There are, however, many striking exceptions to this rule. For example, the atomic mass of chlorine atom is 35.46 u. Accurate measurement of atomic masses is carried out with a mass spectrometer, The measurement of atomic masses reveals the existence of different types of atoms of the same element, which exhibit the same chemical properties, but differ in mass. Such atomic species of the same element differing in mass are called isotopes. (In Greek, isotope means the same place, i.e. they occur in the same place in the periodic table of elements.) It was found that practically every element consists of a mixture of several isotopes. The relative abundance of different isotopes differs from element to element. Chlorine, for example, has two isotopes having masses 34.98 u and 36.98 u, which are nearly integral multiples of the mass of a hydrogen atom. The relative abundances of these isotopes are

6.12 ANGULAR MOMENTUM IN CASE OF For computing the total angular momentum ROTATION ABOUT A FIXED AXIS of the whole rigid body, we add up the contribution of each particle of the body. We have studied in section 6.7, the angular momentum of a system of particles. We already Thus know from there that the time rate of total We denote by L ⊥ and L z the components of angular momentum of a system of particles L respectively perpendicular to the z-axis andabout a point is equal to the total external torque along the z-axis;on the system taken about the same point. When OC i × m i v i (6.42a)the total external torque is zero, the total angular L ⊥= ∑ momentum of the system is conserved. where mi and vi are respectively the mass and We now wish to study the angular momentum the velocity of the ith particle and Ci is the centrein the special case of rotation about a fixed axis. of the circle described by the particle; The general expression for the total angular momentum of the system of n particles is N and ˆ (6.42b) L = =∑i 1 ri × p i (6.25b) or L z = Iωk We first consider the angular momentum of The last step follows since the perpendicular a typical particle of the rotating rigid body. We distance of the ith particle from the axis is ri; andthen sum up the contributions of individual by definition the moment of inertia of the body particles to get L of the whole body. m i ri2 . For a typical particle l = r × p. As seen in the about the axis of rotation is I =∑ last section r = OP = OC + CP [Fig. 6.17(b)]. With Note L = L z + L ⊥ (6.42c)p = m v , l = ( OC × m v ) + ( CP × m v ) The rigid bodies which we have mainly considered in this chapter are symmetric about The magnitude of the linear velocity v of the the axis of rotation, i.e. the axis of rotation is particle at P is given by v = ωr⊥ where r⊥ is the one of their symmetry axes. For such bodies, for length of CP or the perpendicular distance of P a given OCi, for every particle which has a from the axis of rotation. Further, v is tangential velocity vi , there is another particle of velocity at P to the circle which the particle describes. –vi located diametrically opposite on the circle Using the right-hand rule one can check that with centre Ci described by the particle. TogetherCP × v is parallel to the fixed axis. The unit vector along the fixed axis (chosen as the z-axis) such pairs will contribute zero to L ⊥ and as a is ˆk . Hence result for symmetric bodies L ⊥ is zero, and CP × m v = r⊥ (mv ) kˆ hence z = Iωkˆ (6.42d) = mr⊥2ω kˆ (since υ = ωr⊥ ) L = L Similarly, we can check that OC × v is For bodies, which are not symmetric about perpendicular to the fixed axis. Let us denote the axis of rotation, L is not equal to Lz and hence the part of l along the fixed axis (i.e. the z-axis) L does not lie along the axis of rotation. by lz, then Referring to Table 6.1, can you tell in which l z = CP × m v = mr⊥2ωkˆ cases L = Lz will not apply? Let us differentiate Eq. (6.42b). Since ˆk is a and l = l z + OC × m v fixed (constant) vector, we get We note that lz is parallel to the fixed axis, ˆbut l is not. In general, for a particle, the angular I ω) k d ( L z ) =  d (  d t momentum l is not along the axis of rotation, d t i.e. for a particle, l and ω are not necessarily Now, Eq. (6.28b) states parallel. Compare this with the corresponding dL fact in translation. For a particle, p and v are = τ dtalways parallel to each other. Reprint 2025-26 122 PHYSICS As we have seen in the last section, only We have already derived this equation using those components of the external torques which the work - kinetic energy route. are along the axis of rotation, need to be taken into account, when we discuss rotation about a 6.12.1 Conservation of angular momentum fixed axis. This means we can take τ = τkˆ . We are now in a position to revisit the principle of conservation of angular momentum in the Since L = L z + L ⊥ and the direction of Lz (vector context of rotation about a fixed axis. From Eq. ˆk ) is fixed, it follows that for rotation about a (6.43c), if the external torque is zero, fixed axis, Lz = Iω = constant (6.44) For symmetric bodies, from Eq. (6.42d), Lz d L z = τkˆ (6.43a) may be replaced by L .(L and Lz are respectively d t the magnitudes of L and Lz.) This then is the required form, for fixed axis d L rotation, of Eq. (6.29a), which expresses theand ⊥= 0 (6.43b) dt general law of conservation of angular momentum Thus, for rotation about a fixed axis, the of a system of particles. Eq. (6.44) applies to many component of angular momentum perpendicular situations that we come across in daily life. You may do this experiment with your friend. Sit on a to the fixed axis is constant. As L z = Iωkˆ , we swivel chair (a chair with a seat, free to rotate get from Eq. (6.43a), about a pivot) with your arms folded and feet not resting on, i.e., away from, the ground. Ask your d ( Iω) = τ (6.43c) friend to rotate the chair rapidly. While the chair d t is rotating with considerable angular speed If the moment of inertia I does not change with stretch your arms horizontally. What happens? time, Your angular speed is reduced. If you bring back d dω your arms closer to your body, the angular speed ( Iω) = I = Iα increases again. This is a situation where thed t d t principle of conservation of angular momentumand we get from Eq. (6.43c), is applicable. If friction in the rotational τ = I α (6.41) Fig 6.32 (a) A demonstration of conservation of Fig 6.32 (b) An acrobat employing the principle of angular momentum. A girl sits on a conservation of angular momentum in swivel chair and stretches her arms/ her performance. brings her arms closer to the body. Reprint 2025-26 SYSTEMS OF PARTICLES AND ROTATIONAL MOTION 123 mechanism is neglected, there is no external A circus acrobat and a diver take advantage torque about the axis of rotation of the chair and of this principle. Also, skaters and classical, hence Iω is constant. Stretching the arms Indian or western, dancers performing a increases I about the axis of rotation, resulting in pirouette (a spinning about a tip–top) on the toes decreasing the angular speed ω. Bringing the of one foot display ‘mastery’ over this principle. arms closer to the body has the opposite effect. Can you explain? SUMMARY 1. Ideally, a rigid body is one for which the distances between different particles of the body do not change, even though there are forces on them. 2. A rigid body fixed at one point or along a line can have only rotational motion. A rigid body not fixed in some way can have either pure translational motion or a combination of translational and rotational motions. 3. In rotation about a fixed axis, every particle of the rigid body moves in a circle which lies in a plane perpendicular to the axis and has its centre on the axis. Every Point in the rotating rigid body has the same angular velocity at any instant of time. 4. In pure translation, every particle of the body moves with the same velocity at any instant of time. 5. Angular velocity is a vector. Its magnitude is ω = dθ/dt and it is directed along the axis of rotation. For rotation about a fixed axis, this vector ω has a fixed direction. 6. The vector or cross product of two vector a and b is a vector written as a×b. The magnitude of this vector is absinθ and its direction is given by the right handed screw or the right hand rule. 7. The linear velocity of a particle of a rigid body rotating about a fixed axis is given by v = ω × r, where r is the position vector of the particle with respect to an origin along the fixed axis. The relation applies even to more general rotation of a rigid body with one point fixed. In that case r is the position vector of the particle with respect to the fixed point taken as the origin. 8. The centre of mass of a system of n particles is defined as the point whose position vector is ri ∑m i R = M 9. Velocity of the centre of mass of a system of particles is given by V = P/M, where P is the linear momentum of the system. The centre of mass moves as if all the mass of the system is concentrated at this point and all the external forces act at it. If the total external force on the system is zero, then the total linear momentum of the system is constant. 10. The angular momentum of a system of n particles about the origin is n L = ri × pi i =∑1 The torque or moment of force on a system of n particles about the origin is τ = ∑ri × Fi 1 The force Fi acting on the ith particle includes the external as well as internal forces. Assuming Newton’s third law of motion and that forces between any two particles act along the line joining the particles, we can show τint = 0 and Reprint 2025-26 124 PHYSICS dL = τ ext dt 11. A rigid body is in mechanical equilibrium if (1) it is in translational equilibrium, i.e., the total external force on it is zero : Fi = 0 , ∑ and (2) it is in rotational equilibrium, i.e. the total external torque on it is zero : Fi = 0 . ∑ τi = ∑ri × 12. The centre of gravity of an extended body is that point where the total gravitational torque on the body is zero. 13. The moment of intertia of a rigid body about an axis is defined by the formula I m i ri2 =∑ where ri is the perpendicular distance of the ith point of the body from the axis. The 1 2 kinetic energy of rotation is K = Iω . 2 POINTS TO PONDER 1. To determine the motion of the centre of mass of a system no knowledge of internal forces of the system is required. For this purpose we need to know only the external forces on the body. 2. Separating the motion of a system of particles as the motion of the centre of mass, (i.e., the translational motion of the system) and motion about (i.e. relative to) the centre of mass of the system is a useful technique in dynamics of a system of particles. One example of this technique is separating the kinetic energy of a system of particles K as the kinetic energy of the system about its centre of mass K′ and the kinetic energy of the centre of mass MV2/2, K = K′ + MV2/2 3. Newton’s Second Law for finite sized bodies (or systems of particles) is based in Newton’s Second Law and also Newton’s Third Law for particles. 4. To establish that the time rate of change of the total angular momentum of a system of particles is the total external torque in the system, we need not only Newton’s second law for particles, but also Newton’s third law with the provision that the forces between any two particles act along the line joining the particles. 5. The vanishing of the total external force and the vanishing of the total external torque are independent conditions. We can have one without the other. In a couple, total external force is zero, but total torque is non-zero. 6. The total torque on a system is independent of the origin if the total external force is zero. 7. The centre of gravity of a body coincides with its centre of mass only if the gravitational field does not vary from one part of the body to the other. Reprint 2025-26 SYSTEMS OF PARTICLES AND ROTATIONAL MOTION 125 8. The angular momentum L and the angular velocity ω are not necessarily parallel vectors. However, for the simpler situations discussed in this chapter when rotation is about a fixed axis which is an axis of symmetry of the rigid body, the relation L = Iω holds good, where I is the moment of the inertia of the body about the rotation axis. EXERCISES 6.1 Give the location of the centre of mass of a (i) sphere, (ii) cylinder, (iii) ring, and (iv) cube, each of uniform mass density. Does the centre of mass of a body necessarily lie inside the body ? 6.2 In the HCl molecule, the separation between the nuclei of the two atoms is about 1.27 Å (1 Å = 10-10 m). Find the approximate location of the CM of the molecule, given that a chlorine atom is about 35.5 times as massive as a hydrogen atom and nearly all the mass of an atom is concentrated in its nucleus. 6.3 A child sits stationary at one end of a long trolley moving uniformly with a speed V on a smooth horizontal floor. If the child gets up and runs about on the trolley in any manner, what is the speed of the CM of the (trolley + child) system ? 6.4 Show that the area of the triangle contained between the vectors a and b is one half of the magnitude of a × b. 6.5 Show that a.(b × c) is equal in magnitude to the volume of the parallelepiped formed on the three vectors , a, b and c. 6.6 Find the components along the x, y, z axes of the angular momentum l of a particle, whose position vector is r with components x, y, z and momentum is p with components px, py and pz. Show that if the particle moves only in the x-y plane the angular momentum has only a z-component. 6.7 Two particles, each of mass m and speed v, travel in opposite directions along parallel lines separated by a distance d. Show that the angular momentum vector of the two particle system is the same whatever be the point about which the angular momentum is taken. 6.8 A non-uniform bar of weight W is suspended at rest by two strings of negligible weight as shown in Fig.6.33. The angles made by the strings with the vertical are 36.9° and 53.1° respectively. The bar is 2 m long. Calculate the distance d of the centre of gravity of the bar from its left end. Fig. 6.33 6.9 A car weighs 1800 kg. The distance between its front and back axles is 1.8 m. Its centre of gravity is 1.05 m behind the front axle. Determine the force exerted by the level ground on each front wheel and each back wheel. Reprint 2025-26 126 PHYSICS 6.10 Torques of equal magnitude are applied to a hollow cylinder and a solid sphere, both having the same mass and radius. The cylinder is free to rotate about its standard axis of symmetry, and the sphere is free to rotate about an axis passing through its centre. Which of the two will acquire a greater angular speed after a given time. 6.11 A solid cylinder of mass 20 kg rotates about its axis with angular speed 100 rad s-1. The radius of the cylinder is 0.25 m. What is the kinetic energy associated with the rotation of the cylinder? What is the magnitude of angular momentum of the cylinder about its axis? 6.12 (a) A child stands at the centre of a turntable with his two arms outstretched. The turntable is set rotating with an angular speed of 40 rev/min. How much is the angular speed of the child if he folds his hands back and thereby reduces his moment of inertia to 2/5 times the initial value ? Assume that the turntable rotates without friction. (b) Show that the child’s new kinetic energy of rotation is more than the initial kinetic energy of rotation. How do you account for this increase in kinetic energy? 6.13 A rope of negligible mass is wound round a hollow cylinder of mass 3 kg and radius 40 cm. What is the angular acceleration of the cylinder if the rope is pulled with a force of 30 N ? What is the linear acceleration of the rope ? Assume that there is no slipping. 6.14 To maintain a rotor at a uniform angular speed of 200 rad s-1, an engine needs to transmit a torque of 180 N m. What is the power required by the engine ? (Note: uniform angular velocity in the absence of friction implies zero torque. In practice, applied torque is needed to counter frictional torque). Assume that the engine is 100% efficient. 6.15 From a uniform disk of radius R, a circular hole of radius R/2 is cut out. The centre of the hole is at R/2 from the centre of the original disc. Locate the centre of gravity of the resulting flat body. 6.16 A metre stick is balanced on a knife edge at its centre. When two coins, each of mass 5 g are put one on top of the other at the 12.0 cm mark, the stick is found to be balanced at 45.0 cm. What is the mass of the metre stick? 6.17 The oxygen molecule has a mass of 5.30 × 10-26 kg and a moment of inertia of 1.94 ×10-46 kg m2 about an axis through its centre perpendicular to the lines joining the two atoms. Suppose the mean speed of such a molecule in a gas is 500 m/s and that its kinetic energy of rotation is two thirds of its kinetic energy of translation. Find the average angular velocity of the molecule. Reprint 2025-26 CHAPTER SEVEN GRAVITATION 7.1 INTRODUCTION Early in our lives, we become aware of the tendency of all material objects to be attracted towards the earth. Anything