4.13 (a) A circular coil of 30 turns and radius 8.0 cm carrying a current of 6.0 A is suspended vertically in a uniform horizontal magnetic field of magnitude 1.0 T. The field lines make an angle of 60° with the normal of the coil. Calculate the magnitude of the counter torque that must be applied to prevent the coil from turning. (b) Would your answer change, if the circular coil in (a) were replaced by a planar coil of some irregular shape that encloses the same area? (All other particulars are also unaltered.) 135 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Chapter Five MAGNETISM AND MATTER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Magnetic phenomena are universal in nature. Vast, distant galaxies, the tiny invisible atoms, humans and beasts all are permeated through and through with a host of magnetic fields from a variety of sources. The earth’s magnetism predates human evolution. The word magnet is derived from the name of an island in Greece called magnesia where magnetic ore deposits were found, as early as 600 BC. In the previous chapter we have learned that moving charges or electric currents produce magnetic fields. This discovery, which was made in the early part of the nineteenth century is credited to Oersted, Ampere, Biot and Savart, among others. In the present chapter, we take a look at magnetism as a subject in its own right. Some of the commonly known ideas regarding magnetism are: (i) The earth behaves as a magnet with the magnetic field pointing approximately from the geographic south to the north. (ii) When a bar magnet is freely suspended, it points in the north-south direction. The tip which points to the geographic north is called the north pole and the tip which points to the geographic south is called 136 the south pole of the magnet. Reprint 2025-26 Magnetism and Matter (iii) There is a repulsive force when north poles ( or south poles ) of two magnets are brought close together. Conversely, there is an attractive force between the north pole of one magnet and the south pole of the other. (iv) We cannot isolate the north, or south pole of a magnet. If a bar magnet is broken into two halves, we get two similar bar magnets with somewhat weaker properties. Unlike electric charges, isolated magnetic north and south poles known as magnetic monopoles do not exist. (v) It is possible to make magnets out of iron and its alloys. We begin with a description of a bar magnet and its behaviour in an external magnetic field. We describe Gauss’s law of magnetism. We next describe how materials can be classified on the basis of their magnetic properties. We describe para-, dia-, and ferromagnetism. 5.25.25.25.25.2 TTTHETTHEHEHEHE BBBARBBARARARAR MMMAGNETMMAGNETAGNETAGNETAGNET We begin our study by examining iron filings sprinkled on a sheet of glass placed over a short bar magnet. The arrangement of iron filings is shown in Fig. 5.1. The pattern of iron filings suggests that the magnet has two poles similar to the positive and negative charge of an electric dipole. As mentioned in the introductory section, one pole is designated the North pole and the other, the South pole. When suspended freely, these poles point approximately towards the geographic north and south poles, respectively. A similar pattern of iron filings is observed around a current carrying solenoid. FIGUREFIGUREFIGUREFIGUREFIGURE 5.15.15.15.15.1 The arrangement 5.2.15.2.15.2.15.2.15.2.1 TheTheTheTheThe magneticmagneticmagneticmagneticmagnetic fieldfieldfieldfieldfield lineslineslineslineslines of iron filings surrounding a bar magnet. The pattern mimics The pattern of iron filings permits us to plot magnetic field lines. The pattern the magnetic field lines*. This is shown both suggests that the bar magnet is for the bar-magnet and the current- a magnetic dipole. carrying solenoid in Fig. 5.2. For comparison refer to the Chapter 1, Figure 1.14(d). Electric field lines of an electric dipole are also displayed in Fig. 5.2(c). The magnetic field lines are a visual and intuitive realisation of the magnetic field. Their properties are: (i) The magnetic field lines of a magnet (or a solenoid) form continuous closed loops. This is unlike the electric dipole where these field lines begin from a positive charge and end on the negative charge or escape to infinity. * In some textbooks the magnetic field lines are called magnetic lines of force. This nomenclature is avoided since it can be confusing. Unlike electrostatics the field lines in magnetism do not indicate the direction of the force on a 137 (moving) charge. Reprint 2025-26 Physics FIGURE 5.2 The field lines of (a) a bar magnet, (b) a current-carrying finite solenoid and (c) electric dipole. At large distances, the field lines are very similar. The curves labelled i and ii are closed Gaussian surfaces. (ii) The tangent to the field line at a given point represents the direction of the net magnetic field B at that point. (iii) The larger the number of field lines crossing per unit area, the stronger is the magnitude of the magnetic field B. In Fig. 5.2(a), B is larger around region ii than in region i . (iv) The magnetic field lines do not intersect, for if they did, the direction of the magnetic field would not be unique at the point of intersection. One can plot the magnetic field lines in a variety of ways. One way is to place a small magnetic compass needle at various positions and note its orientation. This gives us an idea of the magnetic field direction at various points in space. 5.2.2 Bar magnet as an FIGURE 5.3 Calculation of (a) The axial field of a equivalent solenoid finite solenoid in order to demonstrate its In the previous chapter, we have similarity to that of a bar magnet. (b) A magnetic explained how a current loop acts as a needle in a uniform magnetic field B. The arrangement may be used to determine either B magnetic dipole (Section 4.9). We or the magnetic moment m of the needle. mentioned Ampere’s hypothesis that all magnetic phenomena can be explained in 138 terms of circulating currents. Reprint 2025-26 Magnetism and Matter The resemblance of magnetic field lines for a bar magnet and a solenoid suggest that a bar magnet may be thought of as a large number of circulating currents in analogy with a solenoid. Cutting a bar magnet in half is like cutting a solenoid. We get two smaller solenoids with weaker magnetic properties. The field lines remain continuous, emerging from one face of the solenoid and entering into the other face. One can test this analogy by moving a small compass needle in the neighbourhood of a bar magnet and a current-carrying finite solenoid and noting that the deflections of the needle are similar in both cases. To make this analogy more firm we may calculate the axial field of a finite solenoid depicted in Fig. 5.3 (a). We can demonstrate that at large distances this axial field resembles that of a bar magnet. The magnitude of the field at point P due to the solenoid is µ0 2 m B = 3 (5.1) 4π r This is also the far axial magnetic field of a bar magnet which one may obtain experimentally. Thus, a bar magnet and a solenoid produce similar magnetic fields. The magnetic moment of a bar magnet is thus equal to the magnetic moment of an equivalent solenoid that produces the same magnetic field. 5.2.3 The dipole in a uniform magnetic field Let’s place a small compass needle of known magnetic moment m allowing it to oscillate in the magnetic field. This arrangement is shown in Fig. 5.3(b). The torque on the needle is [see Eq. (4.23)], τ = m × B (5.2) In magnitude τ = mB sinθ Here τ is restoring torque and θ is the angle between m and B. An expression for magnetic potential energy can be obtained on lines similar to electrostatic potential energy. The magnetic potential energy Um is given by (θ)d θ U m = ∫τ sin θ d θ = −mB cos θ = ∫mB = –m.B (5.3) We have emphasised in Chapter 2 that the zero of potential energy can be fixed at one’s convenience. Taking the constant of integration to be zero means fixing the zero of potential energy at θ = 90°, i.e., when the needle is perpendicular to the field. Equation (5.3) shows that potential energy is minimum (= –mB) at θ = 0° (most stable position) and maximum (= +mB) at θ = 180° (most unstable position). Example 5.1 (a) What happens if a bar magnet is cut into two pieces: (i) transverse to its length, (ii) along its length? (b) A magnetised needle in a uniform magnetic field experiences a EXAMPLE torque but no net force. An iron nail near a bar magnet, however, experiences a force of attraction in addition to a torque. Why? 5.1 139 Reprint 2025-26 Physics (c) Must every magnetic configuration have a north pole and a south pole? What about the field due to a toroid? (d) Two identical looking iron bars A and B are given, one of which is definitely known to be magnetised. (We do not know which one.) How would one ascertain whether or not both are magnetised? If only one is magnetised, how does one ascertain which one? [Use nothing else but the bars A and B.] Solution (a) In either case, one gets two magnets, each with a north and south pole. (b) No force if the field is uniform. The iron nail experiences a non- uniform field due to the bar magnet. There is induced magnetic moment in the nail, therefore, it experiences both force and torque. The net force is attractive because the induced south pole (say) in the nail is closer to the north pole of magnet than induced north pole. (c) Not necessarily. True only if the source of the field has a net non-zero magnetic moment. This is not so for a toroid or even for a straight infinite conductor. (d) Try to bring different ends of the bars closer. A repulsive force in some situation establishes that both are magnetised. If it is always attractive, then one of them is not magnetised. In a bar magnet the intensity of the magnetic field is the strongest at the two ends (poles) and weakest at the central region. This fact may be used to determine whether A or B is the magnet. In this case, to see which one of the two bars is a magnet, pick up one, (say, A) and lower one of its ends; first on one of the ends of the 5.1 other (say, B), and then on the middle of B. If you notice that in the middle of B, A experiences no force, then B is magnetised. If you do not notice any change from the end to the middle of B, EXAMPLE then A is magnetised. 5.2.4 The electrostatic analog Comparison of Eqs. (5.1), (5.2) and (5.3) with the corresponding equations for electric dipole (Chapter 1), suggests that magnetic field at large distances due to a bar magnet of magnetic moment m can be obtained from the equation for electric field due to an electric dipole of dipole moment p, by making the following replacements: 1 µ0 E → B , p → m , → 4 πε0 4 π In particular, we can write down the equatorial field (BE) of a bar magnet at a distance r, for r >> l, where l is the size of the magnet: µ0 m B E = − 4 π r 3 (5.4) Likewise, the axial field (BA) of a bar magnet for r >> l is: µ0 2 m B A =140 4 π r 3 (5.5) Reprint 2025-26 Magnetism and Matter Equation (5.5) is just Eq. (5.1) in the vector form. Table 5.1 summarises the analogy between electric and magnetic dipoles. TABLE 5.1 THE DIPOLE ANALOGY Electrostatics Magnetism 1/ε0 µ0 Dipole moment p m Equatorial Field for a short dipole –p/4πε0r 3 – µ0 m / 4π r 3 Axial Field for a short dipole 2p/4πε0r 3 µ0 2m / 4π r 3 External Field: torque p × E m × B External Field: Energy –p.E –m.B Example 5.2 Figure 5.4 shows a small magnetised needle P placed at a point O. The arrow shows the direction of its magnetic moment. The other arrows show different positions (and orientations of the magnetic moment) of another identical magnetised needle Q. (a) In which configuration the system is not in equilibrium? (b) In which configuration is the system in (i) stable, and (ii) unstable equilibrium? (c) Which configuration corresponds to the lowest potential energy among all the configurations shown? FIGURE 5.4 Solution Potential energy of the configuration arises due to the potential energy of one dipole (say, Q) in the magnetic field due to other (P). Use the result that the field due to P is given by the expression [Eqs. (5.4) and (5.5)]: µ0 m P B P = − 3 (on the normal bisector) 4π r µ0 2 m P B P = 3 (on the axis) 4π r where mP is the magnetic moment of the dipole P. EXAMPLE Equilibrium is stable when mQ is parallel to BP, and unstable when it is anti-parallel to BP. 5.2 141 Reprint 2025-26 Physics For instance for the configuration Q3 for which Q is along the perpendicular bisector of the dipole P, the magnetic moment of Q is parallel to the magnetic field at the position 3. Hence Q3 is stable. 5.2 Thus, (a) PQ1 and PQ2 (b) (i) PQ3, PQ6 (stable); (ii) PQ5, PQ4 (unstable) EXAMPLE (c) PQ6 5.3 MAGNETISM AND GAUSS’S LAW In Chapter 1, we studied Gauss’s law for electrostatics. In Fig 5.2(c), we see that for a closed surface represented by i , the number of lines leaving the surface is equal to the number of lines entering it. This is consistent with the fact that no net charge is enclosed by the surface. However, in the same figure, for the closed surface ii , there is a net outward flux, since it does include a net (positive) charge.1855) The situation is radically different for magnetic fields – which are continuous and form closed loops. Examine the Gaussian surfaces represented by i or ii in Fig 5.2(a) or Karl Friedrich Gauss Fig. 5.2(b). Both cases visually demonstrate that the(1777 (1777 – 1855) He was a number of magnetic field lines leaving the surface is child prodigy and was gifted balanced by the number of lines entering it. The net in mathematics, physics, magnetic flux is zero for both the surfaces. This is true engineering, astronomy for any closed surface.GAUSS and even land surveying. The properties of numbers fascinated him, and in his work he anticipated major mathematical development of later times. Along with Wilhelm Welser, he built theFRIEDRICH first electric telegraph in 1833. His mathematical theory of curved surface laid the foundation for theKARL later work of Riemann. FIGURE 5.5 Consider a small vector area element ∆S of a closed surface S as in Fig. 5.5. The magnetic flux through ÄS is defined as ∆φB = B.∆S, where B is the field at ∆S. We divide S into many small area elements and calculate the individual flux through each. Then, the net flux φB is, B.∆S = 0 (5.6) φB = ∑ ∆ φB = ∑ ’ all ’ ’ all ’ where ‘all’ stands for ‘all area elements ∆S′. Compare this with the Gauss’s law of electrostatics. The flux through a closed surface in that case is given by E.∆S =142 ∑ q ε0 Reprint 2025-26 Magnetism and Matter where q is the electric charge enclosed by the surface. The difference between the Gauss’s law of magnetism and that for electrostatics is a reflection of the fact that isolated magnetic poles (also called monopoles) are not known to exist. There are no sources or sinks of B; the simplest magnetic element is a dipole or a current loop. All magnetic phenomena can be explained in terms of an arrangement of dipoles and/or current loops. Thus, Gauss’s law for magnetism is: The net magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero. Example 5.3 Many of the diagrams given in Fig. 5.6 show magnetic field lines (thick lines in the figure) wrongly. Point out what is wrong with them. Some of them may describe electrostatic field lines correctly. Point out which ones. EXAMPLE FIGURE 5.6 5.3 143 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Solution (a) Wrong. Magnetic field lines can never emanate from a point, as shown in figure. Over any closed surface, the net flux of B must always be zero, i.e., pictorially as many field lines should seem to enter the surface as the number of lines leaving it. The field lines shown, in fact, represent electric field of a long positively charged wire. The correct magnetic field lines are circling the straight conductor, as described in Chapter 4. (b) Wrong. Magnetic field lines (like electric field lines) can never cross each other, because otherwise the direction of field at the point of intersection is ambiguous. There is further error in the figure. Magnetostatic field lines can never form closed loops around empty space. A closed loop of static magnetic field line must enclose a region across which a current is passing. By contrast, electrostatic field lines can never form closed loops, neither in empty space, nor when the loop encloses charges. (c) Right. Magnetic lines are completely confined within a toroid. Nothing wrong here in field lines forming closed loops, since each loop encloses a region across which a current passes. Note, for clarity of figure, only a few field lines within the toroid have been shown. Actually, the entire region enclosed by the windings contains magnetic field. (d) Wrong. Field lines due to a solenoid at its ends and outside cannot be so completely straight and confined; such a thing violates Ampere’s law. The lines should curve out at both ends, and meet eventually to form closed loops. (e) Right. These are field lines outside and inside a bar magnet. Note carefully the direction of field lines inside. Not all field lines emanate out of a north pole (or converge into a south pole). Around both the N-pole, and the S-pole, the net flux of the field is zero. (f ) Wrong. These field lines cannot possibly represent a magnetic field. Look at the upper region. All the field lines seem to emanate out of the shaded plate. The net flux through a surface surrounding the shaded plate is not zero. This is impossible for a magnetic field. The given field lines, in fact, show the electrostatic field lines around a positively charged upper plate and a negatively charged 5.3 carefullylower plate.grasped.The difference between Fig. [5.6(e) and (f)] should be (g) Wrong. Magnetic field lines between two pole pieces cannot be precisely straight at the ends. Some fringing of lines is inevitable. Otherwise, Ampere’s law is violated. This is also true for electric EXAMPLE field lines. Example 5.4 (a) Magnetic field lines show the direction (at every point) along which a small magnetised needle aligns (at the point). Do the magnetic field lines also represent the lines of force on a moving charged particle at every point? (b) If magnetic monopoles existed, how would the Gauss’s law of 5.4 magnetism be modified? (c) Does a bar magnet exert a torque on itself due to its own field? Does one element of a current-carrying wire exert a force on another EXAMPLE element of the same wire? Reprint 2025-26 Magnetism and Matter (d) Magnetic field arises due to charges in motion. Can a system have magnetic moments even though its net charge is zero? Solution (a) No. The magnetic force is always normal to B (remember magnetic force = qv × B). It is misleading to call magnetic field lines as lines of force. (b) Gauss’s law of magnetism states that the flux of B through any closed surface is always zero ∫s B .∆s = 0 . If monopoles existed, the right hand side would be equal to the monopole (magnetic charge) qm enclosed by S. [Analogous to Gauss’s law of electrostatics, B.∆s = µ0qm where qm is the ∫S (monopole) magnetic charge enclosed by S.] (c) No. There is no force or torque on an element due to the field produced by that element itself. But there is a force (or torque) on an element of the same wire. (For the special case of a straight wire, this force is zero.) (d) Yes. The average of the charge in the system may be zero. Yet, the mean of the magnetic moments due to various current loops may not be zero. We will come across such examples in connection EXAMPLE with paramagnetic material where atoms have net dipole moment 5.4 through their net charge is zero.

4.9 A square coil of side 10 cm consists of 20 turns and carries a current of 12 A. The coil is suspended vertically and the normal to the plane of the coil makes an angle of 30º with the direction of a uniform horizontal magnetic field of magnitude 0.80 T. What is the magnitude of torque experienced by the coil?

4.4 A horizontal overhead power line carries a current of 90 A in east to west direction. What is the magnitude and direction of the magnetic field due to the current 1.5 m below the line?