2.7 POTENTIAL ENERGY OF A SYSTEM OF CHARGES Consider first the simple case of two charges q1and q2 with position vector r1 and r2 relative to some origin. Let us calculate the work done (externally) in building up this configuration. This means that we consider the charges q1 and q2 initially at infinity and determine the work done by an external agency to bring the charges to the given locations. Suppose, first the charge q1 is brought from infinity to the point r1. There is no external field against which work needs to be done, so work done in bringing q1 from infinity to r1 is zero. This charge produces a potential in space given by 1 q1 V1 = 4 πε0 r1P where r1P is the distance of a point P in space from the location of q1. From the definition of potential, work done in bringing charge q2 from infinity to the point r2 is q2 times the potential at r2 due to q1: 1 q1q 2 work done on q2 = 4 πε0 r12 55 Reprint 2025-26 Physics where r12 is the distance between points 1 and 2. Since electrostatic force is conservative, this work gets stored in the form of potential energy of the system. Thus, the potential energy of a system of two charges q1 and q2 is FIGURE 2.13 Potential energy of a 1 q1q 2 U = system of charges q1 and q2 is 4 πε0 r12 (2.22) directly proportional to the product of charges and inversely to the Obviously, if q2 was brought first to its present location and distance between them. q1 brought later, the potential energy U would be the same. More generally, the potential energy expression, Eq. (2.22), is unaltered whatever way the charges are brought to the specified locations, because of path-independence of work for electrostatic force. Equation (2.22) is true for any sign of q1and q2. If q1q2 > 0, potential energy is positive. This is as expected, since for like charges (q1q2 > 0), electrostatic force is repulsive and a positive amount of work is needed to be done against this force to bring the charges from infinity to a finite distance apart. For unlike charges (q1 q2 < 0), the electrostatic force is attractive. In that case, a positive amount of work is needed against this force to take the charges from the given location to infinity. In other words, a negative amount of work is needed for the reverse path (from infinity to the present locations), so the potential energy is negative. Equation (2.22) is easily generalised for a system of any number of point charges. Let us calculate the potential energy of a system of three charges q1, q2 and q3 located at r1, r2, r3, respectively. To bring q1 first from infinity to r1, no work is required. Next we bring q2 from infinity to r2. As before, work done in this step is 1 q1q 2 q 2 V1 ( r2 ) = (2.23) 4 πε0 r12 The charges q1 and q2 produce a potential, which at any point P is given by 1  q1 q 2  V1, 2 = + (2.24) 4 πε0  r1P r2 P  Work done next in bringing q3 from infinity to the point r3 is q3 times V1, 2 at r3 1  q1q 3 q 2 q 3  q 3 V1, 2 ( r3 ) = + (2.25) 4 πε0  r13 r23  The total work done in assembling the charges at the given locations is obtained by adding the work done in different steps [Eq. (2.23) and Eq. (2.25)], 1  q1q 2 q1q 3 q 2 q 3  U = + + (2.26) FIGURE 2.14 Potential energy of a 4 πε0  r12 r13 r23  system of three charges is given by Again, because of the conservative nature of the Eq. (2.26), with the notation given electrostatic force (or equivalently, the path in the figure. independence of work done), the final expression for U, Eq. (2.26), is independent of the manner in which 56 the configuration is assembled. The potential energy Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance is characteristic of the present state of configuration, and not the way the state is achieved. Example 2.4 Four charges are arranged at the corners of a square ABCD of side d, as shown in Fig. 2.15.(a) Find the work required to put together this arrangement. (b) A charge q0 is brought to the centre E of the square, the four charges being held fixed at its corners. How much extra work is needed to do this? FIGURE 2.15 Solution (a) Since the work done depends on the final arrangement of the charges, and not on how they are put together, we calculate work needed for one way of putting the charges at A, B, C and D. Suppose, first the charge +q is brought to A, and then the charges –q, +q, and –q are brought to B, C and D, respectively. The total work needed can be calculated in steps: (i) Work needed to bring charge +q to A when no charge is present elsewhere: this is zero. (ii) Work needed to bring –q to B when +q is at A. This is given by (charge at B) × (electrostatic potential at B due to charge +q at A)  q  q 2 = −q × − ε  4 πε0 d = 4 π 0 d (iii) Work needed to bring charge +q to C when +q is at A and –q is at B. This is given by (charge at C) × (potential at C due to charges at A and B)  + q −q  = + q + ε 0 d   4 πε0 d 2 4 π −q 2  1  = 4 πε0 d 1 − 2  (iv) Work needed to bring –q to D when +q at A,–q at B, and +q at C. This is given by (charge at D) × (potential at D due to charges at A, B and C)  + q −q q  = −q + + ε  4 π 0 d 4 πε0 d 2 4 πε0 d  EXAMPLE −q 2  1  = 4 πε0 d  2 − 2  2.4 57 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Add the work done in steps (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv). The total work required is −q 2   1   1   =  4 πε0 d ( 0 ) + (1) + 1 − 2 +  2 − 2    −q 2 = 4 − 2 ( ) 4 πε0 d The work done depends only on the arrangement of the charges, and not how they are assembled. By definition, this is the total electrostatic energy of the charges. (Students may try calculating same work/energy by taking charges in any other order they desire and convince themselves that the energy will remain the same.) 2.4 the(b) Thefourextrachargesworkarenecessaryat A, B, CtoandbringD ais chargeq0 × (electrostaticq0 to the pointpotentialE whenat E due to the charges at A, B, C and D). The electrostatic potential at E is clearly zero since potential due to A and C is cancelled by that due to B and D. Hence, no work is required to bring any charge to EXAMPLE point E. 2.8 POTENTIAL ENERGY IN AN EXTERNAL FIELD 2.8.1 Potential energy of a single charge In Section 2.7, the source of the electric field was specified – the charges and their locations - and the potential energy of the system of those charges was determined. In this section, we ask a related but a distinct question. What is the potential energy of a charge q in a given field? This question was, in fact, the starting point that led us to the notion of the electrostatic potential (Sections 2.1 and 2.2). But here we address this question again to clarify in what way it is different from the discussion in Section 2.7. The main difference is that we are now concerned with the potential energy of a charge (or charges) in an external field. The external field E is not produced by the given charge(s) whose potential energy we wish to calculate. E is produced by sources external to the given charge(s).The external sources may be known, but often they are unknown or unspecified; what is specified is the electric field E or the electrostatic potential V due to the external sources. We assume that the charge q does not significantly affect the sources producing the external field. This is true if q is very small, or the external sources are held fixed by other unspecified forces. Even if q is finite, its influence on the external sources may still be ignored in the situation when very strong sources far away at infinity produce a finite field E in the region of interest. Note again that we are interested in determining the potential energy of a given charge q (and later, a system of charges) in the external field; we are not interested in the potential energy of the sources producing the external electric field. The external electric field E and the corresponding external potential V may vary from point to point. By definition, V at a point P is the work 58 done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to the point P. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (We continue to take potential at infinity to be zero.) Thus, work done in bringing a charge q from infinity to the point P in the external field is qV. This work is stored in the form of potential energy of q. If the point P has position vector r relative to some origin, we can write: Potential energy of q at r in an external field = qV(r) (2.27) where V(r) is the external potential at the point r. Thus, if an electron with charge q = e = 1.6×10–19 C is accelerated by a potential difference of DV = 1 volt, it would gain energy of qDV = 1.6 × 10–19J. This unit of energy is defined as 1 electron volt or 1eV, i.e., 1 eV=1.6 × 10–19J. The units based on eV are most commonly used in atomic, nuclear and particle physics, (1 keV = 103eV = 1.6 × 10–16J, 1 MeV = 106eV = 1.6 × 10–13J, 1 GeV = 109eV = 1.6 × 10–10J and 1 TeV = 1012eV = 1.6 × 10–7J). [This has already been defined on Page 117, XI 2.8.2 Potential energy of a system of two charges in an external field Next, we ask: what is the potential energy of a system of two charges q1 and q2 located at r1and r2, respectively, in an external field? First, we calculate the work done in bringing the charge q1 from infinity to r1. Work done in this step is q1 V(r1), using Eq. (2.27). Next, we consider the work done in bringing q2 to r2. In this step, work is done not only against the external field E but also against the field due to q1. Work done on q2 against the external field = q2 V (r2) Work done on q2 against the field due to q1 q1q 2 = 4 πεo r12 where r12 is the distance between q1 and q2. We have made use of Eqs. (2.27) and (2.22). By the superposition principle for fields, we add up the work done on q2 against the two fields (E and that due to q1): Work done in bringing q2 to r2 q1q 2 = q 2 V ( r2 ) + (2.28) 4 πεo r12 Thus, Potential energy of the system = the total work done in assembling the configuration q1q 2 = q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) + (2.29) 4 πε0r12 Example 2.5 (a) Determine the electrostatic potential energy of a system consisting of two charges 7 mC and –2 mC (and with no external field) placed at (–9 cm, 0, 0) and (9 cm, 0, 0) respectively. EXAMPLE (b) How much work is required to separate the two charges infinitely 2.5 away from each other? 59 Reprint 2025-26 Physics (c) Suppose that the same system of charges is now placed in an external electric field E = A (1/r 2); A = 9 × 105 NC–1 m2. What would the electrostatic energy of the configuration be? Solution 1 q1q 2 9 7 × ( −2) × 10 −12 (a) U = = 9 × 10 × = –0.7 J. 4 πε0 r 0.18 (b) W = U2 – U1 = 0 – U = 0 – (–0.7) = 0.7 J. (c) The mutual interaction energy of the two charges remains unchanged. In addition, there is the energy of interaction of the two charges with the external electric field. We find, 7 µ C −µ2 C q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) = A + A 0.09m 0.09m 2.5 and the net electrostatic energy is q1q 2 7 µC −µ2 C q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) + = A + A − 0.7 J 4 πε0r12 0.09 m 0.09 m EXAMPLE = 70 − 20 − 0.7 = 49.3 J 2.8.3 Potential energy of a dipole in an external field Consider a dipole with charges q1 = +q and q2 = –q placed in a uniform electric field E, as shown in Fig. 2.16. As seen in the last chapter, in a uniform electric field, the dipole experiences no net force; but experiences a torque ttttt given by ttttt ===== p × E (2.30) which will tend to rotate it (unless p is parallel or antiparallel to E). Suppose an external torque text is applied in such a manner that it just neutralises this torque and rotates it in the plane of paper from angle q0 to angle q1 at an infinitesimal angular speed and without angular acceleration. The amount of work done by the external torque will be given by FIGURE 2.16 Potential energy of a dipole in a uniform external field. = pE ( cosθ0 − cosθ1 ) (2.31) This work is stored as the potential energy of the system. We can then associate potential energy U(q) with an inclination q of the dipole. Similar to other potential energies, there is a freedom in choosing the angle where the potential energy U is taken to be zero. A natural choice is to take q0 = p / 2. (An explanation for it is provided towards the end of discussion.) We can then write, (2.32) 60 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance This expression can alternately be understood also from Eq. (2.29). We apply Eq. (2.29) to the present system of two charges +q and –q. The potential energy expression then reads q 2 U ′ (θ) = q [V ( r1 ) − V ( r2 )] − (2.33) 4 πε0 × 2a Here, r1 and r2 denote the position vectors of +q and –q. Now, the potential difference between positions r1 and r2 equals the work done in bringing a unit positive charge against field from r2 to r1. The displacement parallel to the force is 2a cosq. Thus, [V(r1)–V (r2)] = –E × 2a cosq . We thus obtain, q 2 q 2 U ′ (θ) = − pE cosθ− = − p.E − (2.34) 4 πε0 × 2a 4 πε0 × 2a We note that U¢(q) differs from U(q ) by a quantity which is just a constant for a given dipole. Since a constant is insignificant for potential energy, we can drop the second term in Eq. (2.34) and it then reduces to Eq. (2.32). We can now understand why we took q0=p/2. In this case, the work done against the external field E in bringing +q and – q are equal and opposite and cancel out, i.e., q [V (r1) – V (r2)]=0. Example 2.6 A molecule of a substance has a permanent electric dipole moment of magnitude 10–29 C m. A mole of this substance is polarised (at low temperature) by applying a strong electrostatic field of magnitude 106 V m–1. The direction of the field is suddenly changed by an angle of 60º. Estimate the heat released by the substance in aligning its dipoles along the new direction of the field. For simplicity, assume 100% polarisation of the sample. Solution Here, dipole moment of each molecules = 10–29 C m As 1 mole of the substance contains 6 × 1023 molecules, total dipole moment of all the molecules, p = 6 × 1023 × 10–29 C m = 6 × 10–6 C m Initial potential energy, Ui = –pE cos q = –6×10–6×106 cos 0° = –6 J Final potential energy (when q = 60°), Uf = –6 × 10–6 × 106 cos 60° = –3 J Change in potential energy = –3 J – (–6J) = 3 J EXAMPLE So, there is loss in potential energy. This must be the energy released by the substance in the form of heat in aligning its dipoles. 2.6

7.5 ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY OF THE EARTH 4π 3 density and hence its mass is M E = R E ρ 3 The earth can be imagined to be a sphere made where ME is the mass of the earth RE is its radiusof a large number of concentric spherical shells and ρ is the density. On the other hand thewith the smallest one at the centre and the largest one at its surface. A point outside the 4π 3 ρr and mass of the sphere Mr of radius r isearth is obviously outside all the shells. Thus, 3 Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 133 hence its distance from the centre of the earth is (RE + h ). If F (h) denoted the magnitude of the force on the point mass m , we get from G m M E Eq. (7.5) : = 3 r (7.10) R E If the mass m is situated on the surface of GM E m F (h ) = earth, then r = RE and the gravitational force on ( R E + h )2 (7.13) it is, from Eq. (7.10) The acceleration experienced by the point M E m F = G 2 (7.11) mass is F (h )/ m ≡ g (h ) and we get R E The acceleration experienced by the mass F (h ) GM E . g (h ) = = (7.14)m, which is usually denoted by the symbol g is m ( R E + h )2 related to F by Newton’s 2nd law by relation This is clearly less than the value of g on the F = mg. Thus GM E . g = surface of earth : GM F For h << R E , we can E R E2 g = = 2 (7.12) m R E expand the RHS of Eq. (7.14) : E Acceleration g is readily measurable. RE is a g (h ) = 2 GM 2 = g (1 + h / R E )−2known quantity. The measurement of G by R E (1 + h / R E ) Cavendish’s experiment (or otherwise), combined h << 1 , using binomial expression,with knowledge of g and RE enables one to For R E estimate ME from Eq. (7.12). This is the reason  2h why there is a popular statement regarding g (h ) ≅ g 1 − . (7.15)Cavendish : “Cavendish weighed the earth”.  RE  7.6 ACCELERATION DUE TO GRAVITY BELOW Equation (7.15) thus tells us that for small AND ABOVE THE SURFACE OF EARTH heights h above the value of g decreases by a factor (1 − 2h / R E ).Consider a point mass m at a height h above the Now, consider a point mass m at a depthsurface of the earth as shown in Fig. 7.8(a). The d below the surface of the earth (Fig. 7.8(b)),radius of the earth is denoted by RE . Since this so that its distance from the centre of thepoint is outside the earth, earth is ( R E − d ) as shown in the figure. The earth can be thought of as being composed of a smaller sphere of radius (RE – d ) and a spherical shell of thickness d. The force on m due to the outer shell of thickness d is zero because the result quoted in the previous section. As far as the smaller sphere of radius ( RE – d ) is concerned, the point mass is outside it and hence according to the result quoted earlier, the force due to this smaller sphere is just as if the entire mass of the smaller sphere is concentrated at the centre. If Ms is the mass of the smaller sphere, then, Ms/ME = ( RE – d)3 / RE3 ( 7.16) Since mass of a sphere is proportional to be Fig. 7.8 (a) g at a height h above the surface of the cube of its radius. earth. Reprint 2025-26 134 PHYSICS close to the surface of earth, at distances from the surface much smaller than the radius of the earth. In such cases, the force of gravity is practically a constant equal to mg, directed towards the centre of the earth. If we consider a Ms ME point at a height h1 from the surface of the earth and another point vertically above it at a height h2 from the surface, the work done in lifting the particle of mass m from the first to the second position is denoted by W12 Fig. 7.8 (b) g at a depth d. In this case only the smaller W12 = Force × displacement = mg (h2 – h1) (7.20) sphere of radius (RE–d) contributes to g. Thus the force on the point mass is If we associate a potential energy W(h) at a point at a height h above the surface such that F (d) = G Ms m / (RE – d ) 2 (7.17) W(h) = mgh + Wo (7.21) Substituting for Ms from above , we get (where Wo = constant) ; F (d) = G ME m ( RE – d ) / RE 3 (7.18) then it is clear that and hence the acceleration due to gravity at W12 = W(h2) – W(h1) (7.22) a depth d, The work done in moving the particle is just the difference of potential energy between its F ( d ) final and initial positions.Observe that the g(d) = is m constant Wo cancels out in Eq. (7.22). Setting h = 0 in the last equation, we get W ( h = 0 ) = Wo. F (d ) GM E g ( d ) = = 3 ( R E − d ) . h = 0 means points on the surface of the earth. m R E Thus, Wo is the potential energy on the surface of the earth. R E − d = g = g (1 − d / R E ) (7.19) If we consider points at arbitrary distance R E from the surface of the earth, the result just Thus, as we go down below earth’s surface, derived is not valid since the assumption that the acceleration due gravity decreases by a factor the gravitational force mg is a constant is no (1 − d / R E ). The remarkable thing about longer valid. However, from our discussion we know that a point outside the earth, the force of acceleration due to earth’s gravity is that it is gravitation on a particle directed towards the maximum on its surface decreasing whether you centre of the earth is go up or down. G ME m F = 2 (7.23)7.7 GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL ENERGY r where ME = mass of earth, m = mass of theWe had discussed earlier the notion of potential particle and r its distance from the centre of theenergy as being the energy stored in the body at earth. If we now calculate the work done inits given position. If the position of the particle lifting a particle from r = r1 to r = r2 (r2 > r1) alongchanges on account of forces acting on it, then a vertical path, we get instead of Eq. (7.20) the change in its potential energy is just the amount of work done on the body by the force. r2 G M m W12 2 d rAs we had discussed earlier, forces for which the =∫r1 r work done is independent of the path are the conservative forces.  1 1  = − G M E m − (7.24) The force of gravity is a conservative force  r2 r1  and we can calculate the potential energy of a In place of Eq. (7.21), we can thus associate body arising out of this force, called the a potential energy W(r) at a distance r, such that gravitational potential energy. Consider points Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 135 G M E m W (r ) =− + W1 , (7.25) r valid for r > R , so that once again W12 = W(r2) – W(r1). Setting r = infinity in the last equation, we get W ( r = infinity ) = W1 . Thus, W1 is the potential energy at infinity. One should note that only the difference of potential energy between two points has a definite meaning from Eqs. (7.22) and (7.24). One conventionally sets W1 equal to zero, so that the potential energy at a point is just the amount of work done in displacing the particle from infinity to that point. We have calculated the potential energy at a point of a particle due to gravitational forces Fig. 7.9 on it due to the earth and it is proportional to the mass of the particle. The gravitational The gravitational potential at the centre of potential due to the gravitational force of the the square r = 2 l/2 is ( )earth is defined as the potential energy of a particle of unit mass at that point. From the G m U (r ) = − 4 2 . ⊳earlier discussion, we learn that the gravitational l potential energy associated with two particles of masses m1 and m2 separated by distance by a 7.8 ESCAPE SPEED distance r is given by If a stone is thrown by hand, we see it falls back Gm 1m 2 to the earth. Of course using machines we can V = – (if we choose V = 0 as r →∞) r shoot an object with much greater speeds and It should be noted that an isolated system of with greater and greater initial speed, the object particles will have the total potential energy that scales higher and higher heights. A natural equals the sum of energies (given by the above query that arises in our mind is the following: equation) for all possible pairs of its constituent ‘can we throw an object with such high initial particles. This is an example of the application speeds that it does not fall back to the earth?’ of the superposition principle. The principle of conservation of energy helps us to answer this question. Suppose the object ⊳ Example 7.3 Find the potential energy of did reach infinity and that its speed there was a system of four particles placed at the Vf. The energy of an object is the sum of potential vertices of a square of side l. Also obtain and kinetic energy. As before W1 denotes that the potential at the centre of the square. gravitational potential energy of the object at infinity. The total energy of the projectile at infinity then is Answer Consider four masses each of mass m at the corners of a square of side l; See Fig. 7.9. 2 mV fWe have four mass pairs at distance l and two E ( ∞=) W1 + (7.26) 2 diagonal pairs at distance 2 l If the object was thrown initially with a speed Hence, Vi from a point at a distance (h+RE) from the G m 2 G m 2 centre of the earth (RE = radius of the earth), its W (r ) = − 4 − 2 l 2 l energy initially was 2 2 1 2 GmM E 2 G m  1  G m E (h + R E ) = mVi – + W1 (7.27) 5.41 = − 2 (h + R E ) 2 +  = − l  l  2  Reprint 2025-26 136 PHYSICS By the principle of energy conservation ⊳ Eqs. (7.26) and (7.27) must be equal. Hence Example 7.4 Two uniform solid spheres 2 2 of equal radii R, but mass M and 4 M have mV f mVi GmM E a centre to centre separation 6 R, as shown – = (7.28) 2 (h + R E ) 2 in Fig. 7.10. The two spheres are held fixed. The R.H.S. is a positive quantity with a A projectile of mass m is projected from the minimum value zero hence so must be the L.H.S. surface of the sphere of mass M directly Thus, an object can reach infinity as long as Vi towards the centre of the second sphere. is such that Obtain an expression for the minimum speed v of the projectile so that it reaches mVi 2 GmM E the surface of the second sphere. – ≥ 0 (7.29) 2 (h + R E ) The minimum value of Vi corresponds to the case when the L.H.S. of Eq. (7.29) equals zero. Thus, the minimum speed required for an object to reach infinity (i.e. escape from the earth) Fig. 7.10corresponds to 1 2 GmM E Answer The projectile is acted upon by two m = (7.30) mutually opposing gravitational forces of the two ( Vi )min 2 h + R E spheres. The neutral point N (see Fig. 7.10) is defined as the position where the two forces If the object is thrown from the surface of cancel each other exactly. If ON = r, we have the earth, h = 0, and we get G M m 4 G M m = 2GM E r 2 (6 R −r )2 (Vi )min = (7.31) (6R – r)2 = 4r2 R E 6R – r = ±2r r = 2R or – 6R. 2 The neutral point r = – 6R does not concern Using the relation g = GM E / R E , we get us in this example. Thus ON = r = 2R. It is sufficient to project the particle with a speed (Vi )min = 2 gR E (7.32) which would enable it to reach N. Thereafter, the greater gravitational pull of 4M would suffice. The mechanical energy at the surface Using the value of g and RE, numerically of M is (Vi)min≈11.2 km/s. This is called the escape 1 2 G M m 4 G M mspeed, sometimes loosely called the escape E i = m v − − . velocity. 2 R 5 R Equation (7.32) applies equally well to an At the neutral point N, the speed approaches object thrown from the surface of the moon with zero. The mechanical energy at N is purely g replaced by the acceleration due to Moon’s potential. gravity on its surface and rE replaced by the G M m 4 G M m − EN = − .radius of the moon. Both are smaller than their 2 R 4 R values on earth and the escape speed for the From the principle of conservation of moon turns out to be 2.3 km/s, about five times mechanical energy smaller. This is the reason that moon has no atmosphere. Gas molecules if formed on the 1 2 GM 4GM GM GMsurface of the moon having velocities larger than v − − = − − this will escape the gravitational pull of the 2 R 5 R 2R R moon. or Reprint 2025-26 GRAVITATION 137 + h) with speed V. Its 2 2 G M  4 1  traverses a distance 2π(RE v = − time period T therefore is R  5 2  2π( R E + h ) 2π( R E + h )3 / 2 T = = (7.37)  3 G M 1/2 V ⊳ G M E v =  5 R  on substitution of value of V from Eq. (7.35). A point to note is that the speed of the projectile Squaring both sides of Eq. (7.37), we get is zero at N, but is nonzero when it strikes the 2 T = k ( RE + h)3 (where k = 4 π2 / GME) (7.38)heavier sphere 4 M. The calculation of this speed is left as an exercise to the students. which is Kepler’s law of periods, as applied to motion of satellites around the earth. For a 7.9 EARTH SATELLITES satellite very close to the surface of earth h can be neglected in comparison to RE in Eq. (7.38). Earth satellites are objects which revolve around Hence, for such satellites, T is To, where the earth. Their motion is very similar to the motion of planets around the Sun and hence T 0 = 2π R E / g (7.39) Kepler’s laws of planetary motion are equally If we substitute the numerical values applicable to them. In particular, their orbits g ≃ 9.8 m s-2 and RE = 6400 km., we get around the earth are circular or elliptic. Moon is the only natural satellite of the earth with a near 6.4 × 10 6 T 0 = 2π s circular orbit with a time period of approximately 9.8

2.5 POTENTIAL DUE TO A SYSTEM OF CHARGES Consider a system of charges q1, q2,…, qn with position vectors r1, r2,…, rn relative to some origin (Fig. 2.6). The potential V1 at P due to the charge q1 is 1 q1 V1 = 4 πε0 r1P where r1P is the distance between q1 and P. Similarly, the potential V2 at P due to q2 and V3 due to q3 are given by 1 q 2 1 q 3 V 2 = , V 3 = 4 πε0 r2P 4 πε0 r3P where r2P and r3P are the distances of P from charges q2 and q3, respectively; and so on for the potential due to other charges. By the FIGURE 2.6 Potential at a point due to a superposition principle, the potential V at P due system of charges is the sum of potentials to the total charge configuration is the algebraic due to individual charges. sum of the potentials due to the individual charges V = V1 + V2 + ... + Vn (2.17) 51 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1  q1 q 2 q n  = + + ...... + (2.18) 4 πε0  r1P r2 P rnP  If we have a continuous charge distribution characterised by a charge density r (r), we divide it, as before, into small volume elements each of size Dv and carrying a charge rDv. We then determine the potential due to each volume element and sum (strictly speaking , integrate) over all such contributions, and thus determine the potential due to the entire distribution. We have seen in Chapter 1 that for a uniformly charged spherical shell, the electric field outside the shell is as if the entire charge is concentrated at the centre. Thus, the potential outside the shell is given by 1 q V = (r ≥ R ) [2.19(a)] 4 πε0 r where q is the total charge on the shell and R its radius. The electric field inside the shell is zero. This implies (Section 2.6) that potential is constant inside the shell (as no work is done in moving a charge inside the shell), and, therefore, equals its value at the surface, which is 1 q V = [2.19(b)] 4 πε0 R Example 2.2 Two charges 3 × 10–8 C and –2 × 10–8 C are located 15 cm apart. At what point on the line joining the two charges is the electric potential zero? Take the potential at infinity to be zero. Solution Let us take the origin O at the location of the positive charge. The line joining the two charges is taken to be the x-axis; the negative charge is taken to be on the right side of the origin (Fig. 2.7). FIGURE 2.7 Let P be the required point on the x-axis where the potential is zero. If x is the x-coordinate of P, obviously x must be positive. (There is no possibility of potentials due to the two charges adding up to zero for x < 0.) If x lies between O and A, we have 1  3 × 10 – 8 2 × 10 –8  − x × 10 –2 4 πε0  (15 − x ) × 10 –2  = 0 where x is in cm. That is, 3 2 − = 0 2.2 x 15 − x which gives x = 9 cm. If x lies on the extended line OA, the required condition is 3 2 − = 0 EXAMPLE x x − 15 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance which gives x = 45 cm Thus, electric potential is zero at 9 cm and 45 cm away from the positive charge on the side of the negative charge. Note that the EXAMPLE formula for potential used in the calculation required choosing potential to be zero at infinity. 2.2 Example 2.3 Figures 2.8 (a) and (b) show the field lines of a positive and negative point charge respectively. Electric potential, equipotential-sufaces-12584/ FIGURE 2.8 equipotential (a) Give the signs of the potential difference VP – VQ; VB – VA. (b) Give the sign of the potential energy difference of a small negative charge between the points Q and P; A and B. surfaces: (c) Give the sign of the work done by the field in moving a small positive charge from Q to P. (d) Give the sign of the work done by the external agency in moving a small negative charge from B to A. (e) Does the kinetic energy of a small negative charge increase or decrease in going from B to A? Solution 1 (a) As V ∝ , VP > VQ. Thus, (VP – VQ) is positive. Also VB is less negative r than VA . Thus, VB > VA or (VB – VA) is positive. (b) A small negative charge will be attracted towards positive charge. The negative charge moves from higher potential energy to lower potential energy. Therefore the sign of potential energy difference of a small negative charge between Q and P is positive. Similarly, (P.E.)A > (P.E.)B and hence sign of potential energy differences is positive. http://video.mit.edu/watch/4-electrostatic-potential-elctric-energy-ev-conservative-field- (c) In moving a small positive charge from Q to P, work has to be done by an external agency against the electric field. Therefore, work done by the field is negative. (d) In moving a small negative charge from B to A work has to be done by the external agency. It is positive. EXAMPLE (e) Due to force of repulsion on the negative charge, velocity decreases and hence the kinetic energy decreases in going from B to A. 2.3 53 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 2.6 EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES An equipotential surface is a surface with a constant value of potential at all points on the surface. For a single charge q, the potential is given by Eq. (2.8): 1 q V = 4 πεo r This shows that V is a constant if r is constant. Thus, equipotential surfaces of a single point charge are concentric spherical surfaces centred at the charge. Now the electric field lines for a single charge q are radial lines starting from or ending at the charge, depending on whether q is positive or negative. Clearly, the electric field at every point is normal to the equipotential surface passing through that point. This is true in general: for any charge configuration, equipotential surface through a point is normal to the electric field at that point. The proof of this statement is simple. If the field were not normal to the equipotential surface, it would have non-zero component along the surface. To move a unit test charge against the direction of the component of the field, work would have to be done. But this is in contradiction to the definition of an equipotential FIGURE 2.9 For a surface: there is no potential difference between any two points on the single charge q surface and no work is required to move a test charge on the surface. (a) equipotential The electric field must, therefore, be normal to the equipotential surface surfaces are at every point. Equipotential surfaces offer an alternative visual picture spherical surfaces in addition to the picture of electric field lines around a charge centred at the configuration. charge, and (b) electric field lines are radial, starting from the charge if q > 0. FIGURE 2.10 Equipotential surfaces for a uniform electric field. For a uniform electric field E, say, along the x-axis, the equipotential surfaces are planes normal to the x-axis, i.e., planes parallel to the y-z plane (Fig. 2.10). Equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole and (b) two identical positive charges are shown in Fig. 2.11. FIGURE 2.11 Some equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole, 54 (b) two identical positive charges. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance 2.6.1 Relation between field and potential Consider two closely spaced equipotential surfaces A and B (Fig. 2.12) with potential values V and V + dV, where dV is the change in V in the direction of the electric field E. Let P be a point on the surface B. d l is the perpendicular distance of the surface A from P. Imagine that a unit positive charge is moved along this perpendicular from the surface B to surface A against the electric field. The work done in this process is |E|dl. This work equals the potential difference VA–VB. Thus, |E|d l = V – (V + dV)= – dV V i.e., |E|= −δ (2.20) δl Since dV is negative, dV = – |dV|. we can rewrite FIGURE 2.12 From the Eq (2.20) as potential to the field. δV δV E = − = + (2.21) δl δl We thus arrive at two important conclusions concerning the relation between electric field and potential: (i) Electric field is in the direction in which the potential decreases steepest. (ii) Its magnitude is given by the change in the magnitude of potential per unit displacement normal to the equipotential surface at the point.