4.6 AMPERE’S CIRCUITAL LAW There is an alternative and appealing way in which the Biot-Savart law may be expressed. Ampere’s circuital law considers an open surface with a boundary (Fig. 4.12). The surface has current passing through it. We consider the boundary to be made up of a number of small line elements. Consider one such element of length dl. We take the value of the tangential component of the FIGURE 4.12 117magnetic field, Bt, at this element and multiply it by the Reprint 2025-26 Physics length of that element dl [Note: Btdl=B.dl]. All such products are added together. We consider the limit as the lengths of elements get smaller and their number gets larger. The sum then tends to an integral. Ampere’s law states that this integral is equal to µ0 times the total current passing through the surface, i.e., “B.dl = µ0I [4.13(a)] where I is the total current through the surface. The integral is taken over the closed loop coinciding with the boundary C of the surface. The relation above involves a sign-convention, given by the right-hand rule. Let the fingers of the right-hand be curled in the sense the boundary is traversed in the loop integral “B.dl. Then the direction of the thumb gives the sense in which the Andre Ampere (1775 – current I is regarded as positive. 1836) Andre Marie Ampere For several applications, a much simplified version of was a French physicist, mathematician and chemist Eq. [4.13(a)] proves sufficient. We shall assume that, in who founded the science of such cases, it is possible to choose the loop (called electrodynamics. Ampere an amperian loop) such that at each point of the was a child prodigy loop, either who mastered advanced (i) B is tangential to the loop and is a non-zero constant mathematics by the age of B, or 12. Ampere grasped the significance of Oersted’s (ii) B is normal to the loop, or discovery. He carried out a (iii) B vanishes. large series of experiments Now, let L be the length (part) of the loop for which B to explore the relationship is tangential. Let Ie be the current enclosed by the loop. between current electricity Then, Eq. (4.13) reduces to, and magnetism. These investigations culminated BL =µ0Ie [4.13(b)] in 1827 with the When there is a system with a symmetry such as for publication of the a straight infinite current-carrying wire in Fig. 4.13, the ‘Mathematical Theory of Ampere’s law enables an easy evaluation of the magnetic–1836) Electrodynamic Pheno- mena Deduced Solely from field, much the same way Gauss’ law helps in Experiments’. He hypo- determination of the electric field. This is exhibited in the thesised that all magnetic Example 4.8 below. The boundary of the loop chosen is(1775 phenomena are due to a circle and magnetic field is tangential to the circulating electric circumference of the circle. The law gives, for the left hand currents. Ampere was side of Eq. [4.13 (b)], B. 2πr. We find that the magnetic humble and absent- field at a distance r outside the wire is tangential and minded. He once forgot anAMPERE given by invitation to dine with the Emperor Napoleon. He died B × 2πr = µ0 I, of pneumonia at the age of 61. His gravestone bears B = µ0 I/ (2πr) (4.14)ANDRE the epitaph: Tandem Felix The above result for the infinite wire is interesting (Happy at last). from several points of view. (i) It implies that the field at every point on a circle of radius r, (with the wire along the axis), is same in 118 magnitude. In other words, the magnetic field Reprint 2025-26 Moving Charges and Magnetism possesses what is called a cylindrical symmetry. The field that normally can depend on three coordinates depends only on one: r. Whenever there is symmetry, the solutions simplify. (ii) The field direction at any point on this circle is tangential to it. Thus, the lines of constant magnitude of magnetic field form concentric circles. Notice now, in Fig. 4.1(c), the iron filings form concentric circles. These lines called magnetic field lines form closed loops. This is unlike the electrostatic field lines which originate from positive charges and end at negative charges. The expression for the magnetic field of a straight wire provides a theoretical justification to Oersted’s experiments. (iii) Another interesting point to note is that even though the wire is infinite, the field due to it at a non-zero distance is not infinite. It tends to blow up only when we come very close to the wire. The field is directly proportional to the current and inversely proportional to the distance from the (infinitely long) current source. (iv) There exists a simple rule to determine the direction of the magnetic field due to a long wire. This rule, called the right-hand rule*, is: Grasp the wire in your right hand with your extended thumb pointing in the direction of the current. Your fingers will curl around in the direction of the magnetic field. Ampere’s circuital law is not new in content from Biot-Savart law. Both relate the magnetic field and the current, and both express the same physical consequences of a steady electrical current. Ampere’s law is to Biot-Savart law, what Gauss’s law is to Coulomb’s law. Both, Ampere’s and Gauss’s law relate a physical quantity on the periphery or boundary (magnetic or electric field) to another physical quantity, namely, the source, in the interior (current or charge). We also note that Ampere’s circuital law holds for steady currents which do not fluctuate with time. The following example will help us understand what is meant by the term enclosed current. Example 4.7 Figure 4.13 shows a long straight wire of a circular cross-section (radius a) carrying steady current I. The current I is uniformly distributed across this cross-section. Calculate the magnetic field in the region r < a and r > a. EXAMPLE 4.7 FIGURE 4.13 * Note that there are two distinct right-hand rules: One which gives the direction of B on the axis of current-loop and the other which gives direction of B for a straight conducting wire. Fingers and thumb play different roles in 119 the two. Reprint 2025-26 Physics Solution (a) Consider the case r > a. The Amperian loop, labelled 2, is a circle concentric with the cross-section. For this loop, L = 2 π r Ie = Current enclosed by the loop = I The result is the familiar expression for a long straight wire B (2π r) = µ0I µ0 I B = 2 π r [4.15(a)] 1 B ∝ (r > a) r Now the current enclosed Ie is not I, but is less than this value. Since the current distribution is uniform, the current enclosed is,  π r 2  Ir 2 I e = I 2 a 2  π  = a I r 2 B (2 π r ) = µ0 2 Using Ampere’s law, a  µ0 I  B = 2 r [4.15(b)]  2πa  B ∝ r (r < a) FIGURE 4.14 Figure (4.14) shows a plot of the magnitude of B with distance r 4.7 from the centre of the wire. The direction of the field is tangential to the respective circular loop (1 or 2) and given by the right-hand rule described earlier in this section. This example possesses the required symmetry so that Ampere’s EXAMPLE law can be applied readily. It should be noted that while Ampere’s circuital law holds for any loop, it may not always facilitate an evaluation of the magnetic field in every case. For example, for the case of the circular loop discussed in Section 4.5, it cannot be applied to extract the simple expression B = µ0I/2R [Eq. (4.12)] for the field at the centre of the loop. However, there exists a large number of situations of high symmetry where the law 120 can be conveniently applied. We shall use it in the next section to calculate Reprint 2025-26 Moving Charges and Magnetism the magnetic field produced by a commonly used and very useful magnetic system: the solenoid.

14.3 Carbon, silicon and germanium have four valence electrons each. These are characterised by valence and conduction bands separated 341 Reprint 2025-26 Physics by energy band gap respectively equal to (Eg)C, (Eg)Si and (Eg)Ge. Which of the following statements is true? (a) (Eg)Si < (Eg)Ge < (Eg)C (b) (Eg)C < (Eg)Ge > (Eg)Si (c) (Eg)C > (Eg)Si > (Eg)Ge (d) (Eg)C = (Eg)Si = (Eg)Ge 14.4 In an unbiased p-n junction, holes diffuse from the p-region to n-region because (a) free electrons in the n-region attract them. (b) they move across the junction by the potential difference. (c) hole concentration in p-region is more as compared to n-region. (d) All the above. 14.5 When a forward bias is applied to a p-n junction, it (a) raises the potential barrier. (b) reduces the majority carrier current to zero. (c) lowers the potential barrier. (d) None of the above. 14.6 In half-wave rectification, what is the output frequency if the input frequency is 50 Hz. What is the output frequency of a full-wave rectifier for the same input frequency. Reprint 2025-26 Notes Reprint 2025-26 Physics APPENDICES APPENDIX A 1 THE GREEK ALPHABET APPENDIX A 2 COMMON SI PREFIXES AND SYMBOLS FOR MULTIPLES AND SUB-MULTIPLES Reprint 2025-26 AppendicesAnswers APPENDIX A 3 SOME IMPORTANT CONSTANTS OTHER USEFUL CONSTANTS 345 Reprint 2025-26 Physics ANSWERS CHAPTER 9 9.1 v = –54 cm. The image is real, inverted and magnified. The size of the image is 5.0 cm. As u ® f, v ® ¥; for u < f, image is virtual. 9.2 v = 6.7 cm. Magnification = 5/9, i.e., the size of the image is 2.5 cm. As u ® ¥; v ® f (but never beyond) while m ® 0. 9.3 1.33; 1.7 cm 9.4 nga = 1.51; nwa = 1.32; ngw = 1.144; which gives sin r = 0.6181 i.e., r ~ 38°. 9.5 r = 0.8 × tan ic and sin ci = 1/1.33 ≅ 0.75 , where r is the radius (in m) of the largest circle from which light comes out and ic is the critical angle for water-air interface, Area = 2.6 m2 9.6 n ≅ 1.53 and Dm for prism in water ≅ 10° 9.7 R = 22 cm 9.8 Here the object is virtual and the image is real. u = +12 cm (object on right; virtual) (a) f = +20 cm. Image is real and at 7.5 cm from the lens on its right side. (b) f = –16 cm. Image is real and at 48 cm from the lens on its right side. 9.9 v = 8.4 cm, image is erect and virtual. It is diminished to a size 1.8 cm. As u ® ¥, v ® f (but never beyond f while m ® 0). Note that when the object is placed at the focus of the concave lens (21 cm), the image is located at 10.5 cm (not at infinity as one might wrongly think). 9.10 A diverging lens of focal length 60 cm 9.11 (a) ve = –25 cm and fe = 6.25 cm give ue = –5 cm; vO = (15 – 5) cm = 10 cm, fO = uO = – 2.5 cm; Magnifying power = 20 (b) uO = – 2.59 cm. Magnifying power = 13.5. 9.12 Angular magnification of the eye-piece for image at 25 cm 25 25   1  11; | u e |= cm = 2 .27cm ; vO = 7.2 cm 2.5 11 Separation = 9.47 cm; Magnifying power = 88 9.13 24; 150 cm 9.14 (a) Angular magnification = 1500 346 (b) Diameter of the image = 13.7 cm. Reprint 2025-26 Answers

2.5 POTENTIAL DUE TO A SYSTEM OF CHARGES Consider a system of charges q1, q2,…, qn with position vectors r1, r2,…, rn relative to some origin (Fig. 2.6). The potential V1 at P due to the charge q1 is 1 q1 V1 = 4 πε0 r1P where r1P is the distance between q1 and P. Similarly, the potential V2 at P due to q2 and V3 due to q3 are given by 1 q 2 1 q 3 V 2 = , V 3 = 4 πε0 r2P 4 πε0 r3P where r2P and r3P are the distances of P from charges q2 and q3, respectively; and so on for the potential due to other charges. By the FIGURE 2.6 Potential at a point due to a superposition principle, the potential V at P due system of charges is the sum of potentials to the total charge configuration is the algebraic due to individual charges. sum of the potentials due to the individual charges V = V1 + V2 + ... + Vn (2.17) 51 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1  q1 q 2 q n  = + + ...... + (2.18) 4 πε0  r1P r2 P rnP  If we have a continuous charge distribution characterised by a charge density r (r), we divide it, as before, into small volume elements each of size Dv and carrying a charge rDv. We then determine the potential due to each volume element and sum (strictly speaking , integrate) over all such contributions, and thus determine the potential due to the entire distribution. We have seen in Chapter 1 that for a uniformly charged spherical shell, the electric field outside the shell is as if the entire charge is concentrated at the centre. Thus, the potential outside the shell is given by 1 q V = (r ≥ R ) [2.19(a)] 4 πε0 r where q is the total charge on the shell and R its radius. The electric field inside the shell is zero. This implies (Section 2.6) that potential is constant inside the shell (as no work is done in moving a charge inside the shell), and, therefore, equals its value at the surface, which is 1 q V = [2.19(b)] 4 πε0 R Example 2.2 Two charges 3 × 10–8 C and –2 × 10–8 C are located 15 cm apart. At what point on the line joining the two charges is the electric potential zero? Take the potential at infinity to be zero. Solution Let us take the origin O at the location of the positive charge. The line joining the two charges is taken to be the x-axis; the negative charge is taken to be on the right side of the origin (Fig. 2.7). FIGURE 2.7 Let P be the required point on the x-axis where the potential is zero. If x is the x-coordinate of P, obviously x must be positive. (There is no possibility of potentials due to the two charges adding up to zero for x < 0.) If x lies between O and A, we have 1  3 × 10 – 8 2 × 10 –8  − x × 10 –2 4 πε0  (15 − x ) × 10 –2  = 0 where x is in cm. That is, 3 2 − = 0 2.2 x 15 − x which gives x = 9 cm. If x lies on the extended line OA, the required condition is 3 2 − = 0 EXAMPLE x x − 15 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance which gives x = 45 cm Thus, electric potential is zero at 9 cm and 45 cm away from the positive charge on the side of the negative charge. Note that the EXAMPLE formula for potential used in the calculation required choosing potential to be zero at infinity. 2.2 Example 2.3 Figures 2.8 (a) and (b) show the field lines of a positive and negative point charge respectively. Electric potential, equipotential-sufaces-12584/ FIGURE 2.8 equipotential (a) Give the signs of the potential difference VP – VQ; VB – VA. (b) Give the sign of the potential energy difference of a small negative charge between the points Q and P; A and B. surfaces: (c) Give the sign of the work done by the field in moving a small positive charge from Q to P. (d) Give the sign of the work done by the external agency in moving a small negative charge from B to A. (e) Does the kinetic energy of a small negative charge increase or decrease in going from B to A? Solution 1 (a) As V ∝ , VP > VQ. Thus, (VP – VQ) is positive. Also VB is less negative r than VA . Thus, VB > VA or (VB – VA) is positive. (b) A small negative charge will be attracted towards positive charge. The negative charge moves from higher potential energy to lower potential energy. Therefore the sign of potential energy difference of a small negative charge between Q and P is positive. Similarly, (P.E.)A > (P.E.)B and hence sign of potential energy differences is positive. http://video.mit.edu/watch/4-electrostatic-potential-elctric-energy-ev-conservative-field- (c) In moving a small positive charge from Q to P, work has to be done by an external agency against the electric field. Therefore, work done by the field is negative. (d) In moving a small negative charge from B to A work has to be done by the external agency. It is positive. EXAMPLE (e) Due to force of repulsion on the negative charge, velocity decreases and hence the kinetic energy decreases in going from B to A. 2.3 53 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 2.6 EQUIPOTENTIAL SURFACES An equipotential surface is a surface with a constant value of potential at all points on the surface. For a single charge q, the potential is given by Eq. (2.8): 1 q V = 4 πεo r This shows that V is a constant if r is constant. Thus, equipotential surfaces of a single point charge are concentric spherical surfaces centred at the charge. Now the electric field lines for a single charge q are radial lines starting from or ending at the charge, depending on whether q is positive or negative. Clearly, the electric field at every point is normal to the equipotential surface passing through that point. This is true in general: for any charge configuration, equipotential surface through a point is normal to the electric field at that point. The proof of this statement is simple. If the field were not normal to the equipotential surface, it would have non-zero component along the surface. To move a unit test charge against the direction of the component of the field, work would have to be done. But this is in contradiction to the definition of an equipotential FIGURE 2.9 For a surface: there is no potential difference between any two points on the single charge q surface and no work is required to move a test charge on the surface. (a) equipotential The electric field must, therefore, be normal to the equipotential surface surfaces are at every point. Equipotential surfaces offer an alternative visual picture spherical surfaces in addition to the picture of electric field lines around a charge centred at the configuration. charge, and (b) electric field lines are radial, starting from the charge if q > 0. FIGURE 2.10 Equipotential surfaces for a uniform electric field. For a uniform electric field E, say, along the x-axis, the equipotential surfaces are planes normal to the x-axis, i.e., planes parallel to the y-z plane (Fig. 2.10). Equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole and (b) two identical positive charges are shown in Fig. 2.11. FIGURE 2.11 Some equipotential surfaces for (a) a dipole, 54 (b) two identical positive charges. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance 2.6.1 Relation between field and potential Consider two closely spaced equipotential surfaces A and B (Fig. 2.12) with potential values V and V + dV, where dV is the change in V in the direction of the electric field E. Let P be a point on the surface B. d l is the perpendicular distance of the surface A from P. Imagine that a unit positive charge is moved along this perpendicular from the surface B to surface A against the electric field. The work done in this process is |E|dl. This work equals the potential difference VA–VB. Thus, |E|d l = V – (V + dV)= – dV V i.e., |E|= −δ (2.20) δl Since dV is negative, dV = – |dV|. we can rewrite FIGURE 2.12 From the Eq (2.20) as potential to the field. δV δV E = − = + (2.21) δl δl We thus arrive at two important conclusions concerning the relation between electric field and potential: (i) Electric field is in the direction in which the potential decreases steepest. (ii) Its magnitude is given by the change in the magnitude of potential per unit displacement normal to the equipotential surface at the point.