7.5 ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY OF THE EARTH 4π 3 density and hence its mass is M E = R E ρ 3 The earth can be imagined to be a sphere made where ME is the mass of the earth RE is its radiusof a large number of concentric spherical shells and ρ is the density. On the other hand thewith the smallest one at the centre and the largest one at its surface. A point outside the 4π 3 ρr and mass of the sphere Mr of radius r isearth is obviously outside all the shells. Thus, 3 Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 133 hence its distance from the centre of the earth is (RE + h ). If F (h) denoted the magnitude of the force on the point mass m , we get from G m M E Eq. (7.5) : = 3 r (7.10) R E If the mass m is situated on the surface of GM E m F (h ) = earth, then r = RE and the gravitational force on ( R E + h )2 (7.13) it is, from Eq. (7.10) The acceleration experienced by the point M E m F = G 2 (7.11) mass is F (h )/ m ≡ g (h ) and we get R E The acceleration experienced by the mass F (h ) GM E . g (h ) = = (7.14)m, which is usually denoted by the symbol g is m ( R E + h )2 related to F by Newton’s 2nd law by relation This is clearly less than the value of g on the F = mg. Thus GM E . g = surface of earth : GM F For h << R E , we can E R E2 g = = 2 (7.12) m R E expand the RHS of Eq. (7.14) : E Acceleration g is readily measurable. RE is a g (h ) = 2 GM 2 = g (1 + h / R E )−2known quantity. The measurement of G by R E (1 + h / R E ) Cavendish’s experiment (or otherwise), combined h << 1 , using binomial expression,with knowledge of g and RE enables one to For R E estimate ME from Eq. (7.12). This is the reason  2h why there is a popular statement regarding g (h ) ≅ g 1 − . (7.15)Cavendish : “Cavendish weighed the earth”.  RE  7.6 ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY BELOW Equation (7.15) thus tells us that for small AND ABOVE THE SURFACE OF EARTH heights h above the value of g decreases by a factor (1 − 2h / R E ).Consider a point mass m at a height h above the Now, consider a point mass m at a depthsurface of the earth as shown in Fig. 7.8(a). The d below the surface of the earth (Fig. 7.8(b)),radius of the earth is denoted by RE . Since this so that its distance from the centre of thepoint is outside the earth, earth is ( R E − d ) as shown in the figure. The earth can be thought of as being composed of a smaller sphere of radius (RE – d ) and a spherical shell of thickness d. The force on m due to the outer shell of thickness d is zero because the result quoted in the previous section. As far as the smaller sphere of radius ( RE – d ) is concerned, the point mass is outside it and hence according to the result quoted earlier, the force due to this smaller sphere is just as if the entire mass of the smaller sphere is concentrated at the centre. If Ms is the mass of the smaller sphere, then, Ms/ME = ( RE – d)3 / RE3 ( 7.16) Since mass of a sphere is proportional to be Fig. 7.8 (a) g at a height h above the surface of the cube of its radius. earth. Reprint 2025-26 134 PHYSICS close to the surface of earth, at distances from the surface much smaller than the radius of the earth. In such cases, the force of gravity is practically a constant equal to mg, directed towards the centre of the earth. If we consider a Ms ME point at a height h1 from the surface of the earth and another point vertically above it at a height h2 from the surface, the work done in lifting the particle of mass m from the first to the second position is denoted by W12 Fig. 7.8 (b) g at a depth d. In this case only the smaller W12 = Force × displacement = mg (h2 – h1) (7.20) sphere of radius (RE–d) contributes to g. Thus the force on the point mass is If we associate a potential energy W(h) at a point at a height h above the surface such that F (d) = G Ms m / (RE – d ) 2 (7.17) W(h) = mgh + Wo (7.21) Substituting for Ms from above , we get (where Wo = constant) ; F (d) = G ME m ( RE – d ) / RE 3 (7.18) then it is clear that and hence the acceleration due to gravity at W12 = W(h2) – W(h1) (7.22) a depth d, The work done in moving the particle is just the difference of potential energy between its F ( d ) final and initial positions.Observe that the g(d) = is m constant Wo cancels out in Eq. (7.22). Setting h = 0 in the last equation, we get W ( h = 0 ) = Wo. F (d ) GM E g ( d ) = = 3 ( R E − d ) . h = 0 means points on the surface of the earth. m R E Thus, Wo is the potential energy on the surface of the earth. R E − d = g = g (1 − d / R E ) (7.19) If we consider points at arbitrary distance R E from the surface of the earth, the result just Thus, as we go down below earth’s surface, derived is not valid since the assumption that the acceleration due gravity decreases by a factor the gravitational force mg is a constant is no (1 − d / R E ). The remarkable thing about longer valid. However, from our discussion we know that a point outside the earth, the force of acceleration due to earth’s gravity is that it is gravitation on a particle directed towards the maximum on its surface decreasing whether you centre of the earth is go up or down. G ME m F = 2 (7.23)7.7 GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ENERGY r where ME = mass of earth, m = mass of theWe had discussed earlier the notion of potential particle and r its distance from the centre of theenergy as being the energy stored in the body at earth. If we now calculate the work done inits given position. If the position of the particle lifting a particle from r = r1 to r = r2 (r2 > r1) alongchanges on account of forces acting on it, then a vertical path, we get instead of Eq. (7.20) the change in its potential energy is just the amount of work done on the body by the force. r2 G M m W12 2 d rAs we had discussed earlier, forces for which the =∫r1 r work done is independent of the path are the conservative forces.  1 1  = − G M E m − (7.24) The force of gravity is a conservative force  r2 r1  and we can calculate the potential energy of a In place of Eq. (7.21), we can thus associate body arising out of this force, called the a potential energy W(r) at a distance r, such that gravitational potential energy. Consider points Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 135 G M E m W (r ) =− + W1 , (7.25) r valid for r > R , so that once again W12 = W(r2) – W(r1). Setting r = infinity in the last equation, we get W ( r = infinity ) = W1 . Thus, W1 is the potential energy at infinity. One should note that only the difference of potential energy between two points has a definite meaning from Eqs. (7.22) and (7.24). One conventionally sets W1 equal to zero, so that the potential energy at a point is just the amount of work done in displacing the particle from infinity to that point. We have calculated the potential energy at a point of a particle due to gravitational forces Fig. 7.9 on it due to the earth and it is proportional to the mass of the particle. The gravitational The gravitational potential at the centre of potential due to the gravitational force of the the square r = 2 l/2 is ( )earth is defined as the potential energy of a particle of unit mass at that point. From the G m U (r ) = − 4 2 . ⊳earlier discussion, we learn that the gravitational l potential energy associated with two particles of masses m1 and m2 separated by distance by a 7.8 ESCAPE SPEED distance r is given by If a stone is thrown by hand, we see it falls back Gm 1m 2 to the earth. Of course using machines we can V = – (if we choose V = 0 as r →∞) r shoot an object with much greater speeds and It should be noted that an isolated system of with greater and greater initial speed, the object particles will have the total potential energy that scales higher and higher heights. A natural equals the sum of energies (given by the above query that arises in our mind is the following: equation) for all possible pairs of its constituent ‘can we throw an object with such high initial particles. This is an example of the application speeds that it does not fall back to the earth?’ of the superposition principle. The principle of conservation of energy helps us to answer this question. Suppose the object ⊳ Example 7.3 Find the potential energy of did reach infinity and that its speed there was a system of four particles placed at the Vf. The energy of an object is the sum of potential vertices of a square of side l. Also obtain and kinetic energy. As before W1 denotes that the potential at the centre of the square. gravitational potential energy of the object at infinity. The total energy of the projectile at infinity then is Answer Consider four masses each of mass m at the corners of a square of side l; See Fig. 7.9. 2 mV fWe have four mass pairs at distance l and two E ( ∞=) W1 + (7.26) 2 diagonal pairs at distance 2 l If the object was thrown initially with a speed Hence, Vi from a point at a distance (h+RE) from the G m 2 G m 2 centre of the earth (RE = radius of the earth), its W (r ) = − 4 − 2 l 2 l energy initially was 2 2 1 2 GmM E 2 G m  1  G m E (h + R E ) = mVi – + W1 (7.27) 5.41 = − 2 (h + R E ) 2 +  = − l  l  2  Reprint 2025-26 136 PHYSICS By the principle of energy conservation ⊳ Eqs. (7.26) and (7.27) must be equal. Hence Example 7.4 Two uniform solid spheres 2 2 of equal radii R, but mass M and 4 M have mV f mVi GmM E a centre to centre separation 6 R, as shown – = (7.28) 2 (h + R E ) 2 in Fig. 7.10. The two spheres are held fixed. The R.H.S. is a positive quantity with a A projectile of mass m is projected from the minimum value zero hence so must be the L.H.S. surface of the sphere of mass M directly Thus, an object can reach infinity as long as Vi towards the centre of the second sphere. is such that Obtain an expression for the minimum speed v of the projectile so that it reaches mVi 2 GmM E the surface of the second sphere. – ≥ 0 (7.29) 2 (h + R E ) The minimum value of Vi corresponds to the case when the L.H.S. of Eq. (7.29) equals zero. Thus, the minimum speed required for an object to reach infinity (i.e. escape from the earth) Fig. 7.10corresponds to 1 2 GmM E Answer The projectile is acted upon by two m = (7.30) mutually opposing gravitational forces of the two ( Vi )min 2 h + R E spheres. The neutral point N (see Fig. 7.10) is defined as the position where the two forces If the object is thrown from the surface of cancel each other exactly. If ON = r, we have the earth, h = 0, and we get G M m 4 G M m = 2GM E r 2 (6 R −r )2 (Vi )min = (7.31) (6R – r)2 = 4r2 R E 6R – r = ±2r r = 2R or – 6R. 2 The neutral point r = – 6R does not concern Using the relation g = GM E / R E , we get us in this example. Thus ON = r = 2R. It is sufficient to project the particle with a speed (Vi )min = 2 gR E (7.32) which would enable it to reach N. Thereafter, the greater gravitational pull of 4M would suffice. The mechanical energy at the surface Using the value of g and RE, numerically of M is (Vi)min≈11.2 km/s. This is called the escape 1 2 G M m 4 G M mspeed, sometimes loosely called the escape E i = m v − − . velocity. 2 R 5 R Equation (7.32) applies equally well to an At the neutral point N, the speed approaches object thrown from the surface of the moon with zero. The mechanical energy at N is purely g replaced by the acceleration due to Moon’s potential. gravity on its surface and rE replaced by the G M m 4 G M m − EN = − .radius of the moon. Both are smaller than their 2 R 4 R values on earth and the escape speed for the From the principle of conservation of moon turns out to be 2.3 km/s, about five times mechanical energy smaller. This is the reason that moon has no atmosphere. Gas molecules if formed on the 1 2 GM 4GM GM GMsurface of the moon having velocities larger than v − − = − − this will escape the gravitational pull of the 2 R 5 R 2R R moon. or Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 137 + h) with speed V. Its 2 2 G M  4 1  traverses a distance 2π(RE v = − time period T therefore is R  5 2  2π( R E + h ) 2π( R E + h )3 / 2 T = = (7.37)  3 G M 1/2 V ⊳ G M E v =  5 R  on substitution of value of V from Eq. (7.35). A point to note is that the speed of the projectile Squaring both sides of Eq. (7.37), we get is zero at N, but is nonzero when it strikes the 2 T = k ( RE + h)3 (where k = 4 π2 / GME) (7.38)heavier sphere 4 M. The calculation of this speed is left as an exercise to the students. which is Kepler’s law of periods, as applied to motion of satellites around the earth. For a 7.9 EARTH SATELLITES satellite very close to the surface of earth h can be neglected in comparison to RE in Eq. (7.38). Earth satellites are objects which revolve around Hence, for such satellites, T is To, where the earth. Their motion is very similar to the motion of planets around the Sun and hence T 0 = 2π R E / g (7.39) Kepler’s laws of planetary motion are equally If we substitute the numerical values applicable to them. In particular, their orbits g ≃ 9.8 m s-2 and RE = 6400 km., we get around the earth are circular or elliptic. Moon is the only natural satellite of the earth with a near 6.4 × 10 6 T 0 = 2π s circular orbit with a time period of approximately 9.8

1.20 A conducting sphere of radius 10 cm has an unknown charge. If the electric field 20 cm from the centre of the sphere is 1.5 × 103 N/C and points radially inward, what is the net charge on the sphere? 43 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1.21 A uniformly charged conducting sphere of 2.4 m diameter has a surface charge density of 80.0 mC/m2. (a) Find the charge on the sphere. (b) What is the total electric flux leaving the surface of the sphere? 1.22 An infinite line charge produces a field of 9 × 104 N/C at a distance of 2 cm. Calculate the linear charge density. 1.23 Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On their inner faces, the plates have surface charge densities of opposite signs and of magnitude 17.0 × 10–22 C/m2. What is E: (a) in the outer region of the first plate, (b) in the outer region of the second plate, and (c) between the plates? Reprint 2025-26 Chapter Two ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL AND CAPACITANCE 2.12.12.12.12.1 IIINTRODUCTIONIINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION In Chapters 5 and 7 (Class XI), the notion of potential energy was introduced. When an external force does work in taking a body from a point to another against a force like spring force or gravitational force, that work gets stored as potential energy of the body. When the external force is removed, the body moves, gaining kinetic energy and losing an equal amount of potential energy. The sum of kinetic and potential energies is thus conserved. Forces of this kind are called conservative forces. Spring force and gravitational force are examples of conservative forces. Coulomb force between two (stationary) charges is also a conservative force. This is not surprising, since both have inverse-square dependence on distance and differ mainly in the proportionality constants – the masses in the gravitational law are replaced by charges in Coulomb’s law. Thus, like the potential energy of a mass in a gravitational field, we can define electrostatic potential energy of a charge in an electrostatic field. Consider an electrostatic field EEEEE due to some charge configuration. First, for simplicity, consider the field E due to a charge Q placed at the origin. Now, imagine that we bring a test charge q from a point R to a point P against the repulsive force on it due to the charge Q. With reference Reprint 2025-26 Physics to Fig. 2.1, this will happen if Q and q are both positive or both negative. For definiteness, let us take Q, q > 0. Two remarks may be made here. First, we assume that the test charge q is so small that it does not disturb the original configuration, namely the charge Q at the origin (or else, we keep Q fixed at the origin by some unspecified force). Second, in bringing the charge q fromFIGURE 2.1 A test charge q (> 0) is moved from the point R to the R to P, we apply an external force Fext just enough to point P against the repulsive counter the repulsive electric force FE (i.e, Fext= –FE). force on it by the charge Q (> 0) This means there is no net force on or acceleration of placed at the origin. the charge q when it is brought from R to P, i.e., it is brought with infinitesimally slow constant speed. In this situation, work done by the external force is the negative of the work done by the electric force, and gets fully stored in the form of potential energy of the charge q. If the external force is removed on reaching P, the electric force will take the charge away from Q – the stored energy (potential energy) at P is used to provide kinetic energy to the charge q in such a way that the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is conserved. Thus, work done by external forces in moving a charge q from R to P is WRP = – = (2.1) This work done is against electrostatic repulsive force and gets stored as potential energy. At every point in electric field, a particle with charge q possesses a certain electrostatic potential energy, this work done increases its potential energy by an amount equal to potential energy difference between points R and P. Thus, potential energy difference ∆U = U P − U R = W RP (2.2) (Note here that this displacement is in an opposite sense to the electric force and hence work done by electric field is negative, i.e., –WRP .) Therefore, we can define electric potential energy difference between two points as the work required to be done by an external force in moving (without accelerating) charge q from one point to another for electric field of any arbitrary charge configuration. Two important comments may be made at this stage: (i) The right side of Eq. (2.2) depends only on the initial and final positions of the charge. It means that the work done by an electrostatic field in moving a charge from one point to another depends only on the initial and the final points and is independent of the path taken to go from one point to the other. This is the fundamental characteristic of a conservative force. The concept of the potential energy would not be meaningful if the work depended on the path. The path-independence of work done by an electrostatic field can be proved using the 46 Coulomb’s law. We omit this proof here. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (ii) Equation (2.2) defines potential energy difference in terms of the physically meaningful quantity work. Clearly, potential energy so defined is undetermined to within an additive constant.What this means is that the actual value of potential energy is not physically significant; it is only the difference of potential energy that is significant. We can always add an arbitrary constant a to potential energy at every point, since this will not change the potential energy difference: (U P + α) − (U R + α) = U P − U R Put it differently, there is a freedom in choosing the point where potential energy is zero. A convenient choice is to have electrostatic potential energy zero at infinity. With this choice, if we take the point R at infinity, we get from Eq. (2.2) Count Alessandro Volta (1745 – 1827) Italian W ∞ P = U P − U ∞ = U P (2.3) physicist, professor at Since the point P is arbitrary, Eq. (2.3) provides us with a Pavia. Volta established that the animal electri- COUNTdefinition of potential energy of a charge q at any point. city observed by LuigiPotential energy of charge q at a point (in the presence of field Galvani, 1737–1798, indue to any charge configuration) is the work done by the experiments with frog external force (equal and opposite to the electric force) in muscle tissue placed in bringing the charge q from infinity to that point. contact with dissimilar metals, was not due to 2.2 ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL any exceptional property of animal tissues but ALESSANDROConsider any general static charge configuration. We define was also generated potential energy of a test charge q in terms of the work done whenever any wet body on the charge q. This work is obviously proportional to q, since was sandwiched between the force at any point is qE, where E is the electric field at that dissimilar metals. This VOLTA point due to the given charge configuration. It is, therefore, led him to develop the convenient to divide the work by the amount of charge q, so first voltaic pile, orthat the resulting quantity is independent of q. In other words, battery, consisting of a (1745 work done per unit test charge is characteristic of the electric large stack of moist disks of cardboard (electro-field associated with the charge configuration. This leads to lyte) sandwiched the idea of electrostatic potential V due to a given charge between disks of metal –1827) configuration. From Eq. (2.1), we get: (electrodes). Work done by external force in bringing a unit positive charge from point R to P  U P − U R  = VP – VR = (2.4)  q  where VP and VR are the electrostatic potentials at P and R, respectively. Note, as before, that it is not the actual value of potential but the potential difference that is physically significant. If, as before, we choose the potential to be zero at infinity, Eq. (2.4) implies: Work done by an external force in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to a point = electrostatic potential (V ) at that point. 47 Reprint 2025-26 Physics In other words, the electrostatic potential (V ) at any point in a region with electrostatic field is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge (without acceleration) from infinity to that point. The qualifying remarks made earlier regarding potential energy also apply to the definition of potential. To obtain the work done per unit test charge, we should take an infinitesimal test charge FIGURE 2.2 Work done on a test charge q dq, obtain the work done dW in bringing it from by the electrostatic field due to any given infinity to the point and determine the ratio charge configuration is independent dW/dq. Also, the external force at every point of the of the path, and depends only on path is to be equal and opposite to the electrostatic its initial and final positions. force on the test charge at that point. 2.3 POTENTIAL DUE TO A POINT CHARGE Consider a point charge Q at the origin (Fig. 2.3). For definiteness, take Q to be positive. We wish to determine the potential at any point P with position vector r from the origin. For that we must calculate the work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the point P. For Q > 0, the work done against the repulsive force on the test charge is positive. Since work done is independent of the path, we choose a convenient path – along the radial direction from infinity to the point P. At some intermediate point P¢ on the path, the electrostatic force on a unit positive charge is FIGURE 2.3 Work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the Q × 1 rˆ ′ (2.5) point P, against the repulsive force of 2 4 πε0r ' charge Q (Q > 0), is the potential at P due to the charge Q. where ˆ′r is the unit vector along OP¢. Work done against this force from r¢ to r¢ + Dr¢ is Q ∆W = − 2 ∆′r (2.6) 4 πε0r ' The negative sign appears because for Dr¢ < 0, DW is positive. Total work done (W) by the external force is obtained by integrating Eq. (2.6) from r¢ = ¥ to r¢ = r, r Q Q r Q = dr ′ = ε 0r ′ 2 4 πε0r ′ ∞ 4 πε0r (2.7) W = − ∫4∞ π This, by definition is the potential at P due to the charge Q Q V (r ) = (2.8) 48 4 πε0r Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance Equation (2.8) is true for any sign of the charge Q, though we considered Q > 0 in its derivation. For Q < 0, V < 0, i.e., work done (by the external force) per unit positive test charge in bringing it from infinity to the point is negative. This is equivalent to saying that work done by the electrostatic force in bringing the unit positive charge form infinity to the point P is positive. [This is as it should be, since for Q < 0, the force on a unit positive test charge is attractive, so that the electrostatic force and the displacement (from infinity to P) are FIGURE 2.4 Variation of potential V with r [in units of in the same direction.] Finally, we (Q/4pe0) m-1] (blue curve) and field with r [in units of (Q/4pe0) m-2] (black curve) for a point charge Q.note that Eq. (2.8) is consistent with the choice that potential at infinity be zero. Figure (2.4) shows how the electrostatic potential ( 1/r) and the electrostatic field (1/r 2 ) varies with r. Example 2.1 (a) Calculate the potential at a point P due to a charge of 4 × 10–7C located 9 cm away. (b) Hence obtain the work done in bringing a charge of 2 × 10–9 C from infinity to the point P. Does the answer depend on the path along which the charge is brought? Solution (a) = 4 × 104 V (b) W = qV = 2 × 10–9C × 4 × 104V = 8 × 10–5 J No, work done will be path independent. Any arbitrary infinitesimal path can be resolved into two perpendicular displacements: One along EXAMPLE r and another perpendicular to r. The work done corresponding to the later will be zero. 2.1

2.5 POTENTIAL DUE TO A SYSTEM OF CHARGES Consider a system of charges q1, q2,…, qn with position vectors r1, r2,…, rn relative to some origin (Fig. 2.6). The potential V1 at P due to the charge q1 is 1 q1 V1 = 4 πε0 r1P where r1P is the distance between q1 and P. Similarly, the potential V2 at P due to q2 and V3 due to q3 are given by 1 q 2 1 q 3 V 2 = , V 3 = 4 πε0 r2P 4 πε0 r3P where r2P and r3P are the distances of P from charges q2 and q3, respectively; and so on for the potential due to other charges. By the FIGURE 2.6 Potential at a point due to a superposition principle, the potential V at P due system of charges is the sum of potentials to the total charge configuration is the algebraic due to individual charges. sum of the potentials due to the individual charges V = V1 + V2 + ... + Vn (2.17) 51 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1  q1 q 2 q n  = + + ...... + (2.18) 4 πε0  r1P r2 P rnP  If we have a continuous charge distribution characterised by a charge density r (r), we divide it, as before, into small volume elements each of size Dv and carrying a charge rDv. We then determine the potential due to each volume element and sum (strictly speaking , integrate) over all such contributions, and thus determine the potential due to the entire distribution. We have seen in Chapter 1 that for a uniformly charged spherical shell, the electric field outside the shell is as if the entire charge is concentrated at the centre. Thus, the potential outside the shell is given by 1 q V = (r ≥ R ) [2.19(a)] 4 πε0 r where q is the total charge on the shell and R its radius. The electric field inside the shell is zero. This implies (Section 2.6) that potential is constant inside the shell (as no work is done in moving a charge inside the shell), and, therefore, equals its value at the surface, which is 1 q V = [2.19(b)] 4 πε0 R Example 2.2 Two charges 3 × 10–8 C and –2 × 10–8 C are located 15 cm apart. At what point on the line joining the two charges is the electric potential zero? Take the potential at infinity to be zero. Solution Let us take the origin O at the location of the positive charge. The line joining the two charges is taken to be the x-axis; the negative charge is taken to be on the right side of the origin (Fig. 2.7). FIGURE 2.7 Let P be the required point on the x-axis where the potential is zero. If x is the x-coordinate of P, obviously x must be positive. (There is no possibility of potentials due to the two charges adding up to zero for x < 0.) If x lies between O and A, we have 1  3 × 10 – 8 2 × 10 –8  − x × 10 –2 4 πε0  (15 − x ) × 10 –2  = 0 where x is in cm. That is, 3 2 − = 0 2.2 x 15 − x which gives x = 9 cm. If x lies on the extended line OA, the required condition is 3 2 − = 0 EXAMPLE x x − 15 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance which gives x = 45 cm Thus, electric potential is zero at 9 cm and 45 cm away from the positive charge on the side of the negative charge. Note that the EXAMPLE formula for potential used in the calculation required choosing potential to be zero at infinity. 2.2 Example 2.3 Figures 2.8 (a) and (b) show the field lines of a positive and negative point charge respectively. Electric potential, equipotential-sufaces-12584/ FIGURE 2.8 equipotential (a) Give the signs of the potential difference VP – VQ; VB – VA. (b) Give the sign of the potential energy difference of a small negative charge between the points Q and P; A and B. surfaces: (c) Give the sign of the work done by the field in moving a small positive charge from Q to P. (d) Give the sign of the work done by the external agency in moving a small negative charge from B to A. (e) Does the kinetic energy of a small negative charge increase or decrease in going from B to A? Solution 1 (a) As V ∝ , VP > VQ. Thus, (VP – VQ) is positive. Also VB is less negative r than VA . Thus, VB > VA or (VB – VA) is positive. (b) A small negative charge will be attracted towards positive charge. The negative charge moves from higher potential energy to lower potential energy. Therefore the sign of potential energy difference of a small negative charge between Q and P is positive. Similarly, (P.E.)A > (P.E.)B and hence sign of potential energy differences is positive. http://video.mit.edu/watch/4-electrostatic-potential-elctric-energy-ev-conservative-field- (c) In moving a small positive charge from Q to P, work has to be done by an external agency against the electric field. Therefore, work done by the field is negative. (d) In moving a small negative charge from B to A work has to be done by the external agency. It is positive. EXAMPLE (e) Due to force of repulsion on the negative charge, velocity decreases and hence the kinetic energy decreases in going from B to A. 2.3 53 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 2.6 EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES An equipotential surface is a surface with a constant value of potential at all points on the surface. For a single charge q, the potential is given by Eq. (2.8): 1 q V = 4 πεo r This shows that V is a constant if r is constant. Thus, equipotential surfaces of a single point charge are concentric spherical surfaces centred at the charge. Now the electric field lines for a single charge q are radial lines starting from or ending at the charge, depending on whether q is positive or negative. Clearly, the electric field at every point is normal to the equipotential surface passing through that point. This is true in general: for any charge configuration, equipotential surface through a point is normal to the electric field at that point. The proof of this statement is simple. If the field were not normal to the equipotential surface, it would have non-zero component along the surface. To move a unit test charge against the direction of the component of the field, work would have to be done. But this is in contradiction to the definition of an equipotential FIGURE 2.9 For a surface: there is no potential difference between any two points on the single charge q surface and no work is required to move a test charge on the surface. (a) equipotential The electric field must, therefore, be normal to the equipotential surface surfaces are at every point. Equipotential surfaces offer an alternative visual picture spherical surfaces in addition to the picture of electric field lines around a charge centred at the configuration. charge, and (b) electric field lines are radial, starting from the charge if q > 0. FIGURE 2.10 Equipotential surfaces for a uniform electric field. For a uniform electric field E, say, along the x-axis, the equipotential surfaces are planes normal to the x-axis, i.e., planes parallel to the y-z plane (Fig. 2.10). Equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole and (b) two identical positive charges are shown in Fig. 2.11. FIGURE 2.11 Some equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole, 54 (b) two identical positive charges. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance 2.6.1 Relation between field and potential Consider two closely spaced equipotential surfaces A and B (Fig. 2.12) with potential values V and V + dV, where dV is the change in V in the direction of the electric field E. Let P be a point on the surface B. d l is the perpendicular distance of the surface A from P. Imagine that a unit positive charge is moved along this perpendicular from the surface B to surface A against the electric field. The work done in this process is |E|dl. This work equals the potential difference VA–VB. Thus, |E|d l = V – (V + dV)= – dV V i.e., |E|= −δ (2.20) δl Since dV is negative, dV = – |dV|. we can rewrite FIGURE 2.12 From the Eq (2.20) as potential to the field. δV δV E = − = + (2.21) δl δl We thus arrive at two important conclusions concerning the relation between electric field and potential: (i) Electric field is in the direction in which the potential decreases steepest. (ii) Its magnitude is given by the change in the magnitude of potential per unit displacement normal to the equipotential surface at the point.