2.7 POTENTIAL ENERGY OF A SYSTEM OF CHARGES Consider first the simple case of two charges q1and q2 with position vector r1 and r2 relative to some origin. Let us calculate the work done (externally) in building up this configuration. This means that we consider the charges q1 and q2 initially at infinity and determine the work done by an external agency to bring the charges to the given locations. Suppose, first the charge q1 is brought from infinity to the point r1. There is no external field against which work needs to be done, so work done in bringing q1 from infinity to r1 is zero. This charge produces a potential in space given by 1 q1 V1 = 4 πε0 r1P where r1P is the distance of a point P in space from the location of q1. From the definition of potential, work done in bringing charge q2 from infinity to the point r2 is q2 times the potential at r2 due to q1: 1 q1q 2 work done on q2 = 4 πε0 r12 55 Reprint 2025-26 Physics where r12 is the distance between points 1 and 2. Since electrostatic force is conservative, this work gets stored in the form of potential energy of the system. Thus, the potential energy of a system of two charges q1 and q2 is FIGURE 2.13 Potential energy of a 1 q1q 2 U = system of charges q1 and q2 is 4 πε0 r12 (2.22) directly proportional to the product of charges and inversely to the Obviously, if q2 was brought first to its present location and distance between them. q1 brought later, the potential energy U would be the same. More generally, the potential energy expression, Eq. (2.22), is unaltered whatever way the charges are brought to the specified locations, because of path-independence of work for electrostatic force. Equation (2.22) is true for any sign of q1and q2. If q1q2 > 0, potential energy is positive. This is as expected, since for like charges (q1q2 > 0), electrostatic force is repulsive and a positive amount of work is needed to be done against this force to bring the charges from infinity to a finite distance apart. For unlike charges (q1 q2 < 0), the electrostatic force is attractive. In that case, a positive amount of work is needed against this force to take the charges from the given location to infinity. In other words, a negative amount of work is needed for the reverse path (from infinity to the present locations), so the potential energy is negative. Equation (2.22) is easily generalised for a system of any number of point charges. Let us calculate the potential energy of a system of three charges q1, q2 and q3 located at r1, r2, r3, respectively. To bring q1 first from infinity to r1, no work is required. Next we bring q2 from infinity to r2. As before, work done in this step is 1 q1q 2 q 2 V1 ( r2 ) = (2.23) 4 πε0 r12 The charges q1 and q2 produce a potential, which at any point P is given by 1  q1 q 2  V1, 2 = + (2.24) 4 πε0  r1P r2 P  Work done next in bringing q3 from infinity to the point r3 is q3 times V1, 2 at r3 1  q1q 3 q 2 q 3  q 3 V1, 2 ( r3 ) = + (2.25) 4 πε0  r13 r23  The total work done in assembling the charges at the given locations is obtained by adding the work done in different steps [Eq. (2.23) and Eq. (2.25)], 1  q1q 2 q1q 3 q 2 q 3  U = + + (2.26) FIGURE 2.14 Potential energy of a 4 πε0  r12 r13 r23  system of three charges is given by Again, because of the conservative nature of the Eq. (2.26), with the notation given electrostatic force (or equivalently, the path in the figure. independence of work done), the final expression for U, Eq. (2.26), is independent of the manner in which 56 the configuration is assembled. The potential energy Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance is characteristic of the present state of configuration, and not the way the state is achieved. Example 2.4 Four charges are arranged at the corners of a square ABCD of side d, as shown in Fig. 2.15.(a) Find the work required to put together this arrangement. (b) A charge q0 is brought to the centre E of the square, the four charges being held fixed at its corners. How much extra work is needed to do this? FIGURE 2.15 Solution (a) Since the work done depends on the final arrangement of the charges, and not on how they are put together, we calculate work needed for one way of putting the charges at A, B, C and D. Suppose, first the charge +q is brought to A, and then the charges –q, +q, and –q are brought to B, C and D, respectively. The total work needed can be calculated in steps: (i) Work needed to bring charge +q to A when no charge is present elsewhere: this is zero. (ii) Work needed to bring –q to B when +q is at A. This is given by (charge at B) × (electrostatic potential at B due to charge +q at A)  q  q 2 = −q × − ε  4 πε0 d = 4 π 0 d (iii) Work needed to bring charge +q to C when +q is at A and –q is at B. This is given by (charge at C) × (potential at C due to charges at A and B)  + q −q  = + q + ε 0 d   4 πε0 d 2 4 π −q 2  1  = 4 πε0 d 1 − 2  (iv) Work needed to bring –q to D when +q at A,–q at B, and +q at C. This is given by (charge at D) × (potential at D due to charges at A, B and C)  + q −q q  = −q + + ε  4 π 0 d 4 πε0 d 2 4 πε0 d  EXAMPLE −q 2  1  = 4 πε0 d  2 − 2  2.4 57 Reprint 2025-26 Physics Add the work done in steps (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv). The total work required is −q 2   1   1   =  4 πε0 d ( 0 ) + (1) + 1 − 2 +  2 − 2    −q 2 = 4 − 2 ( ) 4 πε0 d The work done depends only on the arrangement of the charges, and not how they are assembled. By definition, this is the total electrostatic energy of the charges. (Students may try calculating same work/energy by taking charges in any other order they desire and convince themselves that the energy will remain the same.) 2.4 the(b) Thefourextrachargesworkarenecessaryat A, B, CtoandbringD ais chargeq0 × (electrostaticq0 to the pointpotentialE whenat E due to the charges at A, B, C and D). The electrostatic potential at E is clearly zero since potential due to A and C is cancelled by that due to B and D. Hence, no work is required to bring any charge to EXAMPLE point E. 2.8 POTENTIAL ENERGY IN AN EXTERNAL FIELD 2.8.1 Potential energy of a single charge In Section 2.7, the source of the electric field was specified – the charges and their locations - and the potential energy of the system of those charges was determined. In this section, we ask a related but a distinct question. What is the potential energy of a charge q in a given field? This question was, in fact, the starting point that led us to the notion of the electrostatic potential (Sections 2.1 and 2.2). But here we address this question again to clarify in what way it is different from the discussion in Section 2.7. The main difference is that we are now concerned with the potential energy of a charge (or charges) in an external field. The external field E is not produced by the given charge(s) whose potential energy we wish to calculate. E is produced by sources external to the given charge(s).The external sources may be known, but often they are unknown or unspecified; what is specified is the electric field E or the electrostatic potential V due to the external sources. We assume that the charge q does not significantly affect the sources producing the external field. This is true if q is very small, or the external sources are held fixed by other unspecified forces. Even if q is finite, its influence on the external sources may still be ignored in the situation when very strong sources far away at infinity produce a finite field E in the region of interest. Note again that we are interested in determining the potential energy of a given charge q (and later, a system of charges) in the external field; we are not interested in the potential energy of the sources producing the external electric field. The external electric field E and the corresponding external potential V may vary from point to point. By definition, V at a point P is the work 58 done in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to the point P. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (We continue to take potential at infinity to be zero.) Thus, work done in bringing a charge q from infinity to the point P in the external field is qV. This work is stored in the form of potential energy of q. If the point P has position vector r relative to some origin, we can write: Potential energy of q at r in an external field = qV(r) (2.27) where V(r) is the external potential at the point r. Thus, if an electron with charge q = e = 1.6×10–19 C is accelerated by a potential difference of DV = 1 volt, it would gain energy of qDV = 1.6 × 10–19J. This unit of energy is defined as 1 electron volt or 1eV, i.e., 1 eV=1.6 × 10–19J. The units based on eV are most commonly used in atomic, nuclear and particle physics, (1 keV = 103eV = 1.6 × 10–16J, 1 MeV = 106eV = 1.6 × 10–13J, 1 GeV = 109eV = 1.6 × 10–10J and 1 TeV = 1012eV = 1.6 × 10–7J). [This has already been defined on Page 117, XI 2.8.2 Potential energy of a system of two charges in an external field Next, we ask: what is the potential energy of a system of two charges q1 and q2 located at r1and r2, respectively, in an external field? First, we calculate the work done in bringing the charge q1 from infinity to r1. Work done in this step is q1 V(r1), using Eq. (2.27). Next, we consider the work done in bringing q2 to r2. In this step, work is done not only against the external field E but also against the field due to q1. Work done on q2 against the external field = q2 V (r2) Work done on q2 against the field due to q1 q1q 2 = 4 πεo r12 where r12 is the distance between q1 and q2. We have made use of Eqs. (2.27) and (2.22). By the superposition principle for fields, we add up the work done on q2 against the two fields (E and that due to q1): Work done in bringing q2 to r2 q1q 2 = q 2 V ( r2 ) + (2.28) 4 πεo r12 Thus, Potential energy of the system = the total work done in assembling the configuration q1q 2 = q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) + (2.29) 4 πε0r12 Example 2.5 (a) Determine the electrostatic potential energy of a system consisting of two charges 7 mC and –2 mC (and with no external field) placed at (–9 cm, 0, 0) and (9 cm, 0, 0) respectively. EXAMPLE (b) How much work is required to separate the two charges infinitely 2.5 away from each other? 59 Reprint 2025-26 Physics (c) Suppose that the same system of charges is now placed in an external electric field E = A (1/r 2); A = 9 × 105 NC–1 m2. What would the electrostatic energy of the configuration be? Solution 1 q1q 2 9 7 × ( −2) × 10 −12 (a) U = = 9 × 10 × = –0.7 J. 4 πε0 r 0.18 (b) W = U2 – U1 = 0 – U = 0 – (–0.7) = 0.7 J. (c) The mutual interaction energy of the two charges remains unchanged. In addition, there is the energy of interaction of the two charges with the external electric field. We find, 7 µ C −µ2 C q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) = A + A 0.09m 0.09m 2.5 and the net electrostatic energy is q1q 2 7 µC −µ2 C q1V ( r1 ) + q 2 V ( r2 ) + = A + A − 0.7 J 4 πε0r12 0.09 m 0.09 m EXAMPLE = 70 − 20 − 0.7 = 49.3 J 2.8.3 Potential energy of a dipole in an external field Consider a dipole with charges q1 = +q and q2 = –q placed in a uniform electric field E, as shown in Fig. 2.16. As seen in the last chapter, in a uniform electric field, the dipole experiences no net force; but experiences a torque ttttt given by ttttt ===== p × E (2.30) which will tend to rotate it (unless p is parallel or antiparallel to E). Suppose an external torque text is applied in such a manner that it just neutralises this torque and rotates it in the plane of paper from angle q0 to angle q1 at an infinitesimal angular speed and without angular acceleration. The amount of work done by the external torque will be given by FIGURE 2.16 Potential energy of a dipole in a uniform external field. = pE ( cosθ0 − cosθ1 ) (2.31) This work is stored as the potential energy of the system. We can then associate potential energy U(q) with an inclination q of the dipole. Similar to other potential energies, there is a freedom in choosing the angle where the potential energy U is taken to be zero. A natural choice is to take q0 = p / 2. (An explanation for it is provided towards the end of discussion.) We can then write, (2.32) 60 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance This expression can alternately be understood also from Eq. (2.29). We apply Eq. (2.29) to the present system of two charges +q and –q. The potential energy expression then reads q 2 U ′ (θ) = q [V ( r1 ) − V ( r2 )] − (2.33) 4 πε0 × 2a Here, r1 and r2 denote the position vectors of +q and –q. Now, the potential difference between positions r1 and r2 equals the work done in bringing a unit positive charge against field from r2 to r1. The displacement parallel to the force is 2a cosq. Thus, [V(r1)–V (r2)] = –E × 2a cosq . We thus obtain, q 2 q 2 U ′ (θ) = − pE cosθ− = − p.E − (2.34) 4 πε0 × 2a 4 πε0 × 2a We note that U¢(q) differs from U(q ) by a quantity which is just a constant for a given dipole. Since a constant is insignificant for potential energy, we can drop the second term in Eq. (2.34) and it then reduces to Eq. (2.32). We can now understand why we took q0=p/2. In this case, the work done against the external field E in bringing +q and – q are equal and opposite and cancel out, i.e., q [V (r1) – V (r2)]=0. Example 2.6 A molecule of a substance has a permanent electric dipole moment of magnitude 10–29 C m. A mole of this substance is polarised (at low temperature) by applying a strong electrostatic field of magnitude 106 V m–1. The direction of the field is suddenly changed by an angle of 60º. Estimate the heat released by the substance in aligning its dipoles along the new direction of the field. For simplicity, assume 100% polarisation of the sample. Solution Here, dipole moment of each molecules = 10–29 C m As 1 mole of the substance contains 6 × 1023 molecules, total dipole moment of all the molecules, p = 6 × 1023 × 10–29 C m = 6 × 10–6 C m Initial potential energy, Ui = –pE cos q = –6×10–6×106 cos 0° = –6 J Final potential energy (when q = 60°), Uf = –6 × 10–6 × 106 cos 60° = –3 J Change in potential energy = –3 J – (–6J) = 3 J EXAMPLE So, there is loss in potential energy. This must be the energy released by the substance in the form of heat in aligning its dipoles. 2.6

2.15 ENERGY STORED IN A CAPACITOR A capacitor, as we have seen above, is a system of two conductors with charge Q and –Q. To determine the energy stored in this configuration, consider initially two uncharged conductors 1 and 2. Imagine next a process of transferring charge from conductor 2 to conductor 1 bit by 73 Reprint 2025-26 Physics bit, so that at the end, conductor 1 gets charge Q. By charge conservation, conductor 2 has charge –Q at the end (Fig 2.30 ). In transferring positive charge from conductor 2 to conductor 1, work will be done externally, since at any stage conductor 1 is at a higher potential than conductor 2. To calculate the total work done, we first calculate the work done in a small step involving transfer of an infinitesimal (i.e., vanishingly small) amount of charge. Consider the intermediate situation when the conductors 1 and 2 have charges Q¢ and FIGURE 2.30 (a) Work done in a small –Q¢ respectively. At this stage, the potential difference step of building charge on conductor 1 V¢ between conductors 1 to 2 is Q¢/C, where C is thefrom Q¢ to Q¢ + d Q¢. (b) Total work done in charging the capacitor may be capacitance of the system. Next imagine that a small viewed as stored in the energy of charge d Q¢ is transferred from conductor 2 to 1. Work electric field between the plates. done in this step (d W), resulting in charge Q¢ on conductor 1 increasing to Q¢+ d Q¢, is given by Q ′ δW = V ′δQ ′ = δQ ′ (2.68) C Integrating eq. (2.68) Q 2 Q 2 Q ′ 1 Q ′ Q δ Q ’ = = W = ∫ C 2 2C 0 C 0 We can write the final result, in different ways Q 2 1 2 1 W = = CV = QV (2.69) 2C 2 2 Since electrostatic force is conservative, this work is stored in the form of potential energy of the system. For the same reason, the final result for potential energy [Eq. (2.69)] is independent of the manner in which the charge configuration of the capacitor is built up. When the capacitor discharges, this stored-up energy is released. It is possible to view the potential energy of the capacitor as ‘stored’ in the electric field between the plates. To see this, consider for simplicity, a parallel plate capacitor [of area A (of each plate) and separation d between the plates]. Energy stored in the capacitor 1 Q 2 ( Aσ)2 d = = × (2.70) 2 C 2 ε0 A The surface charge density s is related to the electric field E between the plates, σ E = (2.71) ε0 From Eqs. (2.70) and (2.71) , we get Energy stored in the capacitor 2 × A d (2.72) U = (1/2 ) ε0 E 74 Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance Note that Ad is the volume of the region between the plates (where electric field alone exists). If we define energy density as energy stored per unit volume of space, Eq (2.72) shows that Energy density of electric field, u =(1/2)e0E 2 (2.73) Though we derived Eq. (2.73) for the case of a parallel plate capacitor, the result on energy density of an electric field is, in fact, very general and holds true for electric field due to any configuration of charges. Example 2.10 (a) A 900 pF capacitor is charged by 100 V battery [Fig. 2.31(a)]. How much electrostatic energy is stored by the capacitor? (b) The capacitor is disconnected from the battery and connected to another 900 pF capacitor [Fig. 2.31(b)]. What is the electrostatic energy stored by the system? FIGURE 2.31 Solution (a) The charge on the capacitor is Q = CV = 900 × 10–12 F × 100 V = 9 × 10–8 C The energy stored by the capacitor is = (1/2) CV 2 = (1/2) QV = (1/2) × 9 × 10–8C × 100 V = 4.5 × 10–6 J (b) In the steady situation, the two capacitors have their positive EXAMPLE plates at the same potential, and their negative plates at the same potential. Let the common potential difference be V¢. The 2.10 75 Reprint 2025-26 Physics charge on each capacitor is then Q¢ = CV¢. By charge conservation, Q¢ = Q/2. This implies V¢ = V/2. The total energy of the system is 1 1 − 6 = 2 × Q ' V ' = QV = 2.25 × 10 J 2 4 Thus in going from (a) to (b), though no charge is lost; the final energy is only half the initial energy. Where has the remaining energy gone? 2.10 There is a transient period before the system settles to the situation (b). During this period, a transient current flows from the first capacitor to the second. Energy is lost during this time in EXAMPLE the form of heat and electromagnetic radiation. SUMMARY 1. Electrostatic force is a conservative force. Work done by an external force (equal and opposite to the electrostatic force) in bringing a charge q from a point R to a point P is q(VP–VR), which is the difference in potential energy of charge q between the final and initial points. 2. Potential at a point is the work done per unit charge (by an external agency) in bringing a charge from infinity to that point. Potential at a point is arbitrary to within an additive constant, since it is the potential difference between two points which is physically significant. If potential at infinity is chosen to be zero; potential at a point with position vector r due to a point charge Q placed at the origin is given is given by 1 Q V ( r ) = 4 πεo r 3. The electrostatic potential at a point with position vector r due to a point dipole of dipole moment p placed at the origin is 1 p.rˆ V ( r ) = 2 4 πεo r The result is true also for a dipole (with charges –q and q separated by 2a) for r >> a. 4. For a charge configuration q1, q2, ..., qn with position vectors r1, r2, ... rn, the potential at a point P is given by the superposition principle 1 q1 q 2 qn V = ( + + ... + ) 4 πε0 r1P r2P rnP where r1P is the distance between q1 and P, as and so on. 5. An equipotential surface is a surface over which potential has a constant value. For a point charge, concentric spheres centred at a location of the charge are equipotential surfaces. The electric field E at a point is perpendicular to the equipotential surface through the point. E is in the direction of the steepest decrease of potential. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance 6. Potential energy stored in a system of charges is the work done (by an external agency) in assembling the charges at their locations. Potential energy of two charges q1, q2 at r1, r2 is given by 1 q1 q 2 U = 4 πε0 r12 where r12 is distance between q1 and q2. 7. The potential energy of a charge q in an external potential V(r) is qV(r). The potential energy of a dipole moment p in a uniform electric field E is –p.E. 8. Electrostatics field E is zero in the interior of a conductor; just outside the surface of a charged conductor, E is normal to the surface given by σ E = nˆ where ˆn is the unit vector along the outward normal to the ε0 surface and s is the surface charge density. Charges in a conductor can reside only at its surface. Potential is constant within and on the surface of a conductor. In a cavity within a conductor (with no charges), the electric field is zero. 9. A capacitor is a system of two conductors separated by an insulator. Its capacitance is defined by C = Q/V, where Q and –Q are the charges on the two conductors and V is the potential difference between them. C is determined purely geometrically, by the shapes, sizes and relative positions of the two conductors. The unit of capacitance is farad:, 1 F = 1 C V –1. For a parallel plate capacitor (with vacuum between the plates), A C = ε0 d where A is the area of each plate and d the separation between them. 10. If the medium between the plates of a capacitor is filled with an insulating substance (dielectric), the electric field due to the charged plates induces a net dipole moment in the dielectric. This effect, called polarisation, gives rise to a field in the opposite direction. The net electric field inside the dielectric and hence the potential difference between the plates is thus reduced. Consequently, the capacitance C increases from its value C0 when there is no medium (vacuum), C = KC0 where K is the dielectric constant of the insulating substance. 11. For capacitors in the series combination, the total capacitance C is given by 1 1 1 1 = + + + ... C C1 C 2 C 3 In the parallel combination, the total capacitance C is: C = C1 + C2 + C3 + ... where C1, C2, C3... are individual capacitances. 77 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 12. The energy U stored in a capacitor of capacitance C, with charge Q and voltage V is 1 1 2 1 Q 2 U = QV = CV = 2 2 2 C The electric energy density (energy per unit volume) in a region with electric field is (1/2)e0E2. Physical quantity Symbol Dimensions Unit Remark Potential or V [M1 L2 T–3 A–1] V Potential difference is physically significant Capacitance C [M–1 L–2 T–4 A2] F Polarisation P [L–2 AT] C m-2 Dipole moment per unit volume Dielectric constant K [Dimensionless] POINTS TO PONDER 1. Electrostatics deals with forces between charges at rest. But if there is a force on a charge, how can it be at rest? Thus, when we are talking of electrostatic force between charges, it should be understood that each charge is being kept at rest by some unspecified force that opposes the net Coulomb force on the charge. 2. A capacitor is so configured that it confines the electric field lines within a small region of space. Thus, even though field may have considerable strength, the potential difference between the two conductors of a capacitor is small. 3. Electric field is discontinuous across the surface of a spherical charged ˆn outside. Electric potential is, however shell. It is zero inside and σε0 continuous across the surface, equal to q/4pe0R at the surface. 4. The torque p × E on a dipole causes it to oscillate about E. Only if there is a dissipative mechanism, the oscillations are damped and the dipole eventually aligns with E. 5. Potential due to a charge q at its own location is not defined – it is infinite. 6. In the expression qV (r) for potential energy of a charge q, V (r) is the potential due to external charges and not the potential due to q. As seen in point 5, this expression will be ill-defined if V (r) includes potential 78 due to a charge q itself. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance 7. A cavity inside a conductor is shielded from outside electrical influences. It is worth noting that electrostatic shielding does not work the other way round; that is, if you put charges inside the cavity, the exterior of the conductor is not shielded from the fields by the inside charges. EXERCISES

1.20 A conducting sphere of radius 10 cm has an unknown charge. If the electric field 20 cm from the centre of the sphere is 1.5 × 103 N/C and points radially inward, what is the net charge on the sphere? 43 Reprint 2025-26 Physics 1.21 A uniformly charged conducting sphere of 2.4 m diameter has a surface charge density of 80.0 mC/m2. (a) Find the charge on the sphere. (b) What is the total electric flux leaving the surface of the sphere? 1.22 An infinite line charge produces a field of 9 × 104 N/C at a distance of 2 cm. Calculate the linear charge density. 1.23 Two large, thin metal plates are parallel and close to each other. On their inner faces, the plates have surface charge densities of opposite signs and of magnitude 17.0 × 10–22 C/m2. What is E: (a) in the outer region of the first plate, (b) in the outer region of the second plate, and (c) between the plates? Reprint 2025-26 Chapter Two ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL AND CAPACITANCE 2.12.12.12.12.1 IIINTRODUCTIONIINTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTIONNTRODUCTION In Chapters 5 and 7 (Class XI), the notion of potential energy was introduced. When an external force does work in taking a body from a point to another against a force like spring force or gravitational force, that work gets stored as potential energy of the body. When the external force is removed, the body moves, gaining kinetic energy and losing an equal amount of potential energy. The sum of kinetic and potential energies is thus conserved. Forces of this kind are called conservative forces. Spring force and gravitational force are examples of conservative forces. Coulomb force between two (stationary) charges is also a conservative force. This is not surprising, since both have inverse-square dependence on distance and differ mainly in the proportionality constants – the masses in the gravitational law are replaced by charges in Coulomb’s law. Thus, like the potential energy of a mass in a gravitational field, we can define electrostatic potential energy of a charge in an electrostatic field. Consider an electrostatic field EEEEE due to some charge configuration. First, for simplicity, consider the field E due to a charge Q placed at the origin. Now, imagine that we bring a test charge q from a point R to a point P against the repulsive force on it due to the charge Q. With reference Reprint 2025-26 Physics to Fig. 2.1, this will happen if Q and q are both positive or both negative. For definiteness, let us take Q, q > 0. Two remarks may be made here. First, we assume that the test charge q is so small that it does not disturb the original configuration, namely the charge Q at the origin (or else, we keep Q fixed at the origin by some unspecified force). Second, in bringing the charge q fromFIGURE 2.1 A test charge q (> 0) is moved from the point R to the R to P, we apply an external force Fext just enough to point P against the repulsive counter the repulsive electric force FE (i.e, Fext= –FE). force on it by the charge Q (> 0) This means there is no net force on or acceleration of placed at the origin. the charge q when it is brought from R to P, i.e., it is brought with infinitesimally slow constant speed. In this situation, work done by the external force is the negative of the work done by the electric force, and gets fully stored in the form of potential energy of the charge q. If the external force is removed on reaching P, the electric force will take the charge away from Q – the stored energy (potential energy) at P is used to provide kinetic energy to the charge q in such a way that the sum of the kinetic and potential energies is conserved. Thus, work done by external forces in moving a charge q from R to P is WRP = – = (2.1) This work done is against electrostatic repulsive force and gets stored as potential energy. At every point in electric field, a particle with charge q possesses a certain electrostatic potential energy, this work done increases its potential energy by an amount equal to potential energy difference between points R and P. Thus, potential energy difference ∆U = U P − U R = W RP (2.2) (Note here that this displacement is in an opposite sense to the electric force and hence work done by electric field is negative, i.e., –WRP .) Therefore, we can define electric potential energy difference between two points as the work required to be done by an external force in moving (without accelerating) charge q from one point to another for electric field of any arbitrary charge configuration. Two important comments may be made at this stage: (i) The right side of Eq. (2.2) depends only on the initial and final positions of the charge. It means that the work done by an electrostatic field in moving a charge from one point to another depends only on the initial and the final points and is independent of the path taken to go from one point to the other. This is the fundamental characteristic of a conservative force. The concept of the potential energy would not be meaningful if the work depended on the path. The path-independence of work done by an electrostatic field can be proved using the 46 Coulomb’s law. We omit this proof here. Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance (ii) Equation (2.2) defines potential energy difference in terms of the physically meaningful quantity work. Clearly, potential energy so defined is undetermined to within an additive constant.What this means is that the actual value of potential energy is not physically significant; it is only the difference of potential energy that is significant. We can always add an arbitrary constant a to potential energy at every point, since this will not change the potential energy difference: (U P + α) − (U R + α) = U P − U R Put it differently, there is a freedom in choosing the point where potential energy is zero. A convenient choice is to have electrostatic potential energy zero at infinity. With this choice, if we take the point R at infinity, we get from Eq. (2.2) Count Alessandro Volta (1745 – 1827) Italian W ∞ P = U P − U ∞ = U P (2.3) physicist, professor at Since the point P is arbitrary, Eq. (2.3) provides us with a Pavia. Volta established that the animal electri- COUNTdefinition of potential energy of a charge q at any point. city observed by LuigiPotential energy of charge q at a point (in the presence of field Galvani, 1737–1798, indue to any charge configuration) is the work done by the experiments with frog external force (equal and opposite to the electric force) in muscle tissue placed in bringing the charge q from infinity to that point. contact with dissimilar metals, was not due to 2.2 ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIAL any exceptional property of animal tissues but ALESSANDROConsider any general static charge configuration. We define was also generated potential energy of a test charge q in terms of the work done whenever any wet body on the charge q. This work is obviously proportional to q, since was sandwiched between the force at any point is qE, where E is the electric field at that dissimilar metals. This VOLTA point due to the given charge configuration. It is, therefore, led him to develop the convenient to divide the work by the amount of charge q, so first voltaic pile, orthat the resulting quantity is independent of q. In other words, battery, consisting of a (1745 work done per unit test charge is characteristic of the electric large stack of moist disks of cardboard (electro-field associated with the charge configuration. This leads to lyte) sandwiched the idea of electrostatic potential V due to a given charge between disks of metal –1827) configuration. From Eq. (2.1), we get: (electrodes). Work done by external force in bringing a unit positive charge from point R to P  U P − U R  = VP – VR = (2.4)  q  where VP and VR are the electrostatic potentials at P and R, respectively. Note, as before, that it is not the actual value of potential but the potential difference that is physically significant. If, as before, we choose the potential to be zero at infinity, Eq. (2.4) implies: Work done by an external force in bringing a unit positive charge from infinity to a point = electrostatic potential (V ) at that point. 47 Reprint 2025-26 Physics In other words, the electrostatic potential (V ) at any point in a region with electrostatic field is the work done in bringing a unit positive charge (without acceleration) from infinity to that point. The qualifying remarks made earlier regarding potential energy also apply to the definition of potential. To obtain the work done per unit test charge, we should take an infinitesimal test charge FIGURE 2.2 Work done on a test charge q dq, obtain the work done dW in bringing it from by the electrostatic field due to any given infinity to the point and determine the ratio charge configuration is independent dW/dq. Also, the external force at every point of the of the path, and depends only on path is to be equal and opposite to the electrostatic its initial and final positions. force on the test charge at that point. 2.3 POTENTIAL DUE TO A POINT CHARGE Consider a point charge Q at the origin (Fig. 2.3). For definiteness, take Q to be positive. We wish to determine the potential at any point P with position vector r from the origin. For that we must calculate the work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the point P. For Q > 0, the work done against the repulsive force on the test charge is positive. Since work done is independent of the path, we choose a convenient path – along the radial direction from infinity to the point P. At some intermediate point P¢ on the path, the electrostatic force on a unit positive charge is FIGURE 2.3 Work done in bringing a unit positive test charge from infinity to the Q × 1 rˆ ′ (2.5) point P, against the repulsive force of 2 4 πε0r ' charge Q (Q > 0), is the potential at P due to the charge Q. where ˆ′r is the unit vector along OP¢. Work done against this force from r¢ to r¢ + Dr¢ is Q ∆W = − 2 ∆′r (2.6) 4 πε0r ' The negative sign appears because for Dr¢ < 0, DW is positive. Total work done (W) by the external force is obtained by integrating Eq. (2.6) from r¢ = ¥ to r¢ = r, r Q Q r Q = dr ′ = ε 0r ′ 2 4 πε0r ′ ∞ 4 πε0r (2.7) W = − ∫4∞ π This, by definition is the potential at P due to the charge Q Q V (r ) = (2.8) 48 4 πε0r Reprint 2025-26 Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance Equation (2.8) is true for any sign of the charge Q, though we considered Q > 0 in its derivation. For Q < 0, V < 0, i.e., work done (by the external force) per unit positive test charge in bringing it from infinity to the point is negative. This is equivalent to saying that work done by the electrostatic force in bringing the unit positive charge form infinity to the point P is positive. [This is as it should be, since for Q < 0, the force on a unit positive test charge is attractive, so that the electrostatic force and the displacement (from infinity to P) are FIGURE 2.4 Variation of potential V with r [in units of in the same direction.] Finally, we (Q/4pe0) m-1] (blue curve) and field with r [in units of (Q/4pe0) m-2] (black curve) for a point charge Q.note that Eq. (2.8) is consistent with the choice that potential at infinity be zero. Figure (2.4) shows how the electrostatic potential ( 1/r) and the electrostatic field (1/r 2 ) varies with r. Example 2.1 (a) Calculate the potential at a point P due to a charge of 4 × 10–7C located 9 cm away. (b) Hence obtain the work done in bringing a charge of 2 × 10–9 C from infinity to the point P. Does the answer depend on the path along which the charge is brought? Solution (a) = 4 × 104 V (b) W = qV = 2 × 10–9C × 4 × 104V = 8 × 10–5 J No, work done will be path independent. Any arbitrary infinitesimal path can be resolved into two perpendicular displacements: One along EXAMPLE r and another perpendicular to r. The work done corresponding to the later will be zero. 2.1