11.11 Show that the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation is equal to the de Broglie wavelength of its quantum (photon). 289 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Chapter Twelve ATOMS 12.1 INTRODUCTION By the nineteenth century, enough evidence had accumulated in favour of atomic hypothesis of matter. In 1897, the experiments on electric discharge through gases carried out by the English physicist J. J. Thomson (1856 – 1940) revealed that atoms of different elements contain negatively charged constituents (electrons) that are identical for all atoms. However, atoms on a whole are electrically neutral. Therefore, an atom must also contain some positive charge to neutralise the negative charge of the electrons. But what is the arrangement of the positive charge and the electrons inside the atom? In other words, what is the structure of an atom? The first model of atom was proposed by J. J. Thomson in 1898. According to this model, the positive charge of the atom is uniformly distributed throughout the volume of the atom and the negatively charged electrons are embedded in it like seeds in a watermelon. This model was picturesquely called plum pudding model of the atom. However subsequent studies on atoms, as described in this chapter, showed that the distribution of the electrons and positive charges are very different from that proposed in this model. We know that condensed matter (solids and liquids) and dense gases at all temperatures emit electromagnetic radiation in which a continuous distribution of several wavelengths is present, though with different 290 intensities. This radiation is considered to be due to oscillations of atoms Reprint 2025-26 Atoms and molecules, governed by the interaction of each atom or molecule with its neighbours. In contrast, light emitted from rarefied gases heated in a flame, or excited electrically in a glow tube such as the familiar neon sign or mercury vapour light has only certain discrete wavelengths. The spectrum appears as a series of bright lines. In such gases, the average spacing between atoms is large. Hence, the radiation emitted can be considered due to individual atoms rather than because of interactions between atoms or molecules. In the early nineteenth century it was also established that each element is associated with a characteristic spectrum of radiation, for example, hydrogen always gives a set of lines with fixed relative position between the lines. ErnstErnstErnstErnstErnst RutherfordRutherfordRutherfordRutherfordRutherford (1871(1871(1871(1871(1871 ––––– This fact suggested an intimate relationship between the 1937)1937)1937)1937)1937) New Zealand born, internal structure of an atom and the spectrum of British physicist who did radiation emitted by it. In 1885, Johann Jakob Balmer pioneering work on ERNST (1825 – 1898) obtained a simple empirical formula which radioactive radiation. He gave the wavelengths of a group of lines emitted by atomic discovered alpha-rays and hydrogen. Since hydrogen is simplest of the elements beta-rays. Along with known, we shall consider its spectrum in detail in this Federick Soddy, he created chapter. the modern theory of Ernst Rutherford (1871–1937), a former research radioactivity. He studied student of J. J. Thomson, was engaged in experiments on the ‘emanation’ of thorium α-particles emitted by some radioactive elements. In 1906, and discovered a new noble RUTHERFORDhe proposed a classic experiment of scattering of these gas, an isotope of radon, α-particles by atoms to investigate the atomic structure. now known as thoron. By This experiment was later performed around 1911 by Hans scattering alpha-rays from the metal foils, he (1871Geiger (1882–1945) and Ernst Marsden (1889–1970, who discovered the atomic –was 20 year-old student and had not yet earned his nucleus and proposed the bachelor’s degree). The details are discussed in Section planetary model of the 12.2. The explanation of the results led to the birth of atom. He also estimated theRutherford’s planetary model of atom (also called the 1937) approximate size of the nuclear model of the atom). According to this the entire nucleus. positive charge and most of the mass of the atom is concentrated in a small volume called the nucleus with electrons revolving around the nucleus just as planets revolve around the sun. Rutherford’s nuclear model was a major step towards how we see the atom today. However, it could not explain why atoms emit light of only discrete wavelengths. How could an atom as simple as hydrogen, consisting of a single electron and a single proton, emit a complex spectrum of specific wavelengths? In the classical picture of an atom, the electron revolves round the nucleus much like the way a planet revolves round the sun. However, we shall see that there are some serious difficulties in accepting such a model. 12.212.212.212.212.2 ALPHALPHALPHALPHA-PARLPHA ARARARTICLEAR TICLETICLETICLETICLE SSSCASSCACACATTERINGCATTERINGTTERINGTTERINGTTERING ANDANDANDANDAND RUTHERFORDUTHERFORDUTHERFORDUTHERFORD’SUTHERFORD NNNUCLEARNNUCLEARUCLEARUCLEARUCLEAR MODELODELODELODELODEL OFOFOFOFOF ATOMTOMTOMTOMTOM At the suggestion of Ernst Rutherford, in 1911, H. Geiger and E. Marsden performed some experiments. In one of their experiments, as shown in 291 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Fig. 12.1, they directed a beam of 5.5 MeV a-particles emitted from a 21483Bi radioactive source at a thin metal foil made of gold. Figure 12.2 shows a schematic diagram of this experiment. Alpha-particles emitted by a 21483Bi radioactive source were collimated into a narrow beam by their passage through lead bricks. The beam was allowed to fall on a thin foil of gold of thickness 2.1 × 10–7 m. The scattered alpha-particles were observed through a rotatable detector consisting of zinc sulphide screen and a microscope. The scattered alpha-particles on striking the screen produced brief light flashes or scintillations. These flashes may be viewed through a microscope and the FIGURE 12.1 Geiger-Marsden scattering experiment. distribution of the number of scattered The entire apparatus is placed in a vacuum chamber particles may be studied as a function (not shown in this figure). of angle of scattering. FIGURE 12.2 Schematic arrangement of the Geiger-Marsden experiment. A typical graph of the total number of a-particles scattered at different angles, in a given interval of time, is shown in Fig. 12.3. The dots in this figure represent the data points and the solid curve is the theoretical prediction based on the assumption that the target atom has a small, dense, positively charged nucleus. Many of the a-particles pass through the foil. It means that they do not suffer any collisions. Only about 0.14% of the incident a-particles scatter by more than 1°; and about 1 in 8000 deflect by more than 90°. Rutherford argued that, to deflect the a-particle 292 backwards, it must experience a large repulsive force. This force could Reprint 2025-26 Atoms be provided if the greater part of the mass of the atom and its positive charge were concentrated tightly at its centre. Then the incoming α-particle could get very close to the positive charge without penetrating it, and such a close encounter would result in a large deflection. This agreement supported the hypothesis of the nuclear atom. This is why Rutherford is credited with the discovery of the nucleus. In Rutherford’s nuclear model of the atom, the entire positive charge and most of the mass of the atom are concentrated in the nucleus with the electrons some distance away. The electrons would be moving in orbits FIGUREFIGUREFIGUREFIGUREFIGURE 12.312.312.312.312.3 Experimental data points (shown byabout the nucleus just as the planets dots) on scattering of α-particles by a thin foil at do around the sun. Rutherford’s different angles obtained by Geiger and Marsden experiments suggested the size of using the setup shown in Figs. 12.1 and the nucleus to be about 10–15 m to 12.2. Rutherford’s nuclear model predicts the solid 10–14 m. From kinetic theory, the size curve which is seen to be in good agreement with of an atom was known to be 10–10 m, experiment. about 10,000 to 100,000 times larger than the size of the nucleus. Thus, the electrons would seem to be at a distance from the nucleus of about 10,000 to 100,000 times the size of the nucleus itself. Thus, most of an atom is empty space. With the atom being largely empty space, it is easy to see why most α-particles go right through a thin metal foil. However, when α-particle happens to come near a nucleus, the intense electric field there scatters it through a large angle. The atomic electrons, being so light, do not appreciably affect the α-particles. The scattering data shown in Fig. 12.3 can be analysed by employing Rutherford’s nuclear model of the atom. As the gold foil is very thin, it can be assumed that α-particles will suffer not more than one scattering during their passage through it. Therefore, computation of the trajectory of an alpha-particle scattered by a single nucleus is enough. Alpha- particles are nuclei of helium atoms and, therefore, carry two units, 2e, of positive charge and have the mass of the helium atom. The charge of the gold nucleus is Ze, where Z is the atomic number of the atom; for gold Z = 79. Since the nucleus of gold is about 50 times heavier than an α-particle, it is reasonable to assume that it remains stationary throughout the scattering process. Under these assumptions, the trajectory of an alpha-particle can be computed employing Newton’s second law of motion and the Coulomb’s law for electrostatic force of repulsion between the alpha-particle and the positively charged nucleus. 293 Reprint 2025-26 Physics The magnitude of this force is 1 (2e )( Ze ) F = 2 (12.1) 4 πε0 r where r is the distance between the a-particle and the nucleus. The force is directed along the line joining the a-particle and the nucleus. The magnitude and direction of the force on an a-particle continuously changes as it approaches the nucleus and recedes away from it. 12.2.1 Alpha-particle trajectory The trajectory traced by an a-particle depends on the impact parameter, b of collision. The impact parameter is the perpendicular distance of the initial velocity vector of the a-particle from the centre of the nucleus (Fig. 12.4). A given beam of a-particles has a distribution of impact parameters b, so that the beam is scattered in various directions with different probabilities (Fig. 12.4). (In a beam, all particles have nearly same kinetic energy.) It is seen that an a-particle close to the nucleus (small impact parameter) suffers large scattering. In case of head-on collision, the impact parameter is minimum and the a-particle rebounds back (q @ p). For a large impact parameter, the a-particle goes nearly undeviated and has a small deflection (q @ 0). FIGURE 12.4 Trajectory of a-particles in the The fact that only a small fraction of the coulomb field of a target nucleus. The impact number of incident particles rebound back parameter, b and scattering angle q indicates that the number of a-particles are also depicted. undergoing head on collision is small. This, in turn, implies that the mass and positive charge of the atom is concentrated in a small volume. Rutherford scattering therefore, is a powerful way to determine an upper limit to the size of the nucleus. Example 12.1 In the Rutherford’s nuclear model of the atom, the nucleus (radius about 10–15 m) is analogous to the sun about which the electron move in orbit (radius » 10–10 m) like the earth orbits around the sun. If the dimensions of the solar system had the same proportions as those of the atom, would the earth be closer to or farther away from the sun than actually it is? The radius of earth’s orbit is about 1.5 ´ 1011 m. The radius of sun is taken as 7 ´ 108 m. Solution The ratio of the radius of electron’s orbit to the radius of nucleus is (10–10 m)/(10–15 m) = 105, that is, the radius of the electron’s orbit is 105 times larger than the radius of nucleus. If the radius of the earth’s orbit around the sun were 105 times larger than the radius of the sun, the radius of the earth’s orbit would be 105 ´ 7 ´ 108 m = 12.1 7 ´ 1013 m. This is more than 100 times greater than the actual orbital radius of earth. Thus, the earth would be much farther away from the sun. It implies that an atom contains a much greater fraction of empty EXAMPLE 294 space than our solar system does. Reprint 2025-26 Atoms Example 12.2 In a Geiger-Marsden experiment, what is the distance of closest approach to the nucleus of a 7.7 MeV a-particle before it comes momentarily to rest and reverses its direction? Solution The key idea here is that throughout the scattering process, the total mechanical energy of the system consisting of an a-particle and a gold nucleus is conserved. The system’s initial mechanical energy is Ei, before the particle and nucleus interact, and it is equal to its mechanical energy Ef when the a-particle momentarily stops. The initial energy Ei is just the kinetic energy K of the incoming a- particle. The final energy Ef is just the electric potential energy U of the system. The potential energy U can be calculated from Eq. (12.1). Let d be the centre-to-centre distance between the a-particle and the gold nucleus when the a-particle is at its stopping point. Then we can write the conservation of energy Ei = Ef as 1 (2e )( Ze ) 2 Ze 2 K = = 4 πε0 d 4 πε0 d Thus the distance of closest approach d is given by 2 Ze 2 d = 4 πε0 K The maximum kinetic energy found in a-particles of natural origin is 7.7 MeV or 1.2 × 10–12 J. Since 1/4pe0 = 9.0 × 109 N m2/C2. Therefore with e = 1.6 × 10–19 C, we have, (2)(9.0 × 10 9 Nm 2 / C 2 )(1.6 × 10 –19 C )2 Z d = − 12 1.2 × 10 J = 3.84 × 10–16 Z m The atomic number of foil material gold is Z = 79, so that d (Au) = 3.0 × 10–14 m = 30 fm. (1 fm (i.e. fermi) = 10–15 m.) The radius of gold nucleus is, therefore, less than 3.0 × 10–14 m. This is not in very good agreement with the observed result as the actual radius of gold nucleus is 6 fm. The cause of discrepancy is that the EXAMPLE distance of closest approach is considerably larger than the sum of the radii of the gold nucleus and the a-particle. Thus, the a-particle reverses its motion without ever actually touching the gold nucleus. 12.2 12.2.2 Electron orbits The Rutherford nuclear model of the atom which involves classical concepts, pictures the atom as an electrically neutral sphere consisting of a very small, massive and positively charged nucleus at the centre surrounded by the revolving electrons in their respective dynamically stable orbits. The electrostatic force of attraction, Fe between the revolving electrons and the nucleus provides the requisite centripetal force (Fc) to keep them in their orbits. Thus, for a dynamically stable orbit in a hydrogen atom Fe = Fc 1 e 2 mv 2 = (12.2) 295 r 4 πε0 r 2 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Thus the relation between the orbit radius and the electron velocity is e 2 r = 2 (12.3) 4 πε0mv The kinetic energy (K) and electrostatic potential energy (U) of the electron in hydrogen atom are 1 2 e 2 e 2 K = mv = and U = − 2 8 πε0r 4 πε0r (The negative sign in U signifies that the electrostatic force is in the –r direction.) Thus the total energy E of the electron in a hydrogen atom is e 2 e 2 E = K + U = − 8 πε0r 4 πε0r e 2 = − (12.4) 8 πε0r The total energy of the electron is negative. This implies the fact that the electron is bound to the nucleus. If E were positive, an electron will not follow a closed orbit around the nucleus. Example 12.3 It is found experimentally that 13.6 eV energy is required to separate a hydrogen atom into a proton and an electron. Compute the orbital radius and the velocity of the electron in a hydrogen atom. Solution Total energy of the electron in hydrogen atom is –13.6 eV = –13.6 × 1.6 × 10–19 J = –2.2 ×10–18 J. Thus from Eq. (12.4), we have e 2 − 18 E = − = −2.2 × 10 J 8 πε0r This gives the orbital radius e 2 (9 × 10 9 N m 2 /C 2 )(1.6 × 10 −19 C)2 r = − = − −18 8 πε0 E (2)(–2.2 × 10 J) = 5.3 × 10–11 m. 12.3 The velocity of the revolving electron can be computed from Eq. (12.3) with m = 9.1 × 10–31 kg, e 6 v = = 2.2 × 10 m/s. EXAMPLE 4 πε0 mr 12.3 ATOMIC SPECTRA As mentioned in Section 12.1, each element has a characteristic spectrum of radiation, which it emits. When an atomic gas or vapour is excited at low pressure, usually by passing an electric current through it, the emitted radiation has a spectrum which contains certain specific wavelengths 296 only. A spectrum of this kind is termed as emission line spectrum and it Reprint 2025-26 Atoms consists of bright lines on a dark background. The spectrum emitted by atomic hydrogen is shown in Fig. 12.5. Study of emission line spectra of a material can therefore serve as a type of “fingerprint” for identification of the gas. When white light passes through a gas and we analyse the transmitted light using a spectrometer we find some dark lines in the FIGURE 12.5 Emission lines in the spectrum of hydrogen. spectrum. These dark lines correspond precisely to those wavelengths which were found in the emission line spectrum of the gas. This is called the absorption spectrum of the material of the gas.

12.5 A hydrogen atom initially in the ground level absorbs a photon, which excites it to the n = 4 level. Determine the wavelength and frequency of photon.

12.6 DE BROGLIE’S EXPLANATION OF BOHR’S SECOND POSTULATE OF QUANTISATION Of all the postulates, Bohr made in his model of the atom, perhaps the most puzzling is his second postulate. It states that the angular momentum of the electron orbiting around the nucleus is quantised (that is, Ln = nh/2p; n = 1, 2, 3 …). Why should the angular momentum have only those values that are integral multiples of h/2p? The French physicist Louis de Broglie explained this puzzle in 1923, ten years after Bohr proposed his model. We studied, in Chapter 11, about the de Broglie’s hypothesis that material particles, such as electrons, also have a wave nature. C. J. Davisson and L. H. Germer later experimentally verified the wave nature of electrons in 1927. Louis de Broglie argued that the electron in its circular orbit, as proposed by Bohr, must be seen as a particle wave. In analogy to waves travelling on a string, particle waves too can lead to standing waves under resonant conditions. From FIGURE 12.8 A standing wave Chapter 14 of Class XI Physics textbook, we know that when is shown on a circular orbit a string is plucked, a vast number of wavelengths are excited. where four de Broglie wavelengths fit into theHowever only those wavelengths survive which have nodes circumference of the orbit. at the ends and form the standing wave in the string. It means that in a string, standing waves are formed when the total distance travelled by a wave down the string and back is one wavelength, two wavelengths, or any integral number of wavelengths. Waves with other wavelengths interfere with themselves upon reflection and their amplitudes quickly drop to zero. For an electron moving in nth circular orbit of radius rn, the total distance is the circumference of the orbit, 3012prn. Thus Reprint 2025-26 Physics 2p rn = nl, n = 1, 2, 3... (12.12) Figure 12.8 illustrates a standing particle wave on a circular orbit for n = 4, i.e., 2prn = 4l, where l is the de Broglie wavelength of the electron moving in nth orbit. From Chapter 11, we have l = h/p, where p is the magnitude of the electron’s momentum. If the speed of the electron is much less than the speed of light, the momentum is mvn. Thus, l = h/ mvn. From Eq. (12.12), we have 2p rn = n h/mvn or m vn rn = nh/2p This is the quantum condition proposed by Bohr for the angular momentum of the electron [Eq. (12.15)]. In Section 12.5, we saw that this equation is the basis of explaining the discrete orbits and energy levels in hydrogen atom. Thus de Broglie hypothesis provided an explanation for Bohr’s second postulate for the quantisation of angular momentum of the orbiting electron. The quantised electron orbits and energy states are due to the wave nature of the electron and only resonant standing waves can persist. Bohr’s model, involving classical trajectory picture (planet-like electron orbiting the nucleus), correctly predicts the gross features of the hydrogenic atoms*, in particular, the frequencies of the radiation emitted or selectively absorbed. This model however has many limitations. Some are: (i) The Bohr model is applicable to hydrogenic atoms. It cannot be extended even to mere two electron atoms such as helium. The analysis of atoms with more than one electron was attempted on the lines of Bohr’s model for hydrogenic atoms but did not meet with any success. Difficulty lies in the fact that each electron interacts not only with the positively charged nucleus but also with all other electrons. The formulation of Bohr model involves electrical force between positively charged nucleus and electron. It does not include the electrical forces between electrons which necessarily appear in multi-electron atoms. (ii) While the Bohr’s model correctly predicts the frequencies of the light emitted by hydrogenic atoms, the model is unable to explain the relative intensities of the frequencies in the spectrum. In emission spectrum of hydrogen, some of the visible frequencies have weak intensity, others strong. Why? Experimental observations depict that some transitions are more favoured than others. Bohr’s model is unable to account for the intensity variations. Bohr’s model presents an elegant picture of an atom and cannot be generalised to complex atoms. For complex atoms we have to use a new and radical theory based on Quantum Mechanics, which provides a more complete picture of the atomic structure. * Hydrogenic atoms are the atoms consisting of a nucleus with positive charge +Ze and a single electron, where Z is the proton number. Examples are hydrogen atom, singly ionised helium, doubly ionised lithium, and so forth. In these 302 atoms more complex electron-electron interactions are nonexistent. Reprint 2025-26 Atoms SUMMARY 1. Atom, as a whole, is electrically neutral and therefore contains equal amount of positive and negative charges. 2. In Thomson’s model, an atom is a spherical cloud of positive charges with electrons embedded in it. 3. In Rutherford’s model, most of the mass of the atom and all its positive charge are concentrated in a tiny nucleus (typically one by ten thousand the size of an atom), and the electrons revolve around it. 4. Rutherford nuclear model has two main difficulties in explaining the structure of atom: (a) It predicts that atoms are unstable because the accelerated electrons revolving around the nucleus must spiral into the nucleus. This contradicts the stability of matter. (b) It cannot explain the characteristic line spectra of atoms of different elements. 5. Atoms of most of the elements are stable and emit characteristic spectrum. The spectrum consists of a set of isolated parallel lines termed as line spectrum. It provides useful information about the atomic structure. 6. To explain the line spectra emitted by atoms, as well as the stability of atoms, Niel’s Bohr proposed a model for hydrogenic (single elctron) atoms. He introduced three postulates and laid the foundations of quantum mechanics: (a) In a hydrogen atom, an electron revolves in certain stable orbits (called stationary orbits) without the emission of radiant energy. (b) The stationary orbits are those for which the angular momentum is some integral multiple of h/2p. (Bohr’s quantisation condition.) That is L = nh/2p, where n is an integer called the principal quantum number. (c) The third postulate states that an electron might make a transition from one of its specified non-radiating orbits to another of lower energy. When it does so, a photon is emitted having energy equal to the energy difference between the initial and final states. The frequency (n) of the emitted photon is then given by hn = Ei – Ef An atom absorbs radiation of the same frequency the atom emits, in which case the electron is transferred to an orbit with a higher value of n. Ei + hn = Ef 7. As a result of the quantisation condition of angular momentum, the electron orbits the nucleus at only specific radii. For a hydrogen atom it is given by  n 2   h  2 4 πε0 rn = 2  m   2 π  e The total energy is also quantised: me 4 E n = − 2 2 2 8n ε0 h = –13.6 eV/n2 The n = 1 state is called ground state. In hydrogen atom the ground state energy is –13.6 eV. Higher values of n correspond to excited states (n > 1). Atoms are excited to these higher states by collisions with other atoms or electrons or by absorption of a photon of right frequency. 303 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 8. de Broglie’s hypothesis that electrons have a wavelength λ = h/mv gave an explanation for Bohr’s quantised orbits by bringing in the wave- particle duality. The orbits correspond to circular standing waves in which the circumference of the orbit equals a whole number of wavelengths. 9. Bohr’s model is applicable only to hydrogenic (single electron) atoms. It cannot be extended to even two electron atoms such as helium. This model is also unable to explain for the relative intensities of the frequencies emitted even by hydrogenic atoms. POINTSPOINTSPOINTSPOINTSPOINTS TOTOTOTOTO PONDERPONDERPONDERPONDERPONDER 1. Both the Thomson’s as well as the Rutherford’s models constitute an unstable system. Thomson’s model is unstable electrostatically, while Rutherford’s model is unstable because of electromagnetic radiation of orbiting electrons. 2. What made Bohr quantise angular momentum (second postulate) and not some other quantity? Note, h has dimensions of angular momentum, and for circular orbits, angular momentum is a very relevant quantity. The second postulate is then so natural! 3. The orbital picture in Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom was inconsistent with the u quantum mechanics in which Bohr’s orbits are regions where the electron may be found with large probability. 4. Unlike the situation in the solar system, where planet-planet gravitational forces are very small as compared to the gravitational force of the sun on each planet (because the mass of the sun is so much greater than the mass of any of the planets), the electron-electron electric force interaction is comparable in magnitude to the electron- nucleus electrical force, because the charges and distances are of the same order of magnitude. This is the reason why the Bohr’s model with its planet-like electron is not applicable to many electron atoms. 5. Bohr laid the foundation of the quantum theory by postulating specific orbits in which electrons do not radiate. Bohr’s model include only one quantum number n. The new theory called quantum mechanics supports Bohr’s postulate. However in quantum mechanics (more generally accepted), a given energy level may not correspond to just one quantum state. For example, a state is characterised by four quantum numbers (n, l, m, and s), but for a pure Coulomb potential (as in hydrogen atom) the energy depends only on n. 6. In Bohr model, contrary to ordinary classical expectation, the frequency of revolution of an electron in its orbit is not connected to the frequency of spectral line. The later is the difference between two orbital energies divided by h. For transitions between large quantum numbers (n to n – 1, n very large), however, the two coincide as expected. 7. Bohr’s semiclassical model based on some aspects of classical physics and some aspects of modern physics also does not provide a true picture of the simplest hydrogenic atoms. The true picture is quantum mechanical affair which differs from Bohr model in a number of fundamental ways. But then if the Bohr model is not strictly correct, why do we bother about it? The reasons which make Bohr’s model still useful are: Reprint 2025-26 Atoms (i) The model is based on just three postulates but accounts for almost all the general features of the hydrogen spectrum. (ii) The model incorporates many of the concepts we have learnt in classical physics. (iii) The model demonstrates how a theoretical physicist occasionally must quite literally ignore certain problems of approach in hopes of being able to make some predictions. If the predictions of the theory or model agree with experiment, a theoretician then must somehow hope to explain away or rationalise the problems that were ignored along the way. EXERCISES