2.4 A spherical conductor of radius 12 cm has a charge of 1.6 × 10–7C distributed uniformly on its surface. What is the electric field (a) inside the sphere (b) just outside the sphere (c) at a point 18 cm from the centre of the sphere?

1.20 A conducting sphere of radius 10 cm has an unknown charge. If the electric field 20 cm from the centre of the sphere is 1.5 × 103 N/C and points radially inward, what is the net charge on the sphere? 43 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1.21 A uniformly charged conducting sphere of 2.4 m diameter has a surface charge density of 80.0 mC/m2. (a) Find the charge on the sphere. (b) What is the total electric flux leaving the surface of the sphere? 1.22 An infinite line charge produces a field of 9 × 104 N/C at a distance of 2 cm. Calculate the linear charge density. 1.23 Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On their inner faces, the plates have surface charge densities of opposite signs and of magnitude 17.0 × 10–22 C/m2. What is E: (a) in the outer region of the first plate, (b) in the outer region of the second plate, and (c) between the plates? Reprint 2025-26 Chapter Two ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL AND CAPACITANCE 2.12.12.12.12.1 IIINTRODUCTIONIINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION In Chapters 5 and 7 (Class XI), the notion of potential energy was introduced. When an external force does work in taking a body from a point to another against a force like spring force or gravitational force, that work gets stored as potential energy of the body. When the external force is removed, the body moves, gaining kinetic energy and losing an equal amount of potential energy. The sum of kinetic and potential energies is thus conserved. Forces of this kind are called conservative forces. Spring force and gravitational force are examples of conservative forces. Coulomb force between two (stationary) charges is also a conservative force. This is not surprising, since both have inverse-square dependence on distance and differ mainly in the proportionality constants – the masses in the gravitational law are replaced by charges in Coulomb’s law. Thus, like the potential energy of a mass in a gravitational field, we can define electrostatic potential energy of a charge in an electrostatic field. Consider an electrostatic field EEEEE due to some charge configuration. First, for simplicity, consider the field E due to a charge Q placed at the origin. Now, imagine that we bring a test charge q from a point R to a point P against the repulsive force on it due to the charge Q. With reference Reprint 2025-26 Physics to Fig. 2.1, this will happen if Q and q are both positive or both negative. For definiteness, let us take Q, q > 0. Two remarks may be made here. First, we assume that the test charge q is so small that it does not disturb the original configuration, namely the charge Q at the origin (or else, we keep Q fixed at the origin by some unspecified force). Second, in bringing the charge q fromFIGURE 2.1 A test charge q (> 0) is moved from the point R to the R to P, we apply an external force Fext just enough to point P against the repulsive counter the repulsive electric force FE (i.e, Fext= –FE). force on it by the charge Q (> 0) This means there is no net force on or acceleration of placed at the origin. the charge q when it is brought from R to P, i.e., it is brought with infinitesimally slow constant speed. In this situation, work done by the external force is the negative of the work done by the electric force, and gets fully stored in the form of potential energy of the charge q. If the external force is removed on reaching P, the electric force will take the charge away from Q – the stored energy (potential energy) at P is used to provide kinetic energy to the charge q in such a way that the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is conserved. Thus, work done by external forces in moving a charge q from R to P is WRP = – = (2.1) This work done is against electrostatic repulsive force and gets stored as potential energy. At every point in electric field, a particle with charge q possesses a certain electrostatic potential energy, this work done increases its potential energy by an amount equal to potential energy difference between points R and P. Thus, potential energy difference ∆U = U P − U R = W RP (2.2) (Note here that this displacement is in an opposite sense to the electric force and hence work done by electric field is negative, i.e., –WRP .) Therefore, we can define electric potential energy difference between two points as the work required to be done by an external force in moving (without accelerating) charge q from one point to another for electric field of any arbitrary charge configuration. Two important comments may be made at this stage: (i) The right side of Eq. (2.2) depends only on the initial and final positions of the charge. It means that the work done by an electrostatic field in moving a charge from one point to another depends only on the initial and the final points and is independent of the path taken to go from one point to the other. This is the fundamental characteristic of a conservative force. The concept of the potential energy would not be meaningful if the work depended on the path. The path-independence of work done by an electrostatic field can be proved using the 46 Coulomb’s law. We omit this proof here. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (ii) Equation (2.2) defines potential energy difference in terms of the physically meaningful quantity work. Clearly, potential energy so defined is undetermined to within an additive constant.What this means is that the actual value of potential energy is not physically significant; it is only the difference of potential energy that is significant. We can always add an arbitrary constant a to potential energy at every point, since this will not change the potential energy difference: (U P + α) − (U R + α) = U P − U R Put it differently, there is a freedom in choosing the point where potential energy is zero. A convenient choice is to have electrostatic potential energy zero at infinity. With this choice, if we take the point R at infinity, we get from Eq. (2.2) Count Alessandro Volta (1745 – 1827) Italian W ∞ P = U P − U ∞ = U P (2.3) physicist, professor at Since the point P is arbitrary, Eq. (2.3) provides us with a Pavia. Volta established that the animal electri- COUNTdefinition of potential energy of a charge q at any point. city observed by LuigiPotential energy of charge q at a point (in the presence of field Galvani, 1737–1798, indue to any charge configuration) is the work done by the experiments with frog external force (equal and opposite to the electric force) in muscle tissue placed in bringing the charge q from infinity to that point. contact with dissimilar metals, was not due to 2.2 ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL any exceptional property of animal tissues but ALESSANDROConsider any general static charge configuration. We define was also generated potential energy of a test charge q in terms of the work done whenever any wet body on the charge q. This work is obviously proportional to q, since was sandwiched between the force at any point is qE, where E is the electric field at that dissimilar metals. This VOLTA point due to the given charge configuration. It is, therefore, led him to develop the convenient to divide the work by the amount of charge q, so first voltaic pile, orthat the resulting quantity is independent of q. In other words, battery, consisting of a (1745 work done per unit test charge is characteristic of the electric large stack of moist disks of cardboard (electro-field associated with the charge configuration. This leads to lyte) sandwiched the idea of electrostatic potential V due to a given charge between disks of metal –1827) configuration. From Eq. (2.1), we get: (electrodes). Work done by external force in bringing a unit positive charge from point R to P  U P − U R  = VP – VR = (2.4)  q  where VP and VR are the electrostatic potentials at P and R, respectively. Note, as before, that it is not the actual value of potential but the potential difference that is physically significant. If, as before, we choose the potential to be zero at infinity, Eq. (2.4) implies: Work done by an external force in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to a point = electrostatic potential (V ) at that point. 47 Reprint 2025-26 Physics In other words, the electrostatic potential (V ) at any point in a region with electrostatic field is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge (without acceleration) from infinity to that point. The qualifying remarks made earlier regarding potential energy also apply to the definition of potential. To obtain the work done per unit test charge, we should take an infinitesimal test charge FIGURE 2.2 Work done on a test charge q dq, obtain the work done dW in bringing it from by the electrostatic field due to any given infinity to the point and determine the ratio charge configuration is independent dW/dq. Also, the external force at every point of the of the path, and depends only on path is to be equal and opposite to the electrostatic its initial and final positions. force on the test charge at that point. 2.3 POTENTIAL DUE TO A POINT CHARGE Consider a point charge Q at the origin (Fig. 2.3). For definiteness, take Q to be positive. We wish to determine the potential at any point P with position vector r from the origin. For that we must calculate the work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the point P. For Q > 0, the work done against the repulsive force on the test charge is positive. Since work done is independent of the path, we choose a convenient path – along the radial direction from infinity to the point P. At some intermediate point P¢ on the path, the electrostatic force on a unit positive charge is FIGURE 2.3 Work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the Q × 1 rˆ ′ (2.5) point P, against the repulsive force of 2 4 πε0r ' charge Q (Q > 0), is the potential at P due to the charge Q. where ˆ′r is the unit vector along OP¢. Work done against this force from r¢ to r¢ + Dr¢ is Q ∆W = − 2 ∆′r (2.6) 4 πε0r ' The negative sign appears because for Dr¢ < 0, DW is positive. Total work done (W) by the external force is obtained by integrating Eq. (2.6) from r¢ = ¥ to r¢ = r, r Q Q r Q = dr ′ = ε 0r ′ 2 4 πε0r ′ ∞ 4 πε0r (2.7) W = − ∫4∞ π This, by definition is the potential at P due to the charge Q Q V (r ) = (2.8) 48 4 πε0r Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance Equation (2.8) is true for any sign of the charge Q, though we considered Q > 0 in its derivation. For Q < 0, V < 0, i.e., work done (by the external force) per unit positive test charge in bringing it from infinity to the point is negative. This is equivalent to saying that work done by the electrostatic force in bringing the unit positive charge form infinity to the point P is positive. [This is as it should be, since for Q < 0, the force on a unit positive test charge is attractive, so that the electrostatic force and the displacement (from infinity to P) are FIGURE 2.4 Variation of potential V with r [in units of in the same direction.] Finally, we (Q/4pe0) m-1] (blue curve) and field with r [in units of (Q/4pe0) m-2] (black curve) for a point charge Q.note that Eq. (2.8) is consistent with the choice that potential at infinity be zero. Figure (2.4) shows how the electrostatic potential ( 1/r) and the electrostatic field (1/r 2 ) varies with r. Example 2.1 (a) Calculate the potential at a point P due to a charge of 4 × 10–7C located 9 cm away. (b) Hence obtain the work done in bringing a charge of 2 × 10–9 C from infinity to the point P. Does the answer depend on the path along which the charge is brought? Solution (a) = 4 × 104 V (b) W = qV = 2 × 10–9C × 4 × 104V = 8 × 10–5 J No, work done will be path independent. Any arbitrary infinitesimal path can be resolved into two perpendicular displacements: One along EXAMPLE r and another perpendicular to r. The work done corresponding to the later will be zero. 2.1

2.9 ELECTROSTATICS OF CONDUCTORS Conductors and insulators were described briefly in Chapter 1. Conductors contain mobile charge carriers. In metallic conductors, these charge carriers are electrons. In a metal, the outer (valence) electrons part away from their atoms and are free to move. These electrons are free within the metal but not free to leave the metal. The free electrons form a kind of ‘gas’; they collide with each other and with the ions, and move randomly in different directions. In an external electric field, they drift against the direction of the field. The positive ions made up of the nuclei and the bound electrons remain held in their fixed positions. In electrolytic 61conductors, the charge carriers are both positive and negative ions; but Reprint 2025-26 Physics the situation in this case is more involved – the movement of the charge carriers is affected both by the external electric field as also by the so-called chemical forces (see Chapter 3). We shall restrict our discussion to metallic solid conductors. Let us note important results regarding electrostatics of conductors. 1. Inside a conductor, electrostatic field is zero Consider a conductor, neutral or charged. There may also be an external electrostatic field. In the static situation, when there is no current inside or on the surface of the conductor, the electric field is zero everywhere inside the conductor. This fact can be taken as the defining property of a conductor. A conductor has free electrons. As long as electric field is not zero, the free charge carriers would experience force and drift. In the static situation, the free charges have so distributed themselves that the electric field is zero everywhere inside. Electrostatic field is zero inside a conductor. 2. At the surface of a charged conductor, electrostatic field must be normal to the surface at every point If E were not normal to the surface, it would have some non-zero component along the surface. Free charges on the surface of the conductor would then experience force and move. In the static situation, therefore, E should have no tangential component. Thus electrostatic field at the surface of a charged conductor must be normal to the surface at every point. (For a conductor without any surface charge density, field is zero even at the surface.) See result 5. 3. The interior of a conductor can have no excess charge in the static situation A neutral conductor has equal amounts of positive and negative charges in every small volume or surface element. When the conductor is charged, the excess charge can reside only on the surface in the static situation. This follows from the Gauss’s law. Consider any arbitrary volume element v inside a conductor. On the closed surface S bounding the volume element v, electrostatic field is zero. Thus the total electric flux through S is zero. Hence, by Gauss’s law, there is no net charge enclosed by S. But the surface S can be made as small as you like, i.e., the volume v can be made vanishingly small. This means there is no net charge at any point inside the conductor, and any excess charge must reside at the surface. 4. Electrostatic potential is constant throughout the volume of the conductor and has the same value (as inside) on its surface This follows from results 1 and 2 above. Since E = 0 inside the conductor and has no tangential component on the surface, no work is done in moving a small test charge within the conductor and on its surface. That is, there is no potential difference between any two points inside or on 62 the surface of the conductor. Hence, the result. If the conductor is charged, Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance electric field normal to the surface exists; this means potential will be different for the surface and a point just outside the surface. In a system of conductors of arbitrary size, shape and charge configuration, each conductor is characterised by a constant value of potential, but this constant may differ from one conductor to the other. 5. Electric field at the surface of a charged conductor σ E = nˆ (2.35) ε0 where s is the surface charge density and ˆn is a unit vector normal to the surface in the outward direction. To derive the result, choose a pill box (a short cylinder) as the Gaussian surface about any point P on the surface, as shown in Fig. 2.17. The pill box is partly inside and partly outside the surface of the conductor. It has a small area of cross section d S and negligible height. Just inside the surface, the electrostatic field is zero; just outside, the field is normal to the surface with magnitude E. Thus, the contribution to the total flux through the pill box comes only from the outside (circular) cross-section of the pill box. This equals ± EdS (positive for s > 0, negative for s < 0), since over the small area dS, E may be considered constant and E and dS are parallel or antiparallel. The charge enclosed by the pill box is sdS. By Gauss’s law σδS EdS = ε0 σ E = (2.36) ε0 Including the fact that electric field is normal to the FIGURE 2.17 The Gaussian surface surface, we get the vector relation, Eq. (2.35), which (a pill box) chosen to derive Eq. (2.35) is true for both signs of s. For s > 0, electric field is for electric field at the surface of a normal to the surface outward; for s < 0, electric field charged conductor. is normal to the surface inward. 6. Electrostatic shielding Consider a conductor with a cavity, with no charges inside the cavity. A remarkable result is that the electric field inside the cavity is zero, whatever be the size and shape of the cavity and whatever be the charge on the conductor and the external fields in which it might be placed. We have proved a simple case of this result already: the electric field inside a charged spherical shell is zero. The proof of the result for the shell makes use of the spherical symmetry of the shell (see Chapter 1). But the vanishing of electric field in the (charge-free) cavity of a conductor is, as mentioned above, a very general result. A related result is that even if the conductor 63 Reprint 2025-26 Physics is charged or charges are induced on a neutral conductor by an external field, all charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor with cavity. The proofs of the results noted in Fig. 2.18 are omitted here, but we note their important implication. Whatever be the charge and field configuration outside, any cavity in a conductor remains shielded from outside electric influence: the field inside the cavity is always zero. This is known as electrostatic shielding. The effect can be made use of in protecting sensitive instruments from FIGURE 2.18 The electric field inside a outside electrical influence. Figure 2.19 gives a cavity of any conductor is zero. All summary of the important electrostatic properties charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor.of a conductor with cavity. (There are no charges placed in the cavity.) FIGURE 2.19 Some important electrostatic properties of a conductor. Example 2.7 (a) A comb run through one’s dry hair attracts small bits of paper. Why? What happens if the hair is wet or if it is a rainy day? (Remember, a paper does not conduct electricity.) (b) Ordinary rubber is an insulator. But special rubber tyres of aircraft are made slightly conducting. Why is this necessary? (c) Vehicles carrying inflammable materials usually have metallic ropes touching the ground during motion. Why? (d) A bird perches on a bare high power line, and nothing happens to the bird. A man standing on the ground touches the same line and gets a fatal shock. Why? Solution (a) This is because the comb gets charged by friction. The molecules 2.7 in the paper gets polarised by the charged comb, resulting in a net force of attraction. If the hair is wet, or if it is rainy day, friction between hair and the comb reduces. The comb does not get EXAMPLE charged and thus it will not attract small bits of paper. 64 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (b) To enable them to conduct charge (produced by friction) to the ground; as too much of static electricity accumulated may result in spark and result in fire. EXAMPLE (c) Reason similar to (b). (d) Current passes only when there is difference in potential. 2.7