2.9 ELECTROSTATICS OF CONDUCTORS Conductors and insulators were described briefly in Chapter 1. Conductors contain mobile charge carriers. In metallic conductors, these charge carriers are electrons. In a metal, the outer (valence) electrons part away from their atoms and are free to move. These electrons are free within the metal but not free to leave the metal. The free electrons form a kind of ‘gas’; they collide with each other and with the ions, and move randomly in different directions. In an external electric field, they drift against the direction of the field. The positive ions made up of the nuclei and the bound electrons remain held in their fixed positions. In electrolytic 61conductors, the charge carriers are both positive and negative ions; but Reprint 2025-26 Physics the situation in this case is more involved – the movement of the charge carriers is affected both by the external electric field as also by the so-called chemical forces (see Chapter 3). We shall restrict our discussion to metallic solid conductors. Let us note important results regarding electrostatics of conductors. 1. Inside a conductor, electrostatic field is zero Consider a conductor, neutral or charged. There may also be an external electrostatic field. In the static situation, when there is no current inside or on the surface of the conductor, the electric field is zero everywhere inside the conductor. This fact can be taken as the defining property of a conductor. A conductor has free electrons. As long as electric field is not zero, the free charge carriers would experience force and drift. In the static situation, the free charges have so distributed themselves that the electric field is zero everywhere inside. Electrostatic field is zero inside a conductor. 2. At the surface of a charged conductor, electrostatic field must be normal to the surface at every point If E were not normal to the surface, it would have some non-zero component along the surface. Free charges on the surface of the conductor would then experience force and move. In the static situation, therefore, E should have no tangential component. Thus electrostatic field at the surface of a charged conductor must be normal to the surface at every point. (For a conductor without any surface charge density, field is zero even at the surface.) See result 5. 3. The interior of a conductor can have no excess charge in the static situation A neutral conductor has equal amounts of positive and negative charges in every small volume or surface element. When the conductor is charged, the excess charge can reside only on the surface in the static situation. This follows from the Gauss’s law. Consider any arbitrary volume element v inside a conductor. On the closed surface S bounding the volume element v, electrostatic field is zero. Thus the total electric flux through S is zero. Hence, by Gauss’s law, there is no net charge enclosed by S. But the surface S can be made as small as you like, i.e., the volume v can be made vanishingly small. This means there is no net charge at any point inside the conductor, and any excess charge must reside at the surface. 4. Electrostatic potential is constant throughout the volume of the conductor and has the same value (as inside) on its surface This follows from results 1 and 2 above. Since E = 0 inside the conductor and has no tangential component on the surface, no work is done in moving a small test charge within the conductor and on its surface. That is, there is no potential difference between any two points inside or on 62 the surface of the conductor. Hence, the result. If the conductor is charged, Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance electric field normal to the surface exists; this means potential will be different for the surface and a point just outside the surface. In a system of conductors of arbitrary size, shape and charge configuration, each conductor is characterised by a constant value of potential, but this constant may differ from one conductor to the other. 5. Electric field at the surface of a charged conductor σ E = nˆ (2.35) ε0 where s is the surface charge density and ˆn is a unit vector normal to the surface in the outward direction. To derive the result, choose a pill box (a short cylinder) as the Gaussian surface about any point P on the surface, as shown in Fig. 2.17. The pill box is partly inside and partly outside the surface of the conductor. It has a small area of cross section d S and negligible height. Just inside the surface, the electrostatic field is zero; just outside, the field is normal to the surface with magnitude E. Thus, the contribution to the total flux through the pill box comes only from the outside (circular) cross-section of the pill box. This equals ± EdS (positive for s > 0, negative for s < 0), since over the small area dS, E may be considered constant and E and dS are parallel or antiparallel. The charge enclosed by the pill box is sdS. By Gauss’s law σδS EdS = ε0 σ E = (2.36) ε0 Including the fact that electric field is normal to the FIGURE 2.17 The Gaussian surface surface, we get the vector relation, Eq. (2.35), which (a pill box) chosen to derive Eq. (2.35) is true for both signs of s. For s > 0, electric field is for electric field at the surface of a normal to the surface outward; for s < 0, electric field charged conductor. is normal to the surface inward. 6. Electrostatic shielding Consider a conductor with a cavity, with no charges inside the cavity. A remarkable result is that the electric field inside the cavity is zero, whatever be the size and shape of the cavity and whatever be the charge on the conductor and the external fields in which it might be placed. We have proved a simple case of this result already: the electric field inside a charged spherical shell is zero. The proof of the result for the shell makes use of the spherical symmetry of the shell (see Chapter 1). But the vanishing of electric field in the (charge-free) cavity of a conductor is, as mentioned above, a very general result. A related result is that even if the conductor 63 Reprint 2025-26 Physics is charged or charges are induced on a neutral conductor by an external field, all charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor with cavity. The proofs of the results noted in Fig. 2.18 are omitted here, but we note their important implication. Whatever be the charge and field configuration outside, any cavity in a conductor remains shielded from outside electric influence: the field inside the cavity is always zero. This is known as electrostatic shielding. The effect can be made use of in protecting sensitive instruments from FIGURE 2.18 The electric field inside a outside electrical influence. Figure 2.19 gives a cavity of any conductor is zero. All summary of the important electrostatic properties charges reside only on the outer surface of a conductor.of a conductor with cavity. (There are no charges placed in the cavity.) FIGURE 2.19 Some important electrostatic properties of a conductor. Example 2.7 (a) A comb run through one’s dry hair attracts small bits of paper. Why? What happens if the hair is wet or if it is a rainy day? (Remember, a paper does not conduct electricity.) (b) Ordinary rubber is an insulator. But special rubber tyres of aircraft are made slightly conducting. Why is this necessary? (c) Vehicles carrying inflammable materials usually have metallic ropes touching the ground during motion. Why? (d) A bird perches on a bare high power line, and nothing happens to the bird. A man standing on the ground touches the same line and gets a fatal shock. Why? Solution (a) This is because the comb gets charged by friction. The molecules 2.7 in the paper gets polarised by the charged comb, resulting in a net force of attraction. If the hair is wet, or if it is rainy day, friction between hair and the comb reduces. The comb does not get EXAMPLE charged and thus it will not attract small bits of paper. 64 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (b) To enable them to conduct charge (produced by friction) to the ground; as too much of static electricity accumulated may result in spark and result in fire. EXAMPLE (c) Reason similar to (b). (d) Current passes only when there is difference in potential. 2.7

2.4 A spherical conductor of radius 12 cm has a charge of 1.6 × 10–7C distributed uniformly on its surface. What is the electric field (a) inside the sphere (b) just outside the sphere (c) at a point 18 cm from the centre of the sphere?

2.4 POTENTIAL DUE TO AN ELECTRIC DIPOLE As we learnt in the last chapter, an electric dipole consists of two charges q and –q separated by a (small) distance 2a. Its total charge is zero. It is characterised by a dipole moment vector p whose magnitude is q × 2a and which points in the direction from –q to q (Fig. 2.5). We also saw that the electric field of a dipole at a point with position vector r depends not just on the magnitude r, but also on the angle between r and p. Further, 49 Reprint 2025-26 Physics the field falls off, at large distance, not as 1/r 2 (typical of field due to a single charge) but as 1/r3. We, now, determine the electric potential due to a dipole and contrast it with the potential due to a single charge. As before, we take the origin at the centre of the dipole. Now we know that the electric field obeys the superposition principle. Since potential is related to the work done by the field, electrostatic potential also follows the superposition principle. Thus, the potential due to the dipole is the sum of potentials due to the charges q and –q 1  q q  V = − (2.9)FIGURE 2.5 Quantities involved in the calculation 4 πε0  r1 r2  of potential due to a dipole. where r1 and r2 are the distances of the point P from q and –q, respectively. Now, by geometry, r12 = r 2 + a 2 − 2ar cosq r22 = r 2 + a 2 + 2ar cosq (2.10) We take r much greater than a ( r  a ) and retain terms only upto the first order in a/r 2 2  2a cosθ a 2  r1 = r 1 − + 2  r r  2  2a cosθ (2.11) ≅ r  1 − r  Similarly, 2 2  2a cosθ (2.12) r2 ≅ r 1 + r  Using the Binomial theorem and retaining terms upto the first order in a/r ; we obtain, 1 a 1  2a cos θ − 1 / 2 1   cos θ ≅ 1 − ≅ 1 + [2.13(a)] r1 r  r  r  r  1 a 1  2a cos θ − 1 / 2 1   cos θ ≅ 1 + ≅ 1 − [2.13(b)] r2 r  r  r  r  Using Eqs. (2.9) and (2.13) and p = 2qa, we get q 2 acosθ p cos θ V = = 4 πε0 r 2 4 πε0r 2 (2.14) 50 Now, p cos q = p.rˆ Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance where ˆr is the unit vector along the position vector OP. The electric potential of a dipole is then given by 1 p.rˆ V = 2 ; (r >> a) (2.15) 4 πε0 r Equation (2.15) is, as indicated, approximately true only for distances large compared to the size of the dipole, so that higher order terms in a/r are negligible. For a point dipole p at the origin, Eq. (2.15) is, however, exact. From Eq. (2.15), potential on the dipole axis (q = 0, p ) is given by 1 p V = ± 2 (2.16) 4 πε0 r (Positive sign for q = 0, negative sign for q = p.) The potential in the equatorial plane (q = p/2) is zero. The important contrasting features of electric potential of a dipole from that due to a single charge are clear from Eqs. (2.8) and (2.15): (i) The potential due to a dipole depends not just on r but also on the angle between the position vector r and the dipole moment vector p. (It is, however, axially symmetric about p. That is, if you rotate the position vector r about p, keeping q fixed, the points corresponding to P on the cone so generated will have the same potential as at P.) (ii) The electric dipole potential falls off, at large distance, as 1/r 2, not as 1/r, characteristic of the potential due to a single charge. (You can refer to the Fig. 2.5 for graphs of 1/r 2 versus r and 1/r versus r, drawn there in another context.)